Trump Wants to Take the Guardrails Off AI. What Could Go Wrong?

The Bulwark · collected 2026-09-11 · by Catherine Rampell commentary
Read the original at The Bulwark ↗

Summary

Catherine Rampell and Andrew Egger discuss warnings about superintelligent AI, which they attribute in part to an Anthropic researcher's resignation over fears that the technology could threaten humanity. The authors question whether powerful AI can be controlled and express concern that the Trump administration may exacerbate the problem. They also mention reports of Sam Altman rejecting a proposal to give OpenAI shares to the government, but do not explore this further in their article. The piece is written from an opinion perspective, raising questions about the potential risks of unregulated AI development.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-11, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
9
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
44%
4 of 9 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
expected in commentary, which argues a position
Publisher trust
not scored
Commentary is not rated for newsroom trust
Outlets on this story
32
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-11 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Anthropic, an artificial intelligence firm, has faced public scrutiny over its partnership with the Pentagon and concerns about misuse of AI technology. Through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, The Intercept obtained documents revealing contracts between Anthropic and other tech giants like Google, OpenAI, and xAI, worth up to $200 million each, for developing AI tools aimed at enhancing military capabilities. Simultaneously, Anthropic reported that it had disrupted several attempts by individuals to misuse its models, including a case where someone tried to use the technology to engineer more harmful strains of viruses like chikungunya.

AI researchers and industry figures have issued stark warnings about the potential dangers posed by advanced AI systems, with some calling for urgent government regulation and international collaboration to manage AI development. The fear is that as AI rapidly improves, it could pose existential threats if not properly controlled, such as hacking early warning systems or synthesizing and spreading novel pathogens. This has led to debates over whether current safeguards are adequate and calls for voluntary slowdowns in the pace of AI advancement.

Jacob Coxon, a researcher at Anthropic who recently resigned, highlighted concerns about an impending race among companies like Anthropic and OpenAI toward superintelligent systems that could pose catastrophic risks. Despite these warnings, there is also skepticism about the immediacy and nature of such threats, with some arguing for more precise regulation focused on specific issues rather than general fears about AI's impact on society or employment.

Written for “AI Safety And Risks” on 2026-09-12, grounded in this article and the 31 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.35 for article 7933 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-11

Story

📰 AI Safety And Risks
Technology · 32 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 44% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 17% hedged 2 of 12 📰 publisher trust 58
“Both articles mention an Anthropic researcher quitting over fears about superintelligent AI and its potential threat to humanity.”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 29% hedged 2 of 7 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles report on the same researcher quitting Anthropic due to concerns about superintelligent AI threatening humanity”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 50% hedged 2 of 4 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles report on an Anthropic researcher quitting due to concerns that AI could kill humanity by the end of the decade”
Semafor
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 25% hedged 1 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles mention an Anthropic researcher quitting over fears of AI threatening humanity, and both refer to a similar time period (although only one article specifies a date)”
BBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 31% hedged 9 of 29 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles mention Anthropic's threat intelligence report and a researcher quitting over fears of superintelligent AI threats, and both are dated the same day (2026-09-11)”
Mother Jones
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 18% hedged 8 of 44 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles mention the resignation of an Anthropic researcher and the concerns about AI safety and superintelligence.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“Both articles mention the same incident involving an Anthropic researcher quitting over fears of losing control of AI technology”
WATCH: Insiders' new AI warning same event · 100%
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 50% hedged 1 of 2 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles report on a warning from an Anthropic researcher about potentially uncontrollable AI, mentioning the Trump administration's stance.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 6 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A mentions a general threat of AI bioterrorism and the misuse of powerful AI models by terrorist groups, while Article B specifically discusses Trump's proposal to remove 'guardrails' from AI development, without mentioning bioterrorism”
The Straits Times
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 25% hedged 2 of 8 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A refers to a speech by UN rights chief Volker Turk on September 7, while Article B does not mention any specific speech or date and appears to be discussing the topic of AI in general, including Trump's administration and a researcher quitting over fears about superintelligent AI”

Publisher

The Bulwark · 105 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Catherine Rampell
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 What Could Go Wrong?
🔮 But given that other news outlets are treating this as a serious policy idea, I guess I’m obligated to debunk it.1 The short version is this: Trump has made and broken similar promises many times before; this midterm “dividend” would be extremely expensive; it would be extraordinarily inflationary; the Republican trifecta could already have done this if they truly wanted to; and the mere suggestion of a Trump check will embolden all sorts of scam artists.
🔮 FEW THINGS IN AMERICA TODAY can win broad bipartisan support: Dolly Parton (may her memory be a blessing), interspecies friendships, and data-center bans are among them.
2026-08-28 · assertive framing · The Dawn of FAFO Economics
🔮 Catherine Rampell is joined by Bob Elliott, co-founder and chief investment officer at Unlimited, for his take on what’s behind Druckenmiller’s criticism and why Bessent’s bond-market strategy may be making things worse.
2026-08-26 · assertive framing · Wall Street Legend Calls Out Scott Bessent
🔮 Andrew Egger and Catherine Rampell give their takes on Canada’s decision to walk away from trade talks, Trump’s latest tariffs, and why the administration’s escalating fight with one of America’s closest allies could hit U.S. businesses and consumers hard.
2026-08-24 · assertive framing · Trump Blows Up His Own Trade Deal with Canada
Also by Catherine Rampell
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Catherine Rampell →

Topics

The Bulwark Washington

Subjects

Catherine Rampell PERSON · 3× Andrew Egger PERSON · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× Andrew PERSON · 1× Hunter Biden PERSON · 1× Jeff Stein PERSON · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1× The Bulwark ORG · 1× Washington GPE · 1×

Narrative

Read Andrew's Morning Shots newsletter: https://www.thebulwark.com/p/our-orange-napoleon-wants-a-big-arch-arlington-memorial-trump-burgum-ai-openai-anthropic-extinction-risk-911-september-11-canada-trade-war Jeff Stein — “Sam Altman Privately Rejected Giving OpenAI Shares to the Government”: https://washingtonsun.com/technology/sam-altman-privately-rejected-open-ai-government-equity Join Bulwark+ to unlock the rest Become a paying member of The Bulwark to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-11
🔮 What Could Go Wrong?
2026-09-11 · The Bulwark
Trump Wants to Take the Guardrails Off AI. What Could Go Wrong? · mixed framing

Claims (9 extracted, 4 hedged)

Trump Wants to Take the Guardrails Off AI. asserted
Trump → want → AI
What Could Go Wrong? uncertain
What → go → ?
Catherine Rampell and Andrew Egger take on the increasingly hard-to-dismiss warnings about superintelligent AI, after an Anthropic researcher quit over fears that the technology could eventually threaten humanity. uncertain
technology → take → humanity
Catherine Rampell and Andrew Egger take on the increasingly hard-to-dismiss warnings about superintelligent AI, after an Anthropic researcher quit over fears that the technology could eventually threaten humanity. uncertain
technology → take → humanity
They ask whether anyone can actually control increasingly powerful AI, whether the Trump administration is making the problem worse, and why Washington seems so unprepared for what may be coming. uncertain
what → ask → AI
Plus: Hunter Biden launches a meme coin—and it goes about as well as you’d expect. asserted
you → launch → coin
Read Andrew's Morning Shots newsletter: https://www.thebulwark.com/p/our-orange-napoleon-wants-a-big-arch-arlington-memorial-trump-burgum-ai-openai-anthropic-extinction-risk-911-september-11-canada-trade-war Jeff Stein — “Sam Altman Privately Rejected Giving OpenAI Shares to the Government”: https://washingtonsun.com/technology/sam-altman-privately-rejected-open-ai-government-equity Join Bulwark+ to unlock the rest Become a paying member of The Bulwark to get access to this post and other subscriber-only content. asserted
Altman → read → post
A subscription gets you: - Unlimited access to articles and newsletters including The Triad by JVL and Receipts by Catherine Rampell. - Ad-free editions of our shows (with transcripts) and member-only shows like The Secret Podcast. asserted
subscription → get → Podcast
Your support helps keep our work sustainable and available to those who cannot afford a membership. asserted
who → help → membership
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support