Steven Galloway gets cross-examined on UBC’s reasons for his termination

Read the original at The Globe and Mail ↗
The Globe and Mail · collected 2026-10-14 · by Mike Hager

Quick Summary

Steven Galloway, a former University of British Columbia (UBC) creative-writing professor, is facing cross-examination in his defamation trial against UBC and others. He claims UBC fabricated reasons for his 2016 dismissal to shield the university's reputation after he was accused of sexual assault by a student. The court heard that apart from an extramarital affair with the student, Galloway’s termination letter lists undisclosed misconduct allegations. His lawyers won a motion this summer to keep most details of the termination confidential, but UBC is contesting this decision. During the trial, Galloway argued that UBC is corrupt and not committed to following rules.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of October 14, 2026, bestselling author Steven Galloway is testifying in a defamation trial against the University of British Columbia (UBC) that has been ongoing for eight years. During this week's proceedings at the B.C. Supreme Court, Galloway claims UBC fabricated reasons to fire him in June 2016 after he was accused of sexual assault and harassment by a former student in November 2015. His lawyers previously won a motion to keep most of his termination letter confidential, but now the court is considering whether to grant access to the redacted parts of that letter. Galloway argues that UBC listed numerous unproven allegations as reasons for his dismissal beyond the confirmed extramarital affair with the student.

Written for “Steven Galloway Cross Examination” on 2026-10-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but all 2 of its quote(s) are attributed speech - words the article quotes from someone, not the article's own narration, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 78262: attributed speech only · logged 2026-10-14

Story

📰 Steven Galloway Cross Examination
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Globe and Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 24 📰 publisher trust 52
“The articles describe different days of testimony in the defamation trial, with distinct focuses on book sales and UBC's reasons for termination.”

Cite this article

Hager, M. (2026, October 14). Steven Galloway gets cross-examined on UBC’s reasons for his termination. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-steven-galloway-gets-cross-examined-on-ubcs-reasons-for-his/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
2 of 24 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
52/100
The Globe and Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Globe and Mail · 705 article(s) · 26 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 26 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Mike Hager
14 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 His lawyers won a pre-trial motion this summer to keep the majority of his termination letter confidential, but Justice Neena Sharma is expected to weigh in Wednesday on a new motion by the counsel for the defendants to gain access to the redacted rationale for his firing.
🔮 The trial will not hear testimony from A.B.
🔮 But Mr. Burnett was allowed by the judge to pursue the discussion of financial compensation for A.B. because – if his client is awarded damages − it could point toward her malicious actions.
🔮 The trial will not hear testimony from A.B.
🔮 And so, he said, he was surprised to learn shortly afterward that his former partner had filed a sexual harassment complaint with the school’s administration – an allegation which would eventually publicly explode and torpedo his personal and professional life.
🔮 The woman whose allegations of sexual assault against Steven Galloway ended his career in academia will not testify and will not offer any evidence in a defamation case launched by the bestselling author, the trial in B.C. Supreme Court heard as it opened this morning.
🔮 This month will see the first overlap of municipal and provincial elections since British Columbia’s Election Act was passed in 1995.
🔮 The dispatcher told him they would send a car there and when the couple looked again, the men were gone.
🔮 Lorne Doerkson spent his birthday on Thursday doing media interviews as the new leader of the Conservative Party of B.C., a role he did not seek out but was suddenly appointed to last week, and that could see him elected premier by Halloween.
🔮 And he said his son might still be alive today if police had acted earlier, given he was among the last of the known Canadian victims.
Also by Mike Hager
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 14 articles by Mike Hager →

Topics

A.B. B.C. Supreme Court UBC the B.C. Supreme Court the University of British Columbia

Subjects

Galloway PERSON · 14× UBC ORG · 8× A.B. PERSON · 5× Sharma PERSON · 2× Arden Beddoes PERSON · 1× B.C. Supreme Court ORG · 1× Neena Sharma PERSON · 1× Steven Galloway PERSON · 1× the B.C. Supreme Court ORG · 1× the University of British Columbia ORG · 1×

Narrative

During the second week of the defamation trial Mr. Galloway has been pursuing for eight years, the former chair of UBC’s creative-writing program testified under cross-examination that the allegations, levelled by the woman in November, 2015, were false and asserted his June, 2016, termination was under the auspices of the post-secondary institution trumping up other instances of his misconduct.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-14
🔮 His lawyers won a pre-trial motion this summer to keep the majority of his termination letter confidential, but Justice Neena Sharma is expected to weigh in Wednesday on a new motion by the counsel for the defendants to gain access to the redacted rationale for his firing.
2026-10-14 · The Globe and Mail
Steven Galloway gets cross-examined on UBC’s reasons for his termination · assertive framing

Claims (24 extracted, 2 hedged)

Bestselling author Steven Galloway accused the administration of the University of British Columbia of making up excuses to fire him in order to protect the school’s reputation after a former student accused him of sexual assault and harassment. asserted
student → accuse → assault
Mr. Galloway told the B.C. Supreme Court Tuesday that the university’s administration provided him with a “laundry list” of reasons for his dismissal in 2016, but apart from the extramarital affair with the student in his creative-writing program, those reasons remain secret. asserted
reasons → tell → program
His lawyers won a pre-trial motion this summer to keep the majority of his termination letter confidential, but Justice Neena Sharma is expected to weigh in Wednesday on a new motion by the counsel for the defendants to gain access to the redacted rationale for his firing. asserted
defendants → win → firing
During the second week of the defamation trial Mr. Galloway has been pursuing for eight years, the former chair of UBC’s creative-writing program testified under cross-examination that the allegations, levelled by the woman in November, 2015, were false and asserted his June, 2016, termination was under the auspices of the post-secondary institution trumping up other instances of his misconduct. asserted
termination → pursue → misconduct
“You’re living in a world where UBC is an honourable, respectful, rule-following organization and you’re attempting to get me to engage with you as though that’s the case,” Mr. Galloway told Arden Beddoes, lead counsel for the woman known as A.B. due to a publication ban. asserted
Galloway → live → ban
“I believe they’re about as corrupt an institution as you’re likely to find and whatever rules that exist, they’re likely to make them up as they go.” asserted
they → believe → them
UBC did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday afternoon following Mr. Galloway’s testimony. asserted
UBC → respond → testimony
A B.C. Supreme Court judge began hearing Mr. Galloway’s defamation trial last week against A.B. and three others. asserted
judge → begin → A.B.
More than a dozen people originally named in his lawsuit have settled, including two UBC professors. asserted
people → name → professors
Mr. Galloway acknowledged in court that a former judge hired by UBC to investigate A.B.’s claims found he had sexually harassed her and found other instances of misconduct leading to his firing. uncertain
he → acknowledge → firing
The court has heard the former judge did not find that he sexually assaulted the woman. asserted
he → hear → woman
UBC’s announcement of a formal investigation of “serious allegations” involving Mr. Galloway in 2015 led to an online firestorm over Mr. Galloway’s right to due process versus the rights of his alleged victim. asserted
announcement → involve → victim
UBC fired Mr. Galloway in 2016 without severance, but two years later, an arbitrator awarded him more than $220,000 in two separate awards for violating his privacy during the process of suspending and dismissing him. asserted
arbitrator → fire → him
He was never charged with a crime and in 2018 he launched his defamation suit, arguing the defendants repeated claims online that he had sexually assaulted a student. uncertain
he → charge → student
On Tuesday, Mr. Beddoes showed the court a copy of Mr. Galloway’s termination letter and noted that the second, third, fourth and fifth pages were entirely redacted after Mr. Galloway’s lawyers secured an order this summer to keep the letter secret. asserted
lawyers → show → letter
Mr. Galloway’s lawyers argued the letter was unrelated to the core allegations of sexual assault levelled by A.B. Mr. Galloway conceded that he violated school policy and some of his conduct was “unprofessional, unethical,” and did not meet his standards or that of a UBC faculty member. asserted
some → argue → member
But, he testified, he shouldn’t have been fired for his actions. asserted
he → testify → actions
“Insofar as I was made aware at this time, there had been two tenured faculty members terminated in the recent decade: myself and the guy who stole millions of dollars from a First Nations dental clinic,” he testified. asserted
he → make → clinic
Lawyers for the defendants have argued Justice Sharma should allow Mr. Galloway’s termination letter to be made public so he can be cross-examined about his actions. asserted
he → argue → actions
Justice Sharma reserved her decision. asserted
Sharma → reserve → decision
She is also expected to rule this week on a Globe and Mail application to get access to an exhibit detailing A.B.’s draft negligence lawsuit against UBC for up to $3-million, which was brought up in court last week. asserted
which → expect → court
On Friday, Mr. Galloway testified there was no official prohibition on sexual relationships between students and faculty, and that he knows of “numerous instances” of similar relationships in the university’s faculty of arts. asserted
he → testify → arts
He testified that “absent A.B.’s sex assault allegations nobody had any reason to think negatively” about him. asserted
nobody → testify → him
Mr. Beddoes and counsel for two of the other three defendants argued Tuesday that’s not the case. asserted
that → argue → defendants
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support