Photo via Toronto Star

Acquia Research Finds CMOs and CIOs Don't Agree on Who Leads Their Shared AI Decisions

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Acquia Research Finds CMOs and CIOs Don't Agree on Who Leads Their Shared AI Decisions. (2026, September 14). Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/globenewswire/acquia-research-finds-cmos-and-cios-dont-agree-on-who-leads-their-shared-ai-decisions/article_d13c4689-8db5-50b5-b2c6-a251968aaf68.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-14 · by GlobeNewswire, Inc.

Quick Summary

Acquia released research indicating a discrepancy between chief marketing officers (CMOs) and chief information officers (CIOs) regarding who leads their shared artificial intelligence decision-making processes. The study, based on surveys of 500 CMOs, CIOs, and chief technology officers (CTOs), reveals conflicting views within organizations about AI governance structures, with both groups expressing uncertainty about their roles in deploying these systems. Acquia's CEO, Chris Tranquill, emphasizes the need for unified decision-making between marketing and IT to establish a reliable source of truth for AI-driven trust assessments.
Written by AI on 2026-09-14, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Acquia released research showing that CMOs and CIOs are at odds over who leads AI decision-making in their organizations. The study titled “The Missing Success Factor for Growth in the Agentic Era: A New Mandate for CMOs and CIOs” surveyed 500 C-level executives including CMOs, CIOs, and CTOs. It revealed that marketing and IT departments describe different decision-making structures within their companies, despite both sides privately questioning their capacity to manage AI systems. Acquia CEO Chris Tranquill emphasized the shift from earning trust through individual customer interactions to an instantaneous evaluation by machines, underscoring the need for unified governance of AI by both marketing and IT teams.

Written for “CMO CIO AI Disagreement” on 2026-10-29, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 CMO CIO AI Disagreement
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Independent
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different topics: one covers a research study on CMOs and CIOs' opinions about AI decision-making, while the other reports on President Trump's comments regarding AI regulation.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 8 of 55 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A discusses a research study on disagreements between CMOs and CIOs about AI decision-making, while Article B reports on international concerns over AI advancement and calls for slowing its development.”
Platformer
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI in business and regulation, not the same specific incident.”
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 32 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to AI and its governance but do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 17 of 70 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI control and governance; one focuses on a survey about disagreements between CMOs and CIOs, while the other addresses broader fears and cybersecurity issues in AI.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 5 of 64 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different research reports with distinct findings and survey methodologies conducted by separate organizations on different dates.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 31 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A reports on research findings by Acquia regarding CMOs and CIOs' disagreement on AI decision-making, while Article B contains letters to the editor about political warnings related to AI regulation.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
6
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
17%
1 of 6 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 10281 article(s) · 27 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 27 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

No reporter is named on this article, beyond the feed's “GlobeNewswire, Inc.”.

Topics

Acquia BOSTON GLOBE NEWSWIRE

Subjects

Acquia ORG · 2× BOSTON GPE · 1× Chris Tranquill PERSON · 1× GLOBE NEWSWIRE ORG · 1×

Narrative

The study, “The Missing Success Factor for Growth in the Agentic Era: A New Mandate for CMOs and CIOs,” surveyed 500 CMOs, CIOs, and CTOs and found that marketing and IT describe two different decision-making structures inside the same companies, while both sides privately doubt their own ability to govern the AI systems they are about to deploy.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 “Now it’s judged instantly, by a machine, on behalf of someone who may never see your homepage.

Claims (6 extracted, 1 hedged)

Acquia today announced new global research showing that CMOs and CIOs, now forced to co-own the biggest AI decisions inside their organizations, cannot agree on who is actually making them. asserted
who → announce → them
The study, “The Missing Success Factor for Growth in the Agentic Era: A New Mandate for CMOs and CIOs,” surveyed 500 CMOs, CIOs, and CTOs and found that marketing and IT describe two different decision-making structures inside the same companies, while both sides privately doubt their own ability to govern the AI systems they are about to deploy. asserted
they → miss → systems
“Trust used to be earned one visitor at a time,” said Chris Tranquill, Chief Executive Officer at Acquia. asserted
Tranquill → use → Acquia
“Now it’s judged instantly, by a machine, on behalf of someone who may never see your homepage. uncertain
who → judge → homepage
You don’t win that kind of trust with a bigger marketing budget or a stricter compliance checklist. asserted
You → win → budget
You win it when everything an AI agent finds about your brand comes from one governed source of truth, built by marketing and IT together.” asserted
agent → win → marketing
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support