Court hears of intense campaign for public influence in Galloway case

Read the original at The Globe and Mail ↗
Cite

Hager, M. (2026, October 15). Court hears of intense campaign for public influence in Galloway case. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-court-hears-of-intense-campaign-for-public-influence-in-galloway-case/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Globe and Mail · collected 2026-10-15 · by Mike Hager

Quick Summary

In B.C. Supreme Court on Wednesday, Steven Galloway testified about behind-the-scenes efforts to influence public opinion after he faced sexual assault allegations at the University of British Columbia in 2015. Both Galloway and his accuser were involved in attempts to garner sympathy; Galloway mentioned seeing drafts of supportive letters before they were published, while an email revealed that A.B.'s friend Mandi Gray considered boycotting his book publisher. The court hearing showed how both parties worked to shape public perception following the controversy, which led to a firestorm over due process and resulted in Galloway being awarded over $220,000 after arbitration for privacy violations during his dismissal from UBC.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-15, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On Tuesday and Wednesday this week at the B.C. Supreme Court, Steven Galloway testified in his defamation lawsuit against a former student, identified as A.B., who accused him of sexual assault and harassment. The trial has been ongoing for seven days and was initially scheduled to last 13 more days. Galloway, who is suing A.B. along with three others, revealed that the University of British Columbia provided him with reasons for his dismissal in 2016, which included an extramarital affair but kept other reasons confidential. During the trial, evidence emerged suggesting both sides attempted to gain public support; Galloway testified about seeing drafts of letters supporting his position from fellow writers and authors like Margaret Atwood and Madeleine Thien.

Written for “Galloway Case Influence Campaign” on 2026-10-15, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 81064 · logged 2026-10-15

Story

📰 Galloway Case Influence Campaign
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 24 📰 publisher trust 52
“The articles describe different days of testimony in the ongoing legal proceedings, not the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
22
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
2 of 22 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
52/100
The Globe and Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Globe and Mail · 732 article(s) · 27 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 27 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Mike Hager
15 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 His lawyers won a pre-trial motion this summer to keep the majority of his termination letter confidential, but Justice Neena Sharma is expected to weigh in Wednesday on a new motion by the counsel for the defendants to gain access to the redacted rationale for his firing.
🔮 The trial will not hear testimony from A.B.
🔮 But Mr. Burnett was allowed by the judge to pursue the discussion of financial compensation for A.B. because – if his client is awarded damages − it could point toward her malicious actions.
🔮 The trial will not hear testimony from A.B.
🔮 And so, he said, he was surprised to learn shortly afterward that his former partner had filed a sexual harassment complaint with the school’s administration – an allegation which would eventually publicly explode and torpedo his personal and professional life.
🔮 The woman whose allegations of sexual assault against Steven Galloway ended his career in academia will not testify and will not offer any evidence in a defamation case launched by the bestselling author, the trial in B.C. Supreme Court heard as it opened this morning.
🔮 This month will see the first overlap of municipal and provincial elections since British Columbia’s Election Act was passed in 1995.
🔮 The dispatcher told him they would send a car there and when the couple looked again, the men were gone.
🔮 Lorne Doerkson spent his birthday on Thursday doing media interviews as the new leader of the Conservative Party of B.C., a role he did not seek out but was suddenly appointed to last week, and that could see him elected premier by Halloween.
🔮 And he said his son might still be alive today if police had acted earlier, given he was among the last of the known Canadian victims.
Also by Mike Hager
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Mike Hager →

Topics

A.B. B.C. Supreme Court CanLit UBC University of British Columbia

Subjects

Galloway PERSON · 15× UBC ORG · 6× A.B. ORG · 5× Gray PERSON · 3× Laskin PERSON · 2× Madeleine Thien PERSON · 2× Thien PERSON · 2× B.C. Supreme Court ORG · 1× Steven Galloway PERSON · 1× University of British Columbia ORG · 1×

Narrative

On Tuesday, Mr. Galloway testified that university’s administration provided him with a “laundry list” of reasons for his dismissal in 2016, but apart from the extramarital affair with the student in his creative-writing program, those reasons remain secret. The trial, which has gone on for seven days and was initially scheduled to last a further 13, continues Monday with other witnesses.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-15
2026-10-15 · The Globe and Mail
Court hears of intense campaign for public influence in Galloway case · assertive framing

Claims (22 extracted, 2 hedged)

Both Steven Galloway and the former University of British Columbia student who accused the bestselling author of sexual assault and harassment worked behind-the-scenes to curry sympathy amid a national firestorm over the allegations, B.C. Supreme Court heard Wednesday. asserted
Court → accuse → allegations
Mr. Galloway, who is suing the woman known as A.B. due to a publication ban and three others for defamation, testified that after he was fired as chair of the university’s creative writing program in June, 2016, he was asked by fellow CanLit star and UBC alumna Madeleine Thien to read a draft of her letter to their alma mater excoriating it for the university’s treatment of Mr. Galloway. asserted
he → sue → Galloway
He testified Tuesday that he had also seen a copy of the controversial ‘UBC Accountable letter’ calling for the university to open an independent investigation into his firing before it was published. asserted
it → testify → firing
The letter was signed by dozens of prominent writers, including Margaret Atwood. asserted
letter → sign → Atwood
During cross-examination Wednesday, Aria Laskin, counsel for defendant Mandi Gray, presented Mr. Galloway with a private e-mail involving her client from the days following Mr. Galloway’s suspension. asserted
Laskin → present → suspension
In that e-mail, court heard, Ms. Gray, an author based in Toronto, discussed the idea of launching a boycott against Mr. Galloway’s book publisher Penguin Random House. asserted
Gray → hear → publisher
In the e-mail, Ms. Gray notes A.B. agreed with the idea. asserted
A.B. → note → idea
“She seems to support it as long as it’s not tied to her in any way,” Ms. Laskin read from the e-mail while questioning Mr. Galloway. asserted
Laskin → seem → Galloway
The court did not hear who Ms. Gray was corresponding with. asserted
Gray → hear → who
Wednesday’s revelations showed how Mr. Galloway and A.B., who had an extramarital affair from 2011 to 2013, were privy to some of the efforts from allies to sway public perception after the allegations surfaced in late 2015 to torpedo Mr. Galloway’s career. asserted
allegations → show → career
Mr. Galloway testified Wednesday that Ms. Thien only asked him to look at her letter beforehand to verify its accuracy and he ended up sending along a few minor suggestions. asserted
he → testify → suggestions
“Madeleine Thien does not need me editing her work,” he said. asserted
he → need → work
He agreed with Ms. Laskin that Ms. Thien’s letter, the UBC Accountable letter, his own interview with The Globe and Mail in 2018 and his other efforts to publicly defend himself against the original sexual assault allegations didn’t help his public image. asserted
letter → agree → image
UBC’s announcement of a formal investigation of “serious allegations” involving Mr. Galloway in 2015 led to an online firestorm over Mr. Galloway’s right to due process versus the rights of his alleged victim. asserted
announcement → involve → victim
A retired judge hired by UBC to investigate A.B.’s claims found he had sexually harassed her and found other instances of misconduct leading to his firing, but did not find that he sexually assaulted the woman. uncertain
he → retire → woman
The school fired Mr. Galloway in 2016 without severance, but two years later, an arbitrator awarded him more than $220,000 in two separate awards for violating his privacy during the process of suspending and dismissing him. asserted
arbitrator → fire → him
He was never charged with a crime and in 2018 he launched his defamation suit, arguing the defendants repeated claims online that he had sexually assaulted a student. uncertain
he → charge → student
A.B. is not testifying and, at the start of the trial, her lawyer Arden Beddoes told the court that she was withdrawing her defences of truth and fair comment – but not admitting that she spread lies about her former romantic partner. asserted
she → testify → partner
Mr. Beddoes said she had tried to kill herself twice in recent months because of the stress of the ordeal. asserted
she → say → ordeal
Defendant Glynnis Kirchmeier, a former UBC student who is now studying law and representing herself in the trial, spent the end of Wednesday cross-examining Mr. Galloway. asserted
who → study → Galloway
Justice Neena Sharma began Wednesday’s hearing by denying a request from the defendants the day before to gain access to an unredacted version of Mr. Galloway’s dismissal letter. asserted
Sharma → begin → letter
On Tuesday, Mr. Galloway testified that university’s administration provided him with a “laundry list” of reasons for his dismissal in 2016, but apart from the extramarital affair with the student in his creative-writing program, those reasons remain secret. The trial, which has gone on for seven days and was initially scheduled to last a further 13, continues Monday with other witnesses. asserted
which → testify → witnesses
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support