Anika Wells opens door to lawsuits against big tech companies

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
Cite

Armstrong, C. (2026, October 15). Anika Wells opens door to lawsuits against big tech companies. ABC News (AU). https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-10-15/anika-wells-opens-door-to-big-tech-lawsuits/107271002

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-10-15 · by Clare Armstrong

Quick Summary

Communications Minister Anika Wells announced that the Labor government is considering allowing individuals to sue tech companies for online harms under proposed digital safety laws. Despite concessions made to address concerns about censorship, the Coalition remains opposed to the legislation. A Senate inquiry will review the bill, which includes measures like protecting minors from harmful content and giving adults options to limit exposure to certain types of content. Greens are pushing for tougher penalties within these new regulations.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-15, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Anika Wells, Australia's communications minister, clarified that under new online safety laws being proposed by Labor, Australians can still listen to manosphere podcasts or voice conspiracy theories like doubting the moon landing without restrictions. She emphasized these laws are not about censorship but rather about ensuring tech companies take responsibility for harmful content targeting vulnerable groups, such as minors exposed to extremist material or eating disorder content.

Wells also mentioned considering updates to digital duty of care laws that would allow individual Australians to sue big tech companies if they violate the new rules. This move is seen as a compromise to gain support from the Greens and address concerns raised by critics who fear government overreach. A Senate inquiry will further scrutinize the legislation, with the Greens pushing for even stricter penalties against tech firms that fail to uphold digital safety standards.

Written for “Anika Wells On Tech Companies And Speech Laws” on 2026-10-15, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence medium
Leaning: leans left for article 81471 (medium confidence, 4 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-15

Story

📰 Anika Wells On Tech Companies And Speech Laws
Technology · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 32 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles discuss Anika Wells's statement regarding proposed updates to online safety laws that would allow individual Australians to sue big tech companies, addressing the same legislative development and reactions from political parties.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 33 📰 publisher trust 72
“Article A focuses on the scrapping of controversial ministerial discretion in proposed online safety laws, while Article B discusses Labor's consideration of allowing lawsuits against big tech companies for online harms. These are related but distinct developments.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 31 📰 publisher trust 72
“The articles discuss related developments but describe different stages or positions of the ongoing debate rather than a single specific occurrence.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 19 📰 publisher trust 61
“The articles discuss related legislative efforts but focus on different aspects: one on penalizing platforms promoting gender-based violence, while the other discusses broader legal avenues for suing tech companies.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 25 📰 publisher trust 67
“While both articles discuss legislative efforts to regulate big tech, they describe different phases or aspects of the process, rather than a single specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
43
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
5 of 43 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
72/100
ABC News (AU)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 3057 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Clare Armstrong
23 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A Senate inquiry will scrutinise the legislation as the Greens push for tougher penalties and greater powers for individuals to sue tech companies.
🔮 In short: The Greens want Australians to be able to sue tech companies for online harms and will push for tougher fines to strengthen Labor's Digital Duty of Care proposal.
🔮 Such was the contrast in reception, that anyone might reasonably question why Mr Taylor had bothered to attend this year's Australian Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at all.
🔮 Federal government to fund surcharge costs to delay ATO credit card payment ban after business backlash In short: The Australian Taxation Office will delay the implementation of its controversial credit card ban for up to a year.
🔮 Australia would require AI companies to prove they are properly testing models and preventing harm under proposed new laws modelled on banking and aviation safety rules.
2026-10-08 · assertive framing · Australia wants to regulate AI like banks and airlines
🔮 In short: The Coalition is being warned its migration plan would worsen skills shortages and damage the economy.
🔮 It would go further than Labor's migration targets while increasing skilled migration, but the Coalition has not released modelling of the broader economic impact.
🔮 Legal cigarette sales jump 55 per cent in Queensland after black market crackdown In short: Legal tobacco sales rose 55 per cent in Queensland after the state legislated stronger powers to shut illegal shops. Calls to Quitline more than doubled in the days after major enforcement operations, suggesting the crackdown may encourage some smokers to quit.
🔮 In short: Labor will target lawyers and migration agents who profit from visa applications and protection claims with little or no prospect of success.
🔮 After winning the Greens leadership on Wednesday, Senator Shoebridge was asked if he would "mend the bridges" between his party and the local Jewish community.
Also by Clare Armstrong
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 23 articles by Clare Armstrong →

Topics

Australians Coalition Greens Labor Senate

Subjects

Coalition ORG · 6× Wells PERSON · 5× Labor ORG · 4× Greens ORG · 3× Senate ORG · 3× Australians NORP · 2× Henderson PERSON · 2× Anika Wells PERSON · 1× Communications ORG · 1× the National Press Club ORG · 1×

Narrative

Small Business Minister Anne Aly said there would be further regulatory guidance provided to those impacted by the duty, noting the average business website did not carry many safety risks. "Providers of low-risk services, like websites and applications run by small businesses, will have minimal obligations," she said.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-15
🔮 A Senate inquiry will scrutinise the legislation as the Greens push for tougher penalties and greater powers for individuals to sue tech companies.
2026-10-15 · ABC News (AU)
Anika Wells opens door to lawsuits against big tech companies · assertive framing

Claims (43 extracted, 5 hedged)

In short: Labor is weighing up stronger legal avenues for people harmed by online platforms as it tries to secure parliamentary support for its digital safety laws. asserted
it → weigh → laws
Despite concessions aimed at addressing concerns about censorship and press freedom, the Coalition remains firmly opposed. asserted
Coalition → aim → censorship
A Senate inquiry will scrutinise the legislation as the Greens push for tougher penalties and greater powers for individuals to sue tech companies. asserted
individuals → scrutinise → companies
Labor is open to giving Australians the right to sue tech companies for online harms under new digital safety laws and has questioned why the Coalition would "deal themselves out" of talks. asserted
Coalition → give → talks
Communications Minister Anika Wells said the federal government would contemplate a Greens proposal to give individuals the right to take legal action against the platforms as she pushed back on claims the digital duty of care could be misused for political censorship. uncertain
duty → say → censorship
Labor has scrapped proposed controversial ministerial powers to designate additional harms and bolstered protections for journalistic content, but the Coalition remains opposed to the bill. asserted
Coalition → scrap → bill
The government has added three harm categories, including the creation of fake nude material, to the proposal, which has been sent to a Senate inquiry due to report back before parliament rises at the end of November. asserted
parliament → add → November
In an address to the National Press Club today, Ms Wells said the duty was "not a stepping stone for regulating misinformation and disinformation". asserted
duty → say → misinformation
"If adults listen to manosphere podcasts, or people post their views about the government, or make memes, or want to say the Moon landing was fake, they can continue to do so without restriction," she said. asserted
she → listen → restriction
Earlier, Ms Wells introduced the legislation to parliament that would require online services to take reasonable steps to protect underage users from harmful content and features, while platforms would have to limit adults' exposure to "serious harms". asserted
platforms → introduce → harms
The bill would also pave the way for regulation to give Australians over the age of 16 the option to turn off algorithmic recommendations on their social media feeds. asserted
regulation → pave → feeds
Coalition calls bill a 'dog's breakfast' asserted
Coalition → call → bill
Ms Wells said she was "confident" Labor could get the bill through the Senate, describing the Coalition's hostility to the proposal as "puzzling" given its past support of online safety measures. " uncertain
Labor → say → measures
It's on them to explain why they would want to deal themselves out of a law that is either the next logical step in a proud bipartisan history of online safety or, if this is so reprehensible, but they know that the Greens are supportive of the principles [and] want to see it amended, why they would deal themselves out of anything that might improve the bill," she said. uncertain
she → explain → bill
Shadow Communications Minister Sarah Henderson said the bill was a "dog's breakfast" and took issue with what she described as "vague" definitions of harms. asserted
she → say → harms
"We think this is a dangerous step in the wrong direction and this bill cannot be supported," she said. asserted
she → think → direction
The Coalition has repeatedly warned the bill would limit free speech and enable government control of what people could see and say online. uncertain
people → warn → what
But one of Senator Henderson's complaints about the latest draft was the broad exemption for material in the "public interest" to be published. asserted
material → publish → interest
"What does material in the public interest mean?" she said. asserted
she → mean → interest
Wells dismisses 'sock puppet' criticism The bill would allow the eSafety Commissioner and accredited researchers to set up fake "sock puppet" accounts to observe and test whether online platforms were complying with their duties. asserted
platforms → dismiss → duties
The regulator would be required to develop policies in consultation with the Australian Federal Police and report annually on their use, while university researchers would have to obtain ethics approval. asserted
researchers → require → approval
But the Senator Henderson suggested the fake accounts would be allowed to "crawl" the internet and gain unchecked access to real users. uncertain
accounts → suggest → users
Ms Wells said there was "absolutely nothing of the sort" permitted in the bill. asserted
Wells → say → bill
"I don't know how to be more emphatic," she said. asserted
she → know → ?
"It doesn't exist. asserted
It → exist → ?
Ms Wells said it was not "tenable" to argue the independent regulator would be "trying to spread government propaganda" rather than shut down pro-terror or eating disorder content going to young Australians. asserted
regulator → say → Australians
Greens seek tougher penalties, right to sue asserted
Greens → seek → penalties
Ms Wells signalled that Labor would consider a proposal put forward by the Greens that would allow private citizens to sue tech companies, including, potentially, through class action lawsuits. asserted
citizens → signal → lawsuits
"I think it's fair to say that our eSafety Commissioner does a marvellous join at enforcement and compliance, but it's a huge burden, and private right of action allows people to share that burden," she said. asserted
she → think → burden
With eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant due to finish her second term this year, Ms Wells left the door open to restructuring the independent agency to spread the workload among multiple commissioners. asserted
Wells → finish → commissioners
"It's certainly one solution I am considering at the moment, given the resourcing required for the digital duty of care and the value that … is rising sharply in complaints and people seeking recourse," she said. asserted
she → consider → recourse
Greens Communications spokeswoman Sarah Hanson-Young said she still wanted the bill strengthened to put "the fear of god" into big tech companies and demanded penalties be tied to social media platforms' global revenue. asserted
penalties → say → revenue
"We are sick and tired, as Australians and as consumers, of big tech running our lives," she said. asserted
she → run → lives
"We're sick and tired of having material shoved into our children's feeds that is dangerous and harmful. asserted
that → have → feeds
" Small businesses face 'minimal' impact Under the digital duty of care all online platforms and websites would be required to undertake an annual risk assessment, including small businesses. asserted
platforms → face → businesses
Small Business Minister Anne Aly said there would be further regulatory guidance provided to those impacted by the duty, noting the average business website did not carry many safety risks. "Providers of low-risk services, like websites and applications run by small businesses, will have minimal obligations," she said. asserted
she → say → obligations
Teach Us Consent founder and chief executive Chanel Contos said she welcomed the duty and its provisions that would allow Australians to switch off their algorithmically recommended content. asserted
Australians → say → content
"Opt-in doesn't ban algorithms — it makes them optional," she said. asserted
she → opt → algorithms
"Nothing about this stops people, organisations or businesses reaching audiences through algorithmic feeds. asserted
people → stop → feeds
It just means people get to choose that feed, rather than have it forced on them. asserted
it → mean → them
…and 3 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support