Elizabeth Holmes Is Not the Problem With You Can See Everything

Read the original at TIME ↗
Cite

Zacharek, S. (2026, October 16). Elizabeth Holmes Is Not the Problem With You Can See Everything. TIME. https://time.com/article/2026/10/15/you-can-see-everything-movie-review/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

TIME · collected 2026-10-16 · by Stephanie Zacharek

Quick Summary

The article critiques the documentary "You Can See Everything," which follows Elizabeth Holmes during her final days of freedom before serving time for fraud related to her company Theranos. The filmmakers, Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, camped out with Holmes and her family for 34 days as she promised transparency but repeatedly provided evasive answers under scrutiny from the documentary team. The piece argues that despite claims of objectivity in filmmaking, the documentary reflects the directors' biases through their reactions and questioning techniques, suggesting a less objective portrayal than initially perceived.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Elizabeth Holmes, former CEO of Theranos, is not the focus of criticism in Stephanie Zacharek's latest piece for TIME, which instead delves into the concept of documentary neutrality. Published on October 16, 2026, Zacharek critiques the idea that documentary filmmakers can remain completely objective and unbiased. She uses Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim's film "You Can See Everything," which debuted at the Telluride Film Festival earlier in the fall, as a case study to explore how filmmakers' sensibilities inevitably shape their work despite efforts towards objectivity. Zacharek draws comparisons with classic documentaries like Primetime and Some Kind of Heaven, directed by Oppenheim, highlighting that documentaries are made by humans and thus carry human biases. She argues that while documentary films aim to capture truth, the presence of a filmmaker's perspective inherently influences what is seen and interpreted by viewers.

Written for “Elizabeth Holmes Trial Updates” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 85656 · logged 2026-10-16

Story

📰 Elizabeth Holmes Trial Updates
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
54
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
7 of 54 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
60/100
TIME's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

TIME · 611 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Stephanie Zacharek
11 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Warning: This post contains spoilers for You Can See Everything We might like to believe that documentary filmmakers are adamantly neutral parties, aiming their cameras at people who are just being themselves and, later, turning whatever the camera captures into objective truth.
🔮 But she’s also prickly and unpleasant—she has alienated most of the people who might be able to help her—and a self-destructive streak hinders her further: She’d rather go out for a night of clubbing and coke than stay in and learn her lines for the next day’s important audition.
🔮 Somehow, the runtime slips by faster than you might have expected.
🔮 A fling might be just what she needs.
🔮 Then his wife dies suddenly, making him a single dad with three kids to care for, teenager Fatiha (Adia), her younger brother Qadir (Jahleel Kamara), and an infant, Aziza, who can’t tolerate baby formula; only her mother’s breast milk will do, and supplies are quickly running out.
🔮 In one episode, Wilson walked around a New York neighborhood until he saw an Italian flag, figuring that the person who’d hung it would know enough about Italian food to help him learn to cook risotto, which he wanted to make as a treat for his elderly, babushka’ed landlady.
🔮 If Zach Cregger’s career tells us anything, it’s that starting out as a comedian might be the best training for becoming a horror filmmaker.
🔮 The show worked like this: A crusading organization called Perverted Justice would initiate conversations in online chatrooms designed to attract potential sex offenders.
🔮 Ye-ji is thrilled to have found Mi-ok and Ho-seok as subjects—she’s particularly interested in the melancholic Ho-seok, who, she believes, could be the dramatic key her project.
🔮 Writer-director Martin McDonagh’s Wild Horse Nine—playing in competition here at the Venice Film Festival—might prompt you to ask those questions, though it doesn’t fully answer them.
Also by Stephanie Zacharek
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 11 articles by Stephanie Zacharek →

Topics

A24 American Theranos the Telluride Film Festival

Subjects

Holmes PERSON · 8× Fielder PERSON · 7× Evans PERSON · 4× Oppenheim PERSON · 4× Albert PERSON · 1× American NORP · 1× David Maysles PERSON · 1× Edie Bouvier Beale PERSON · 1× Lance Oppenheim PERSON · 1× Nathan Fielder PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Oppenheim, his friend and filmmaking partner, is the director behind the recent nonfiction feature Primetime, as well as docs like the 2020 Some Kind of Heaven, which turns a sarcastic eye on the Florida retirement community known as The Villages—the ultimate in shooting-fish-in-a-barrel filmmaking.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-16
🔮 Warning: This post contains spoilers for You Can See Everything We might like to believe that documentary filmmakers are adamantly neutral parties, aiming their cameras at people who are just being themselves and, later, turning whatever the camera captures into objective truth.
2026-10-16 · TIME
Elizabeth Holmes Is Not the Problem With You Can See Everything · assertive framing

Claims (54 extracted, 7 hedged)

Warning: This post contains spoilers for You Can See Everything We might like to believe that documentary filmmakers are adamantly neutral parties, aiming their cameras at people who are just being themselves and, later, turning whatever the camera captures into objective truth. uncertain
camera → contain → truth
But because documentaries are, for now, made by humans and not robots, pure objectivity is impossible. asserted
objectivity → make → humans
When Albert and David Maysles captured Little Edie Bouvier Beale’s exuberant flag-twirling dance in Grey Gardens, they weren’t just casually showing us some random American eccentric in an outlandish headscarf; they were both in awe of her and, at least somewhat, laughing at her. asserted
they → capture → her
The sequence is funny, jaw-dropping, a little sad. asserted
sequence → drop → ?
It may not tell us what to think, but its job is to lead us there. uncertain
job → tell → us
Since its surprise debut at the Telluride Film Festival earlier this fall, You Can See Everything, directed by Nathan Fielder and Lance Oppenheim, has been widely praised as a groundbreaking documentary work, one that will change the face of nonfiction filmmaking forever. asserted
that → see → filmmaking
The first half of Fielder and Oppenheim’s film chronicles the 34 days leading up to the incarceration of Elizabeth Holmes, founder of the blood-testing technology company Theranos. asserted
half → chronicle → company
Holmes was convicted of fraud in 2018 and sentenced to just over 11 years in federal prison, commencing in May 2023. uncertain
Holmes → convict → May
To make this documentary, Fielder, Oppenheim, and their crew camped out with Holmes, her partner Billy Evans, and their two small children, observing their lives up-close—or as up-close as possible. asserted
Fielder → make → lives
The filmmakers had come at Evans’ urging: some time earlier, he and Holmes, who had completely withdrawn from the public eye, had approached A24 to see if the studio might be interested in making a documentary about them. uncertain
studio → come → them
In a roundabout fashion, Fielder and Oppenheim became the filmmakers charged with the task. asserted
Fielder → become → task
Early in the film, we hear Evans explaining that he wanted the world to get an accurate picture of the woman he knew, a devoted partner and mother, whom he felt had been unfairly villainized. asserted
he → hear → woman
The film’s title comes from Holmes’ spoken promise to Fielder: She vowed to keep nothing hidden from the filmmakers—but did she fulfill that promise? asserted
she → come → promise
Throughout You Can See Everything, Fielder is often on-screen, with Oppenheim working behind the scenes. asserted
Oppenheim → see → scenes
Over and over again, Holmes assures Fielder she has nothing to hide, and over and over again, his probing—if insistently performative—questions catch her in slippery half-truths. asserted
questions → assure → truths
Her transparency, to paraphrase the words of Courtney Love, is so real it’s beyond fake. asserted
it → paraphrase → Love
When Fielder isn’t asking the questions, he’s lurking behind the scenes, listening in on Evans and Holmes’ conversations with a headset; when he hears something he can’t believe, his eyes widen dramatically, or his brow furrows, or his jaw hangs as slack as that of a puppet. asserted
jaw → ask → puppet
The audience I saw the movie with giggled every time. asserted
I → see → movie
If this is the future of documentary filmmaking—or at least that of its loopier cousin, creative-nonfiction filmmaking—many of us will come to miss the late Frederick Wiseman even more than we already do. asserted
we → come → Wiseman
Holmes and her let-it-all-hang-out evasiveness isn’t the problem here. asserted
it → let → ?
If anything, her whirligig insistence on her inability to lie, or even inadvertently deceive, is at least a kind of self-invented honesty. asserted
insistence → lie → honesty
She spins out phrases like “All I know is my truth,” before speaking tearfully about her fear of being separated from her family. asserted
I → spin → family
As the camera rolls, Holmes works overtime to convince the filmmakers, and us, of her innocence, with Evans butting in frequently to add his 3,268 cents—2 would never be enough. asserted
cents—2 → roll → innocence
(He keeps insisting that the couple have plans to start a new company, though he seems to have more invested in this scheme than his partner does.) asserted
partner → insist → scheme
Holmes is one of those smile-talkers—people who grin as words pour out of their mouths. asserted
words → grin → mouths
One of her tricks is to never break eye contact, and we can see her working this voodoo on Fielder. asserted
her → break → Fielder
I’ve never seen eyes like this, except on creepy European-made porcelain dolls from the 19th century. asserted
I → see → century
Are we seriously going to trust this woman? asserted
we → go → woman
We’re not, and Fielder doesn’t seem to be headed in that direction either, at least at first. asserted
Fielder → seem → direction
This is a dense picture—there’s almost too much to unpack, if you can be bothered to care about any of it. asserted
you → ’ → it
But by design, Fielder is as much a player in You Can See Everything as Holmes is, and your feelings about the film overall will depend on how much of him you can take. asserted
you → see → him
Fielder has made a name for himself with the shows Nathan for You and The Rehearsal, in which he essentially makes himself look foolish, a little, and makes others look foolish, a lot. asserted
others → make → which
Oppenheim, his friend and filmmaking partner, is the director behind the recent nonfiction feature Primetime, as well as docs like the 2020 Some Kind of Heaven, which turns a sarcastic eye on the Florida retirement community known as The Villages—the ultimate in shooting-fish-in-a-barrel filmmaking. asserted
which → turn → filmmaking
It’s hard to say who’s more responsible for You Can See Everything’s stultifying smirkiness, at least in the first half; these two are clearly of like mind. asserted
two → ’ → mind
But there’s a major shift in the film's second half, one that suddenly, and blessedly, makes it at least watchable. asserted
it → ’ → half
(If you don’t want to know anything about this twist, stop reading here.) asserted
you → want → twist
The film's second section picks up two years after Holmes has gone off to prison, which means Fielder and Oppenheim have been deprived of their subject. asserted
Fielder → pick → subject
What little access they might have had is severely curtailed by Evans, who now seems less like a caring husband and more like an evil puppetmaster, eager to use his wife’s words and likeness for his own gain. uncertain
who → curtail → gain
(His increasing aura of evil is unnerving, especially when you consider that he’s almost fully in charge of raising the couple’s two young children.) asserted
he → increase → children
Fielder and Oppenheim are at a loss—until it occurs to them to enlist the help of Amanda Seyfried, who played Holmes in the 2022 miniseries The Dropout, both to stand in for the disgraced entrepreneur and to weigh in on her plight. asserted
who → occur → plight
…and 14 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support