Geof Stone and I on "The State of Free Speech in 2026" (from the National Constitution Center)

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Volokh, E. (2026, September 11). Geof Stone and I on "The State of Free Speech in 2026" (from the National Constitution Center). Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/09/10/geof-stone-and-i-on-the-state-of-free-speech-in-2026-from-the-national-constitution-center/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-09-11 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

The National Constitution Center podcast "The State of Free Speech in 2026" features Geof Stone and the author discussing free speech. No specific numbers or key statistics are mentioned. The article does not delve into the content of the discussion but rather an enthusiastic endorsement from the author, who participated in the event. It appears to be a promotional piece for the podcast and Reason magazine.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-11, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Eugene Volokh, a law professor and author at The Volokh Conspiracy blog, participated in a discussion titled "The State of Free Speech in 2026" organized by the National Constitution Center and featured on Reason Magazine's platform. Volokh predicts that readers will find the conversation engaging and informative. The event likely covers topics relevant to free speech and legal perspectives from mostly law professors who are often libertarian or independent thinkers.

Written for “Free Speech Discussion 2026” on 2026-10-27, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Free Speech Discussion 2026
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads centre and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 4 of 34 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A discusses a court decision (Flannery v. Eckenwiler) involving Eric Flannery's bar, while Article B is about a podcast discussion on free speech in 2026”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
2
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 2 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Centre
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 944 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
163 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Indictment alleges that Holmes posted on that account several statements against the Jewish community and Israel, including: "The jew will be destroyed and discarded," "From the river to the sea every Jew will die," "You inbred people will all die," and "Die Jew."
🔮 When reviewing whether the evidence was sufficient to support the issuance [or extension] of a 258E order, we consider [consistently with the statutory requirements] whether, "by a preponderance of the evidence, together with all permissible inferences," the judge could have found "that the defendant had committed '[three] or more acts of willful and malicious conduct aimed at a specific person committed with the intent to cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property and that [did] in fact cause fear, intimidation, abuse or damage to property.'"
🔮 The Volokh Conspiracy Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change.
2026-10-25 · assertive framing · Open Thread
🔮 The Volokh Conspiracy Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change.
2026-10-24 · assertive framing · Open Thread
🔮 The original TRO—the one actually issued on July 20, 2025—named as plaintiffs eleven individuals and organizations who had never been party to the case; named as defendants two officials who were not actually sued; claimed, without evidence, that three post-secondary institutions had already cancelled DEI initiatives or programming because of the act; further declared, again without evidence, that staff at another school had been told not to discuss certain topics, including "historical interpretations involving systemic racism"; misquoted H.B. 1193 as applying to "race or sex stereotyping," "race or sex scapegoating," "critical race theory," and "institutional bias," despite none of these terms' appearing in the act's text; and referenced purported declarations of four individuals who do not appear in the record at all and may not even exist….
🔮 Critics fear that the Department of Justice's antitrust division will overlook mergers when it is convenient for the administration.
🔮 Body armor may be used more today than Defendants' understanding of its use in 1791.
2026-10-21 · assertive framing · Body Armor Ban Struck Down by N.Y. Federal Court
🔮 Readers might want to know: How often do civilians use guns to help stop shooters who pose ongoing threats to multiple people?
🔮 The reality is that our en banc court is often unable or unwilling to fix things at odds with Supreme Court precedent.
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent From a press release last month, just posted on Westlaw: N.C. Detective Agency, a Durham-based security company, will pay $65,231 in compensatory damages and back pay, and take other corrective actions to voluntarily resolve a religious discrimination investigation by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency announced today.
Also by Eugene Volokh
"AI Deepfakes in Court"
2026-10-25 · Reason
Open Thread
2026-10-25 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 163 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Reason

Subjects

Reason ORG · 1×

Narrative

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent I much enjoyed participating in this, and I expect many of our readers will much enjoy listening to it.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-11
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent I much enjoyed participating in this, and I expect many of our readers will much enjoy listening to it.

Claims (2 extracted, 0 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent I much enjoyed participating in this, and I expect many of our readers will much enjoy listening to it. asserted
many → enjoy → it
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent I much enjoyed participating in this, and I expect many of our readers will much enjoy listening to it. asserted
many → enjoy → it
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support