Oklahoma Judge's Ruling Contained AI Hallucinations

Reason · collected 2026-09-14 · by Eugene Volokh
Read the original at Reason ↗

Summary

Judge Lawrence Wheeler of Stephens County, Oklahoma, admitted to using OpenAI’s ChatGPT during research and included non-existent case citations in an order as a result. An August 17 letter from a prosecutor to the state attorney general revealed this information. The same letter also mentioned other allegations against Judge Wheeler, including that he offered to amend an order for dismissal of a writ and allegedly eavesdropped on jury deliberations. However, after reviewing these claims, Oklahoma’s Attorney General Gentner Drummond decided not to pursue criminal charges further.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
4
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
50%
2 of 4 hedged
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Correction & hedging signals
91.5
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-14 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Judge Lawrence Wheeler of the District Court of Stephens County, Oklahoma, disclosed that he used ChatGPT during research and inadvertently included non-existent case citations in an order. This revelation prompted an investigation by the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI). The OSBI also probed claims that Judge Wheeler offered to amend an order in exchange for a dismissal of a writ seeking relief from the Oklahoma Supreme Court and allegations he eavesdropped on jury deliberations, as detailed in a letter by prosecutor Jason Hicks to the state attorney general's office.

In response to these allegations, Attorney General Gentner Drummond reviewed the OSBI’s findings and decided not to pursue further action against Judge Wheeler. The decision was based on the absence of evidence supporting additional criminal claims beyond the initial misuse of AI-generated content.

Written for “AI Hallucinations In Court” on 2026-09-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 8674 · logged 2026-09-14

Story

📰 AI Hallucinations In Court
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

Reason · 110 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
43 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent An excerpt from the long opinion today in Lewis-Williams v. S.F. Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist., decided by Judge Ryan Nelson, joined by Judges Johnnie Rawlinson and Bridget Bade: San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District seeks to overturn a jury verdict of $7,824,580 to six former employees for Title VII violations for failure to accommodate their sincere religious objections to a COVID-19 vaccine mandate.
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent I much enjoyed participating in this, and I expect many of our readers will much enjoy listening to it.
🔮 [Nor do they] offer … facts that would suggest inevitable or likely exposure to the curriculum (or its harmful effects)….
🔮 The court concluded that "The Big Board's refusal to comply with the orders was not expressive conduct protected by the First Amendment," so not renewing his license based solely on such refusal would have been constitutional:
🔮 Lambert … falsely stated that the Plaintiffs had conflicts of interest with her clients and/or her firm, that she would sue the Plaintiffs if they were to be engaged in these relationships, and implicitly that she would take legal action against the relationships themselves if they were to hire Plaintiffs.
🔮 The court concluded that, even "assuming arguendo that there's a fair chance that the press defendants have violated the federal and state trade secrets provisions," the First Amendment would preclude the TRO:
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent From the docket this morning; for more on the case, see here and here (the latter item notes the sealing, and expresses the now-realized hope that "the motion will be unsealed at some point soon"): Via email, Plaintiff has informed the Court that it will not be pursuing preliminary injunctive relief….
🔮 Perhaps most analogously to alienation of affections, if Alan breaches his contract with Betty, and Cathy encouraged him to breach it, she will in many situations be liable for intentional interference with contract.
2026-09-06 · assertive framing · Alienation of Affections as Complicity
🔮 In a phone call on March 2, Gelb told Netrebko to issue a statement specifically denouncing Putin, or she would be fired.
🔮 A malicious act "include[s] any intentional conduct that would probably affect the marital relationship.
More on this subject from Eugene Volokh
All 43 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

ChatGPT OpenAI Reuters the District Court of Stephens County the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation

Subjects

Wheeler PERSON · 2× the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation ORG · 2× David Lat PERSON · 1× Hicks PERSON · 1× Lawrence Wheeler PERSON · 1× Mike Scarcella PERSON · 1× Oklahoma GPE · 1× OpenAI ORG · 1× Reuters ORG · 1× the District Court of Stephens County ORG · 1×

Narrative

The OSBI also looked into allegations "that Judge Wheeler offered to amend the order in exchange for a dismissal of a writ seeking relief from the Oklahoma Supreme Court" and that he "eavesdropped on jury deliberations," the DA [Jason Hicks] disclosed in the letter.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-14
2026-09-14 · Reason
Oklahoma Judge's Ruling Contained AI Hallucinations · mixed framing

Claims (4 extracted, 2 hedged)

The judge, Lawrence Wheeler of the District Court of Stephens County, told an investigator with the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation that he used OpenAI's ChatGPT for research, and that an order he drafted contained two citations to cases that do not exist, according to an August 17 letter from a prosecutor to the state attorney general's office…. According to the August 17 letter, Hicks recused himself from investigating Wheeler and asked Oklahoma State Attorney General Gentner Drummond to review the Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation's report or reassign the inquiry. uncertain
Hicks → tell → inquiry
Drummond's office in its statement on Wednesday said its criminal division "thoroughly reviewed" the claims and was not pursuing them further. uncertain
division → say → them
The initial report came in The Oklahoman (Nolan Clay); it's paywalled, but here's a brief excerpt: asserted
excerpt → come → Oklahoman
The OSBI also looked into allegations "that Judge Wheeler offered to amend the order in exchange for a dismissal of a writ seeking relief from the Oklahoma Supreme Court" and that he "eavesdropped on jury deliberations," the DA [Jason Hicks] disclosed in the letter. asserted
DA → look → letter
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support