The Aporia
Horgan, C. (2026, October 16). Take it from the Harper government: Carney's managerial style is working now, but it won't work forever. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/take-it-from-the-harper-government-carney-s-managerial-style-is-working-now-but-it-won-t-work-forever/article_9352612a-2975-4275-bcaf-93174c1a5d50.html
Horgan, Colin. “Take it from the Harper government: Carney's managerial style is working now, but it won't work forever.” Toronto Star, 16 Oct. 2026, https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/take-it-from-the-harper-government-carney-s-managerial-style-is-working-now-but-it-won-t-work-forever/article_9352612a-2975-4275-bcaf-93174c1a5d50.html.
Horgan, Colin. “Take it from the Harper government: Carney's managerial style is working now, but it won't work forever.” Toronto Star, October 16, 2026. https://www.thestar.com/opinion/contributors/take-it-from-the-harper-government-carney-s-managerial-style-is-working-now-but-it-won-t-work-forever/article_9352612a-2975-4275-bcaf-93174c1a5d50.html.
Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.
Mark Carney's managerial approach to running Canada has been compared to former Prime Minister Stephen Harper's leadership style during his time in office. In 2006, Harper's Conservative government was credited with providing clear direction and efficient governance after the scandal-ridden years of the Chrétien-Martin era. Finance minister Jim Flaherty attributed Canadians' support for Harper to their desire for a "real leader" who could get things done, despite some disagreement with his policies.
The comparison is based on how both Carney and Harper consolidate decision-making power, often bypassing cabinet members or government departments in the process. This style resonates with Canadians seeking effective management, even if it means adopting a less collaborative approach. While this strategy has been successful for now, concerns are raised about its sustainability over time.
The parallels between Carney's and Harper's styles were highlighted through quotes from 2006 when David Emerson, then minister for international trade, described Harper as a "hard-ass" in a positive light due to his principles and vision. The current environment mirrors the earlier period of seeking strong leadership after political instability, making comparisons relevant once again.
Canadians were hungry for someone who could simply run things correctly — even if it meant being a bit of a jerk.
Harper’s approach also fit the bill until it didn’t. Just over a year after Emerson had given his “compliment,” Canadians were starting to interpret it more negatively.
But this approach to governance has a shelf life, as Harper demonstrated when his desire to remake the federal government in his own image put him in direct conflict with other institutions. That helped turn the public’s perception: voters had respected his ability to get things done, but now they were recoiling at what suddenly felt like arrogance.
Carney’s not doing the exact same thing, but the Star’s recent reporting on his attempts to consolidate decision-making, disregard his cabinet and do end-runs around government departments certainly has the echo of the Harper years.