Greens insiders break cover to demand public findings in Steele-John inquiry

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Massola, J. (2026, October 18). Greens insiders break cover to demand public findings in Steele-John inquiry. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/greens-insiders-break-cover-to-demand-public-findings-in-steele-john-inquiry-20261019-p616hn.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-10-18 · by James Massola

Quick Summary

Former media advisor Tim Oliver and former state co-convenor Sarah Nielsen-Harvey have joined other Greens members in calling for a public investigation into Senator Jordon Steele-John's alleged inappropriate behavior towards women over the past decade. The group wrote to party leader David Shoebridge demanding an independent inquiry with publicly available findings after learning of a secret dossier documenting concerns about Steele-John. Despite denying any prior knowledge, Shoebridge ordered an internal inquiry following receipt of the letter last Thursday, and Steele-John has since taken leave from his position, though he denies wrongdoing and claims to welcome a fair investigation.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-18, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Greens Senator Jordon Steele-John has taken leave from his party room amid allegations of inappropriate comments towards women, following a letter sent to Greens leader David Shoebridge by seven party members demanding an investigation. The allegations date back to 2017 and involve behavior in the presence of women until 2025. Steele-John denies wrongdoing but accuses internal factions within the party of weaponizing rumors for political gain, specifically targeting forthcoming preselections. An independent investigation commissioned by the Western Australian Greens is now underway and has been referred to the Independent Parliamentary Standards Commission. Steele-John insists he is not on leave from parliament and will participate in any specific allegation investigations.

Written for “Greens Senator Leave Amid Allegations” on 2026-10-18, grounded in this article and the 9 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but all 2 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 89080: attributed speech only · logged 2026-10-18

Story

📰 Greens Senator Leave Amid Allegations
Politics · 10 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 17% hedged 4 of 23 📰 publisher trust 61
“The articles describe different events related to David Shoebridge: one about his stance on military aid for Ukraine, and another about demands for a public inquiry into allegations against Senator Steele-John.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 1 of 10 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles describe the same group of seven Greens party members demanding an investigation into Senator Jordon Steele-John's alleged conduct towards women, with similar timing and context.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 24% hedged 5 of 21 📰 publisher trust 61
“While both articles discuss allegations against Senator Jordon Steele-John, they describe different aspects of a broader situation: one focuses on his decision to take leave from parliament during an investigation, while the other reports on internal party actions and communications regarding the same allegations.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 9% hedged 3 of 34 📰 publisher trust 64
“The articles discuss different political parties and scandals involving inappropriate behavior, but they describe distinct incidents related to the Reform party and Greens party respectively.”
The Guardian · 0.88 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 18 📰 publisher trust 67
“While both articles discuss similar allegations and a secret dossier related to Jordon Steele-John, they describe different aspects of the ongoing situation: Article A focuses on Shoebridge's denial of knowledge about the document, while Article B reports on Greens insiders demanding public findings.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 7 📰 publisher trust 69
“Article A reports on Senator Jordon Steele-John taking leave from the party room amid allegations, while Article B discusses a later development with former colleagues demanding public findings and revealing past actions taken by the Greens.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 19% hedged 5 of 26 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A describes Steele-John's response to accusations against him, while Article B reports on former colleagues demanding a public investigation into those allegations.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 23 📰 publisher trust 69
“Article A discusses Senator Steele-John's denial of inappropriate conduct allegations, while Article B focuses on Greens insiders demanding a public inquiry and revealing past actions taken by the party regarding these allegations.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 33 📰 publisher trust 67
“While both articles discuss allegations against Jordon Steele-John and demands for an investigation, Article A focuses on the release of information from Greens insiders about their demand for a public inquiry, while Article B reports on Steele-John's response to these allegations and his accusation of political games by the party leader.”
The Sydney Morning Herald · 0.89 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 6 of 85 📰 publisher trust 61
“While both articles discuss similar issues regarding Senator Jordon Steele-John, they describe different stages of events: Article A focuses on how the Greens managed to suppress stories since 2016, whereas Article B reports on current demands for a public investigation and revelations about the secret dossier.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
40
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
2 of 40 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
10
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-18 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 4078 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

James Massola
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I will, of course, participate in any investigation that follows a specific allegation” but alleges that the motive for pushing for an inquiry now is to influence forthcoming party preselections.
🔮 On Friday morning, Shoebridge confirmed Steele-John would take a leave of absence from parliament during the investigation.
🔮 It sounds like a boring but sensible budget decision by the tax office because taxpayers would be on the hook to cover the additional costs.
🔮 The gloss might be starting to come off One Nation, but the government shouldn’t get too excited yet because voters clearly believe that Anthony Albanese and Labor are to blame for the cost of living crisis affecting Australians.
🔮 The poll recorded a significant movement in people’s expectations of who will win the next election.
🔮 It was the Reserve Bank that announced back in March that it would ban credit and debit card surcharges from October this year.
🔮 Amos was based in Canberra during the period that was investigated, and would regularly travel to northern Tasmania where senators Tyrrell and Lambie were based.
🔮 In June 1984, Bob Hawke’s government created the MOPS Act to set out rules governing how many advisers MPs could have.
🔮 The only thing you can take to the bank for sure from Treasury’s latest attempt to predict the next four decades is that some of the forecasts will be dead wrong.
🔮 He was, he said, unable to do so because the government could not strike a deal with the opposition on changes that would need legislation.
Also by James Massola
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by James Massola →

Topics

Greens Greens WA Instagram Shoebridge Steele-John

Subjects

Greens ORG · 8× Steele-John PERSON · 7× Oliver PERSON · 3× Shoebridge PERSON · 3× David Shoebridge PERSON · 2× Greens WA ORG · 2× Jordon Steele-John PERSON · 2× Nielsen-Harvey PERSON · 2× Sarah Nielsen-Harvey PERSON · 1× Tim Oliver PERSON · 1×

Narrative

A former media advisor to Senator Jordon Steele-John and a former state co-convenor have gone public as two of the seven Greens members who wrote to party leader David Shoebridge demanding an independent investigation into the WA senator’s alleged inappropriate comments to women, and called for the findings to be made public.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-18
🔮 I will, of course, participate in any investigation that follows a specific allegation” but alleges that the motive for pushing for an inquiry now is to influence forthcoming party preselections.
2026-10-18 · The Sydney Morning Herald
Greens insiders break cover to demand public findings in Steele-John inquiry · assertive framing

Claims (40 extracted, 2 hedged)

A former media advisor to Senator Jordon Steele-John and a former state co-convenor have gone public as two of the seven Greens members who wrote to party leader David Shoebridge demanding an independent investigation into the WA senator’s alleged inappropriate comments to women, and called for the findings to be made public. asserted
findings → go → women
On Friday this masthead revealed the Greens created and maintained a secret dossier for 10 years that catalogued allegations against Steele-John and set out ways to shut down media coverage and monitor members who raised concerns on social media. asserted
who → reveal → media
Shoebridge denied any knowledge of concerns about Steele-John before receiving the letter last Thursday, but former Greens media adviser Tim Oliver, who worked for the WA senator from October 2017 to July 2021, confirmed the existence of the crisis communications dossier and its use. asserted
who → deny → dossier
“I was briefed on the document when I worked for Steele-John, but I had no involvement in its creation or say in the actions attributed to me. asserted
I → brief → me
What I have learned in the years since is that whenever allegations such as these are made, it is most important that we believe women,” he said. asserted
he → learn → women
“The public’s mistrust of politics is driven by a perception that MPs protect their own; I have always advocated for these processes to be public and transparent,” he said. asserted
he → drive → own
Former WA co-convener Sarah Nielsen-Harvey, another of the letter writers, has joined Oliver and the four Greens in WA’s state parliament in calling for the results of the independent inquiry ordered by Shoebridge to be made public. asserted
results → join → Shoebridge
Steele-John took leave last Thursday after Shoebridge received the letter from seven Greens members and officials, including Oliver and Nielsen-Harvey, regarding “multiple allegations” about “his [Steele-John’s] behaviour in the presence of women” between 2017 and 2025. asserted
Shoebridge → take → 2017
“We have been made aware of multiple allegations ... being made against WA federal senator Jordon Steele-John spanning almost a decade (2017-2025). asserted
We → make → decade
These allegations all concern his behaviour in the presence of women. asserted
allegations → concern → women
We are aware of multiple women who have taken up roles or volunteered in the party, who because of these allegations, have been warned not to … be alone with him,” the letter claims. uncertain
letter → take → him
Steele-John strongly denies claims against him, describing them as non-specific. uncertain
John → deny → them
On Sunday night, he broke his silence in a 2400-word statement posted on social media. asserted
he → break → media
In it he accused factions within the Greens of weaponising rumours about him for political reasons, and said he was not on leave as leader David Shoebridge had claimed. “I genuinely welcome the opportunity to participate in the Greens WA investigation process,” he said. asserted
he → accuse → process
On Sunday night, Steele-John published an open letter on Instagram addressing allegations in the letter, which he says he shared with Greens WA and “asked them to ensure that the concerns raised in it about my behaviour are investigated fairly and thoroughly. asserted
concerns → publish → behaviour
I will, of course, participate in any investigation that follows a specific allegation” but alleges that the motive for pushing for an inquiry now is to influence forthcoming party preselections. asserted
motive → participate → preselections
The senator says he does not know who signed the letter calling for an inquiry, “and I suspect many did so out of a genuine commitment to people who experience violence. asserted
who → say → violence
I share that commitment. asserted
I → share → commitment
That is exactly why I am so angry that it has been used this way. asserted
it → use → ?
“When processes meant to protect victims are turned into weapons in preselection contests, everyone loses. asserted
everyone → mean → contests
Survivors become less likely to be believed. asserted
Survivors → become → ?
Real complaints are treated with suspicion. asserted
complaints → treat → suspicion
And the people who did this know it. asserted
who → do → it
It is factionalism, and it has no place in the Greens. asserted
it → have → Greens
Nielsen-Harvey resigned as co-convenor in 2017 after the WA Greens decided to re-employ Steele-John as volunteers’ co-ordinator, before he was a senator, in the lead-up to the 2017 WA state election. asserted
he → resign → election
On Sunday, she told this masthead that while serving in the former role “I became aware of allegations as to behaviour I considered unacceptable”. asserted
I → tell → behaviour
“I raised my concerns internally. asserted
I → raise → concerns
It was (and to my understanding, remains) the wish of the two people [two young women who had made a complaint about Steele-John] concerned to not pursue this further. asserted
who → remain → this
I and others were prepared to publicly stand with them, but most importantly, we respected their desire to not pursue anything further and I resigned from my position,” she said. asserted
she → prepare → position
“I am also aware of a more recent allegation [against Steele-John], and I will not make further comment as an independent investigation is vital. asserted
investigation → make → comment
“Since 2018 I have supported survivors of historical child sexual abuse, against the power of religious, state run and other institutions ... coming forward to make allegations against powerful figures in institutions takes immense courage. asserted
coming → support → courage
Every organisation must have an investigation procedure, have an action plan and take every allegation seriously. asserted
organisation → have → allegation
“I remain a member [of the Greens] and in 2025 I stood as a candidate in the WA state election because it is my deeply held belief that the Greens’ policies on education and health, action on climate change, are an opportunity to help people and our planet. asserted
policies → remain → people
We can believe in something, and we can call for better.” asserted
we → believe → better
A spokesperson for federal Greens leader Shoebridge said: “This inquiry needs to be fair, independent, and timely - and in the interests of independence, we won’t direct those conducting the inquiry as to how it should operate. “ asserted
it → say → inquiry
As Greens leader, Senator Shoebridge supports the key findings of the investigation being made public.” asserted
Shoebridge → support → investigation
It can also be revealed that former WA state Greens leader Elizabeth “Giz” Watson, who is currently the co-convener of the WA branch, will play no role in the independent investigation into Steele-John after Greens party members raised concerns about her involvement. asserted
members → reveal → involvement
Watson was the party’s state leader when complaints first surfaced, and the dossier includes an email to her from Nielsen-Harvey. asserted
dossier → surface → Harvey
Steele-John and Watson were contacted for comment. asserted
John → contact → comment
Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter. asserted
Subscribers → sign → newsletter
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support