California Gov Newsom boosts AI regulation as he eyes 2028 presidential run

Read the original at Al Jazeera ↗
Cite

Roy, S. (2026, October 17). California Gov Newsom boosts AI regulation as he eyes 2028 presidential run. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/10/17/california-gov-newsom-boosts-ai-regulation-as-he-eyes-2028-presidential-run?traffic_source=rss

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Al Jazeera · collected 2026-10-17 · by Saumya Roy

Quick Summary

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed executive orders aimed at regulating artificial intelligence (AI) in his final days in office as he prepares for a potential 2028 presidential run. The orders call for independent verification of AI models and the creation of safety measures, including kill switches to prevent harmful actions by rogue AI agents. This move comes after Newsom previously vetoed similar legislation, citing concerns that it would hinder technological progress. Now, he is considering expanding regulations to address recent safety breaches involving AI companies, such as unauthorized access to government data and cyberattacks.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In his final days as California governor, Gavin Newsom signed an executive order on October 17, 2026, aimed at regulating artificial intelligence more strictly. The order calls for independent verification of AI models and the creation of a committee to develop "kill switches" for potentially harmful AI systems. This move comes after he vetoed similar legislation in 2024, citing concerns about stifling technological progress. Newsom’s actions are seen as part of his strategy to boost his profile ahead of a potential run for president in 2028. The new order also aims to broaden the definition of AI safety incidents and explore additional measures that were previously vetoed.

Written for “California Govenor Boosts AI Regulation” on 2026-10-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but 1 quote(s) could not be found in the article and the other 3 are attributed speech rather than the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 87202: no verified evidence · logged 2026-10-17

Story

📰 California Govenor Boosts AI Regulation
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 26% hedged 10 of 38 📰 publisher trust 73
“The articles discuss AI regulation but describe different actions and contexts: one is a general discussion about the need for AI regulation, while the other reports on specific executive orders signed by California Governor Newsom.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
39
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
7 of 39 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
Al Jazeera's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Al Jazeera · 3263 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Saumya Roy
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In his last few executive orders signed as California governor, Gavin Newsom, whose final term ends in January, issued one asking for independent verification of artificial intelligence models and set up an expert committee to create kill switches for AI agents that could go rogue and cause harm.
🔮 Bruce Blakeman, a Republican who is running for governor of New York, released campaign ads featuring Zohran Mamdani, New York City mayor, and Kathy Hochul, the state’s governor, gardening together and collaborating to raise prices for residents.
Also by Saumya Roy
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

California Indian Newsom San Francisco United States

Subjects

Newsom PERSON · 7× Al Jazeera ORG · 3× California GPE · 2× United States GPE · 2× Adani ORG · 1× Gavin Newsom PERSON · 1× Indian NORP · 1× Israeli NORP · 1× Nigeria GPE · 1× San Francisco GPE · 1×

Narrative

Recommended Stories list of 4 items- list 1 of 4‘It was fake’: Indian villagers allege forgery behind Adani mine project - list 2 of 4How Israeli firm’s ‘zero-click’ malware attack poses global security risk - list 3 of 4The artisanal miners behind Nigeria’s lithium boom - list 4 of 4How Iran messaging highlights cost of war ahead of US midterm elections Now eyeing a 2028 United States presidential run, he wants to expand the definition of safety incidents, potentially to include the recent series of safety breaches, explore a kill switch and include other measures that were in the vetoed bill.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-17
🔮 In his last few executive orders signed as California governor, Gavin Newsom, whose final term ends in January, issued one asking for independent verification of artificial intelligence models and set up an expert committee to create kill switches for AI agents that could go rogue and cause harm.

Claims (39 extracted, 7 hedged)

In his last few executive orders signed as California governor, Gavin Newsom, whose final term ends in January, issued one asking for independent verification of artificial intelligence models and set up an expert committee to create kill switches for AI agents that could go rogue and cause harm. uncertain
that → sign → harm
In 2024, Newsom vetoed a bill, passed in the state assembly, asking for similar requirements that the governor has now called for in his executive order. asserted
governor → veto → order
Newsom said at the time that it would amount to “thwarting the promise of this technology”. asserted
it → say → technology
Recommended Stories list of 4 items- list 1 of 4‘It was fake’: Indian villagers allege forgery behind Adani mine project - list 2 of 4How Israeli firm’s ‘zero-click’ malware attack poses global security risk - list 3 of 4The artisanal miners behind Nigeria’s lithium boom - list 4 of 4How Iran messaging highlights cost of war ahead of US midterm elections Now eyeing a 2028 United States presidential run, he wants to expand the definition of safety incidents, potentially to include the recent series of safety breaches, explore a kill switch and include other measures that were in the vetoed bill. asserted
that → allege → bill
“He is in a lame duck period here,” says Alex Hanna, director of research at the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR), unsure that the measures will pass in the remainder of his term. asserted
measures → say → term
“He is setting up his next thing.” asserted
He → set → thing
US voters are increasingly concerned about AI safety, data centres and job losses, and this could show Newsom is acting to address this, Hanna says. uncertain
Hanna → show → this
After vetoing the 2024 bill, Newsom had asked Scott Wiener, the state senator who drafted the bill, to redraft it in consultation with an expert committee. asserted
who → veto → committee
He signed that frontier AI bill, the nation’s first, into law in October 2025. asserted
He → sign → October
It asks large developers to disclose certain safety incidents, including the deaths of 50 or more people, large-scale cyberattacks or monetary theft. asserted
It → ask → people
Christabel Randolph, associate director at the Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP), says, “It seems the governor operated from the premise that a slower pace of regulation would be sufficient because the companies would pace their investments, and did not anticipate that the companies would be accelerating the risks.” asserted
companies → say → risks
AI companies have reportedly had thousands of safety incidents in internal and real-world tests in the last few months. uncertain
companies → have → months
These include efforts by agents to get information from the US Securities and Exchange Commission and Census Bureau, as well as confidential information from Australian and Canadian government sites. asserted
These → include → sites
AI startup Hugging Face had earlier revealed that OpenAI agents had infiltrated its systems, one among a spate of such incidents. asserted
agents → reveal → incidents
“No governor has been more out-front on addressing the risks of AI than Governor Newsom,” Tara Gallegos, the governor’s director of communications, told Al Jazeera. asserted
Gallegos → address → Jazeera
In his message vetoing the bill in September 2024, Newsom had said “the bill applies stringent standards to even the most basic functions” and noted that 32 of the world’s 50 leading AI companies are in California. asserted
32 → veto → California
Industry representatives, too, had rallied against the bill. asserted
representatives → rally → bill
“In essence, the bill is creating this disastrous regressive tax on AI innovation,” Anjney Midha, general partner at the Bay Area-based venture capital firm Andresen Horowitz, had said at the time. asserted
Midha → create → time
If enacted, it would force AI founders to move elsewhere, Midha warned. asserted
Midha → enact → founders
“The bill was unworkable when it reached his desk,” Newsom’s spokesperson Gallegos told Al Jazeera. asserted
spokesperson → reach → Jazeera
But Hamid Ekbia, professor at Syracuse University and founding director of the Academic Alliance for AI Policy, says industry cannot be relied on to regulate itself. asserted
industry → found → itself
“There is a need to break down the monopoly of the big AI companies,” Ekbia told Al Jazeera. asserted
Ekbia → be → Jazeera
“Their financial stakes are too high,” to self-regulate, he said, referring to Open AI and Anthropic’s upcoming public offerings and tax breaks that some companies are reportedly taking advantage of to build data centres. uncertain
companies → regulate → centres
Newsom has now set up an expert committee to examine setting up a kill switch, which had been proposed in a more comprehensive manner in the original bill. asserted
which → set → bill
“SB 1047 [the bill that was vetoed] had a concrete architecture; the EO [executive order] only includes one aspect – the Kill Switch or shutdown/stoppage mechanisms, which is quite different and weaker than the ex ante termination obligation of SB 1047,” which required stronger safety measures even before training runs of the AI models could start, CAIDP’s Randolph said. uncertain
Randolph → veto → models
DAIR’s Hanna says that with the order, Newsom “is showing he is attentive without planning anything drastic”. asserted
he → say → anything
Building AI safety in real time “We are building the field of AI safety in real time,” says Rebecca Finlay, chief executive officer of Partnership for AI, a nonprofit that works on technology governance, underscoring the challenges of regulating an industry growing at a meteoric pace. asserted
that → build → pace
Newsom has asked the California Emergency Services Office to send recommendations on AI regulation by November 15 and could convene a special legislative session to discuss how to implement these, possibly before his term ends. uncertain
term → ask → these
This would be in contrast to the federal government, which has pushed for self-regulation by industry. asserted
which → push → industry
CAIDP’s Randolph says California could play an important role in setting the floor for AI regulation given that much of the global AI industry is based there. uncertain
much → say → industry
DAIR’s Hanna says Newsom is not only looking to show a contrast with US President Donald Trump, who believes in self-regulation by firms and last month signed a voluntary accord with several AI leaders, but also with possible Democratic contenders. asserted
who → say → contenders
“With this, Newsom can look good on the primary debate stage,” she said. asserted
she → look → stage
Gallegos, the governor’s spokesperson, told Al Jazeera that “Governor Newsom isn’t interested in virtue-signalling or chasing headlines — he is leading the nation by taking a smarter, strategic, and effective approach to addressing frontier technology”. asserted
he → tell → technology
Experts say that along with Newsom’s order setting up a committee to examine a kill switch, there is a need for measures for controls across the life cycle to reinforce safety. asserted
controls → say → safety
“Safety needs to be built in. asserted
Safety → need → ?
We issued 12 guidances across the lifecycle when the last ChatGPT model was released. asserted
model → issue → lifecycle
There is a need for safety features throughout the life cycle,” of an AI model, Partnership for AI’s Finlay said. asserted
Finlay → be → AI
As Newsom considers such recommendations from California agencies and the expert committee, Ekbia says governments “should take a lesson from what happened with social media. asserted
what → consider → media
A handful of companies having control were able to do a lot of harm,” and regulate with an anticipatory approach and take on corporate monopolies. asserted
handful → have → monopolies
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support