America is repeating the blindness of 9/11 — this time with AI

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Oktenli, B. (2026, September 14). America is repeating the blindness of 9/11 — this time with AI. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4725297/ai-critical-infrastructure-911-lessons/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-14 · by Burak Oktenli

Quick Summary

The article discusses how America’s response to threats should evolve beyond the 9/11 era, emphasizing the importance of readiness against new technological dangers like artificial intelligence (AI). It highlights a hypothetical scenario where AI manages logistics for multiple states and experiences an authority crisis, leading to confusion among local officials about which commands are legitimate. The piece argues that while there is cause for concern over security weaknesses in AI systems as shown by recent tests, the focus should be on preparing for real-world dependencies rather than speculative apocalyptic scenarios. It also mentions a 2024 warning from U.S. agencies regarding Chinese cyber threats to critical infrastructure, underscoring the need for preparedness against foreign adversaries who seek access to these systems.
Written by AI on 2026-09-14, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In a speech commemorating the 9/11 attacks, President Donald Trump renewed America's commitment to remembering those who died and emphasized the need for being both strong and smart against future threats. The article argues that preparing for new dangers requires more than just remembrance; it demands foresight and imagination to anticipate novel risks. Using the 9/11 Commission’s findings as a reference, the piece highlights how dangerous situations can arise from gaps in communication and coordination between different agencies and authorities.

The author then draws an analogy with the current advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), suggesting that rapid progress in AI presents new challenges for institutional coordination and management. The Trump administration's AI Action Plan focuses on innovation, infrastructure, and international security but also underscores the importance of being able to limit or withdraw AI systems' authority when necessary without disrupting national operations. This calls for a careful balance between leveraging AI’s power and managing potential risks effectively.

Written for “AI Risks And Oversight” on 2026-10-29, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Risks And Oversight
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 2% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 71 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe reflections on the 9/11 attacks from different perspectives and times - one is an immediate commemoration while the other discusses broader implications years later.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 30 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A describes the commemoration of the 25th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, while Article B discusses broader reflections on preparedness and institutional responses to threats like AI, referencing but not directly reporting the specific 2026 anniversary event.”
Fox News
Hedges 2 of 30 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe commemorations and reflections on the 9/11 attacks versus an editorial commentary about the lessons learned from those events.”
NBC News
Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of events related to 9/11 but do not describe the same specific occurrence.”
The Guardian
Hedges 17 of 146 claims Outlet record 67/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and national security with no clear overlap in a single incident.”
The Independent
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses President Trump's speech on a broader theme of preparedness for future threats after 9/11, while Article B reports on Trump's social media rant about AI regulation.”
Times of India
Hedges 2 of 15 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles mention President Donald Trump and discuss artificial intelligence in a broader context, they describe different specific events: one focuses on Trump's speech commemorating 9/11 and discussing preparedness for new threats, while the other covers his push to maintain US leadership in AI.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 8 of 55 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different topics: one is about the commemoration of 9/11 and lessons learned, while the other focuses on calls to slow AI development due to potential risks.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different topics, one about commemorating 9/11 and the other about President Trump's comments on AI.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 8 of 52 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns and political reactions, not the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
58
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
2%
1 of 58 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3681 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Burak Oktenli
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A defense laboratory could add one simple test: approve a benign configuration, change one material dependency, and ask whether reviewers correctly determine which evidence still applies.
🔮 It would be a mistake to treat one monthly jobs report as proof that AI is either destroying employment or already delivering a productivity miracle.
🔮 The next day, Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) introduced the Facilitating Liberty and Accountability for Flock Observations Act, which would require federal agencies to obtain a warrant before accessing or sharing data from networked ALPR systems.
🔮 OpenAI has also said that some organizations may review a notification and conclude that the model accessed intentionally public information or exposed a design weakness rather than causing a significant security incident.
🔮 As of Sept. 22, public reporting still has not established where the force would sit, what authorities it would hold, or which mission would distinguish it from agencies already handling cybercrime, national security, critical infrastructure, and technology policy.
🔮 In a joint advisory, the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency warned that denial-of-service attacks could make voter information tools or unofficial election night reporting unavailable while leaving the underlying voting process intact.
🔮 CNN could not determine which chatbot was used, and the actual cargo has not been publicly identified.
🔮 China urged the U.S. to halt its military buildup in space and warned that the disclosure could fuel an arms race.
🔮 That is the case when Congress should begin testing for a Department of Cyber War — not a new military service and not an agency empowered to wage war, but a civilian institution whose central mission would be national continuity during severe cyber conflict.
🔮 It requires the imagination to prepare for dangers that will not look like the last one.
Also by Burak Oktenli
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by Burak Oktenli →

Topics

9/11 America Americans Pentagon Washington

Subjects

Americans NORP · 2× America GPE · 1× American NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Hollywood GPE · 1× Pentagon ORG · 1× The 9/11 Commission ORG · 1× The United States GPE · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× Washington GPE · 1×

Narrative

In controlled evaluations, the National Institute of Standards and Technology showed that malicious instructions hidden in material encountered by an AI agent can redirect it toward harmful tasks.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
🔮 It requires the imagination to prepare for dangers that will not look like the last one.
2026-09-14 · Washington Examiner
America is repeating the blindness of 9/11 — this time with AI · assertive framing

Claims (58 extracted, 1 hedged)

Americans again mourned the 2,977 people murdered on Sept. 11, 2001. asserted
Americans → mourn → Sept.
At the Pentagon, President Donald Trump renewed the nation’s vow never to forget and said America must be “strong” and “smart.” asserted
America → renew → vow
That vow asks more of Washington than remembrance. asserted
vow → ask → remembrance
It requires the imagination to prepare for dangers that will not look like the last one. asserted
that → require → one
No technological breakdown belongs on the same moral plane as deliberate mass murder. asserted
breakdown → belong → murder
The 9/11 Commission organized its central findings around imagination, policy, capabilities, and management. asserted
Commission → organize → imagination
It showed how grave danger can grow inside gaps between agencies, authorities, and assumptions long before the public sees a catastrophe. asserted
public → show → catastrophe
Artificial intelligence is creating a new version of that coordination problem. asserted
intelligence → create → problem
The United States is moving quickly — and rightly — to lead the world in AI. asserted
States → move → AI
The Trump administration’s AI Action Plan puts innovation, infrastructure, and international security at the center of American strategy. asserted
Plan → put → strategy
But winning the AI race requires more than deploying powerful systems. asserted
winning → win → systems
It requires knowing how to withdraw their authority without stopping the country they help run. asserted
they → require → country
Hospitals, fuel distributors, and emergency managers across several states rely on the same AI-enabled logistics service. asserted
Hospitals → rely → service
It begins issuing contradictory routing orders. asserted
It → begin → orders
Operators suspend it, but contractors, warehouses, and automated dispatch systems continue executing instructions they accepted minutes earlier. asserted
they → suspend → instructions
Local officials can see that the computers are running. asserted
computers → see → ?
They cannot tell which commands remain legitimate, which deliveries were canceled, or how far the suspect instructions traveled. asserted
instructions → tell → ?
This is not a Hollywood story about a conscious machine seizing the grid. asserted
machine → seize → grid
It is a crisis of authority: Software was permitted to interpret information, select tools, and direct work across organizational boundaries, then lost the trust that justified those permissions. asserted
that → permit → permissions
The danger comes from what the system can reach and do — not from whether it sounds intelligent. asserted
it → come → what
In controlled evaluations, the National Institute of Standards and Technology showed that malicious instructions hidden in material encountered by an AI agent can redirect it toward harmful tasks. asserted
instructions → control → tasks
Those tests identified a security weakness; they did not demonstrate an unstoppable national outbreak. asserted
they → identify → outbreak
Likewise, the International AI Safety Report 2026 records substantial disagreement about extreme loss-of-control scenarios. asserted
Report → record → scenarios
Preparedness should rest on tested dependencies, not apocalyptic certainty. asserted
Preparedness → rest → dependencies
In 2024, U.S. agencies warned that the China-sponsored Volt Typhoon group had compromised critical infrastructure networks to position itself for disruption during a crisis or conflict. asserted
group → warn → crisis
It did show that foreign adversaries seek quiet access to the systems Americans depend on. asserted
Americans → show → systems
Giving software more delegated authority raises the value of that access — and raises the cost of discovering too late that continuity plans exist only on paper. asserted
plans → give → paper
The answer is not a federal “kill switch,” a new censorship apparatus, or a bureaucracy empowered to shut down private technology on speculation. asserted
answer → empower → speculation
Emergency restrictions should be narrow, accountable, time-limited, and reviewable. asserted
restrictions → limit → ?
The federal government’s job is to set a continuity baseline for essential services while leaving operational control with the public and private institutions legally responsible for them. asserted
job → set → them
That standard should begin with an authority map. asserted
standard → begin → map
Before an AI system enters an essential function, its operator should know what actions it may take, what tools it may use, which outside organizations accept its instructions, and who can suspend each permission. uncertain
who → enter → permission
Revoking authority at the source must trigger a traceable process for reconciling work already accepted downstream. asserted
Revoking → revoke → work
A canceled command cannot be assumed to erase an action already completed. asserted
command → cancel → action
Next, the country should exercise continuity without the suspect service. asserted
country → exercise → service
CISA, sector agencies, governors, infrastructure operators, and vendors should build the loss of a trusted AI service into existing emergency drills. asserted
CISA → build → drills
The measure of success is not whether a vendor restarts its server. asserted
vendor → restart → server
It is whether patients receive care, fuel reaches the right destination, protective systems remain safe, and emergency communications continue. asserted
communications → receive → destination
NIST’s operational-technology guidance rightly treats safety, reliability, and performance as distinct requirements. asserted
guidance → treat → requirements
A hospital, a pipeline, and an electric utility; therefore, need different fallbacks. asserted
hospital → need → fallbacks
…and 18 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support