New on SCOTUSBlog: "Witnessing a reorientation of the First and Second Amendments on the Roberts court"

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Blackman, J. (2026, October 14). New on SCOTUSBlog: "Witnessing a reorientation of the First and Second Amendments on the Roberts court". Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/14/new-on-scotusblog-witnessing-a-reorientation-of-the-first-and-second-amendments-on-the-roberts-court/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Reason · collected 2026-10-14 · by Josh Blackman

Quick Summary

Law professors contributing to SCOTUSBlog discuss how interpretations of the Religion Clauses and the Second Amendment have shifted significantly over the past two decades on the Roberts court. The essay contrasts current judicial enforcement with practices from 2006, highlighting a dramatic change in constitutional law perspectives. The next piece in this series will examine alterations to Congress’s powers, presidential executive actions, and interbranch power dynamics.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As reported by Josh Blackman on Reason Magazine on October 14, 2026, SCOTUSBlog has published an essay focusing on significant shifts in constitutional law over the past two decades regarding the First and Second Amendments under the Roberts court. The piece highlights that twenty years ago, the Supreme Court strictly enforced separation of church and state, reviewed free exercise rights deferentially, and did not enforce the Second Amendment. In contrast, recent changes have seen the court take a more active role in protecting religious freedoms and interpreting the Second Amendment. The essay is part of a series examining broader changes in constitutional law under the current Supreme Court's leadership.

Written for “Supreme Court Reorientation On Rights” on 2026-10-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 79838 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-14

Story

📰 Supreme Court Reorientation On Rights
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
6
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 6 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 721 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Blackman
67 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 The regulations for Freedmen schools in Texas provided that classes would begin at 9 A.M. and "[t]he morning Exercises will commence with either the singing of an appropriate hymn, or prayer, or the reading of the Scriptures."
🔮 Kyle asks: Well, I don't know how much coverage of the court you read, but you may not be surprised to learn that one light motif is that you are brooding figure.
🔮 Just as there are no doubt those on the bench who have strong ambitions for future office, there are others who are happy to be public servants, but who would be just as happy earning their living by some other means.
2026-10-06 · assertive framing · Lurching Through The Audition Trap
🔮 "But within a relatively short period of time, the thought occurred to me, and I think to the others in the majority, that this would endanger us.
🔮 He could have served in government, but he didn't.
🔮 (Southwick's already fragile reputation would be irreparably tarnished by such a move.)
🔮 The conduct caused disturbances that would have resulted in violence had law enforcement not intervened.
🔮 "It follows that if the underpinning is removed, the increasing professionalism will also disappear.
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · Todd Butler's Problematic Publications
🔮 In December 2017, I wrote in National Review that Republican-appointed judges should consider taking senior status so President Trump could fill those seats.
2026-10-01 · assertive framing · When Judges Pick Their Law Clerks As Replacements
🔮 Since he joined the Court, Roberts and his family would seek solace from the swamp at Hupper Island after the Court dismisses for the term.
Also by Josh Blackman
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 67 articles by Josh Blackman →

Topics

SCOTUSBlog the First and Second Amendments the Religion Clauses the Second Amendment the Supreme Court

Subjects

Congress ORG · 1× Randy Barnett PERSON · 1× SCOTUSBlog ORG · 1× The Volokh PERSON · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

It begins: Twenty years ago, the Supreme Court strictly enforced the separation of church and state, deferentially reviewed restrictions on free exercise rights, and played no role in enforcing the Second Amendment.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-14

Claims (6 extracted, 0 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent SCOTUSBlog has published the latest essay from me and Randy Barnett on the recent changes in constitutional law. asserted
SCOTUSBlog → publish → law
This entry focuses on the Religion Clauses and the Second Amendment. asserted
entry → focus → Clauses
It begins: Twenty years ago, the Supreme Court strictly enforced the separation of church and state, deferentially reviewed restrictions on free exercise rights, and played no role in enforcing the Second Amendment. asserted
Court → begin → Amendment
This was the state of the law when one of us began law school in the fall of 2006. asserted
one → begin → 2006
What a difference two decades has made for the First and Second Amendments. asserted
decades → make → Amendments
The next installment in this series considers the changes to Congress' enumerated powers, the president's executive powers, and the separation of powers between those branches. asserted
installment → consider → branches
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support