America Is Making Its Own Problems Worse

Read the original at The Bulwark ↗
Cite

Hertling, M. (2026, October 14). America Is Making Its Own Problems Worse. The Bulwark. https://www.thebulwark.com/p/america-is-making-its-own-problems-worse

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Bulwark · collected 2026-10-14 · by Mark Hertling commentary

Quick Summary

This article argues that recent U.S. decisions are complicating global security issues rather than resolving them. It highlights President Trump's announcement of purchasing Russian diesel fuel, which contradicts ongoing sanctions and undermines efforts to pressure Russia economically during its war with Ukraine. The author contends that such actions disconnect American foreign policy from strategic goals and deteriorate international trust in the U.S., particularly regarding commitments to allies like Saudi Arabia and Ukraine.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-14, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

As of 2026-10-14, The Bulwark published an analysis suggesting that American foreign policy decisions are creating more problems than they solve. Mark Hertling argues that actions like buying Russian oil to lower diesel prices could negatively impact Ukraine's ability to fight against Russia. Additionally, he mentions the launching of a Houthi missile towards Riyadh complicating Saudi Arabia’s military situation and the misconduct of an American ambassador or bizarre pronouncements by cabinet secretaries as factors undermining U.S. credibility with both allies and adversaries. The article highlights the complexity of global issues and calls for better leadership to connect these seemingly isolated events, emphasizing that singular decisions are often treated in isolation rather than holistically considering their broader impacts.

Written for “America's Policy Missteps” on 2026-10-14, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans left (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans left for article 78842 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-10-14

Story

📰 America's Policy Missteps
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 15% hedged 9 of 61
“The articles discuss different aspects of broader geopolitical issues involving Iran and America, rather than a single specific incident.”
Sneak Preview different event · 90%
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 1 📰 publisher trust 61
“The articles discuss similar themes but are distinct pieces with different dates and focuses.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
81
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
3 of 81 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Bulwark · 395 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Mark Hertling
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It might be good to look at the overlap of these issues.
2026-10-14 · assertive framing · America Is Making Its Own Problems Worse
🔮 The unequivocalness of the president’s prediction—made months into a war he repeatedly said would last only days—set off alarm bells in my head.
🔮 Saudi Arabia also has a separate National Guard that itself represents a substantial ground force, also equipped with some of the best military equipment America and Europe would sell them.
2026-09-23 · assertive framing · Why Saudi Arabia’s Houthi Problem Is Our Problem, Too
🔮 They also examine reports that the Pentagon may be undercounting U.S. military deaths in the Middle East, as well as the growing cost of the Iran war.
🔮 FOR DECADES, THE SECURITY architecture of the Persian Gulf rested on an assumption: When the gravest regional threats emerged, the United States would be the power around which its partners organized.
🔮 Mark explains why Iran and the Houthis appear to have the initiative, why the U.S. is increasingly responding rather than setting the terms of the conflict, and how Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan and NATO could become entangled as the war continues to expand.
🔮 He also brought a remarkable announcement: Britain will share classified technical information that Ukraine needs to eventually assemble the Storm Shadow long-range stealthy cruise missile (called SCALP in the French version).
2026-08-27 · assertive framing · Inside Ukraine’s Breakthrough Missile Deal
Also by Mark Hertling
The True Costs of the Iran War
2026-09-17 · The Bulwark
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Mark Hertling →

Topics

American Russia Russian Ukraine the United States

Subjects

American NORP · 7× Russia GPE · 5× Ukraine GPE · 5× Houthis NORP · 3× Putin PERSON · 3× Riyadh GPE · 3× Russian NORP · 3× Houthi NORP · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× the United States GPE · 2×

Narrative

It’s understandable, in a somewhat self-interested way, why a president would want to lower domestic energy prices before an election (though the president’s diesel deal, even if it goes through, is unlikely to have much effect on prices because the total volume being traded is about one day’s worth of American diesel consumption).
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-14
🔮 It might be good to look at the overlap of these issues.
2026-10-14 · The Bulwark
America Is Making Its Own Problems Worse · assertive framing

Claims (81 extracted, 3 hedged)

IT’S BECOMING INCREASINGLY DIFFICULT to keep track of the wars, threats, diplomatic disputes, military operations, and disconnected decisions affecting America’s security. asserted
IT → become → security
Every morning brings another White House announcement, another surprising military operation, another concern expressed by an American ally. asserted
morning → bring → ally
Yet while Americans focus on the midterm elections, the world isn’t waiting for election day. asserted
world → focus → day
A decision about buying Russian oil—apparently a desperate attempt to bring down the price of diesel—affects Ukraine’s ability to wage war. asserted
decision → buy → war
A Houthi missile launched toward Riyadh complicates Saudi Arabia’s military calculations. asserted
missile → launch → calculations
The misconduct of an American ambassador or the bizarre pronouncements of a cabinet secretary undermines our credibility with our citizens as well as our allies and adversaries. asserted
misconduct → undermine → citizens
Too often, in news outlets and apparently even in the White House, these singular events are treated as discrete problems to be solved, crises to be managed, or stories to be spun. asserted
events → treat → problems
The sheer complexity of the world, compounded by a lack of leadership, is preventing us from connecting the dots. asserted
complexity → compound → dots
It might be good to look at the overlap of these issues. uncertain
It → look → issues
Russia, Ukraine, and an American lifeline Let’s begin with one of the more perplexing developments: President Trump’s announcement that the United States would purchase Russian diesel fuel. asserted
States → begin → fuel
For months, Ukraine has conducted an increasingly effective deep-strike campaign against Russian refineries and energy infrastructure. asserted
Ukraine → conduct → refineries
Russia’s energy industry helps fund Putin’s war, and its refineries supply fuel needed for military operations. asserted
refineries → fund → operations
Ukrainian strikes have imposed economic and logistical costs on Moscow, forcing Russia to divert resources to protecting facilities far from the front lines while also affecting Putin’s efforts in pursuing his war aims. asserted
strikes → impose → aims
Yet Washington is now planning to provide Moscow with additional revenue as the invasion approaches its fifth winter. asserted
invasion → plan → winter
American lawmakers understand the need to starve Russia’s military capabilities, as they have sought to increase economic pressure on Putin through additional sanctions legislation passed last month—yet President Trump is ignoring the very law that he signed. asserted
he → understand → that
The new arrangement raises questions about how, or if, those sanctions will be applied now, and whether the administration’s decision to flout the law will undermine Ukraine’s struggle to survive. asserted
decision → raise → struggle
It’s understandable, in a somewhat self-interested way, why a president would want to lower domestic energy prices before an election (though the president’s diesel deal, even if it goes through, is unlikely to have much effect on prices because the total volume being traded is about one day’s worth of American diesel consumption). asserted
it → ’ → consumption
But denying an aggressor the resources it needs to keep fighting is also important. asserted
it → deny → resources
Why would the United States provide Russia with an economic lifeline while simultaneously expecting Ukraine to follow American instructions about where, when, and how to fight its war of self-defense? asserted
Ukraine → provide → defense
The Houthis bring the war to Riyadh asserted
Houthis → bring → Riyadh
If the president were to look to the true source of his troubles with energy prices, he would look not in Eastern Europe but in the Middle East, where Saudi Arabia is increasingly under attack. asserted
Arabia → look → attack
Using missiles and drones, the Houthis struck the major transportation and energy hubs, causing civilian casualties and demonstrating that even after more than a decade of fighting, they retain the ability to attack targets deep inside Saudi territory with devastating effects. asserted
they → use → effects
Saudi Arabia has spent enormous sums purchasing advanced American military equipment, including sophisticated air-defense systems. asserted
Arabia → spend → systems
Yet defending a large country against combinations of ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones is extraordinarily difficult. asserted
defending → defend → missiles
The Houthis understand this asymmetry. asserted
Houthis → understand → asymmetry
Like Iran, they recognize they don’t need to defeat a technologically superior military in conventional battle. asserted
they → recognize → battle
They need only continue inflicting damage, disrupting commercial aviation, threatening energy facilities, and imposing costs on a wealthier adversary. asserted
They → continue → adversary
The problem extends beyond Riyadh. asserted
problem → extend → Riyadh
The Houthis are threatening shipping through the Bab al-Mandab Strait, one of the world’s most important maritime chokepoints. asserted
Houthis → threaten → chokepoints
With trade through the Strait of Hormuz already obstructed by the war with Iran, disruption at both ends of the Arabian Peninsula threatens international commerce and energy markets. asserted
disruption → obstruct → commerce
Washington has wavered on whether and how to support Saudi Arabia, risking either the destabilization of the House of Saud and further chaos in the region, or involving America in yet another Middle Eastern war with vague objectives, little to no public support, few allies, and a stretched military. asserted
Washington → waver → objectives
That brings us to another report from Washington: renewed American attacks against Iran, potentially before the midterm elections. asserted
That → bring → elections
Reports that the administration is still considering strikes against Iran (which the president contests, but there are reasons not to take his word at face value) again raise familiar questions: What is the desired political objective? What military effects are necessary to achieve it? asserted
effects → consider → it
How will Iran respond? What additional forces will be required to protect American personnel and regional allies? asserted
forces → respond → personnel
And what happens if another round of strikes fails to produce the intended result while consuming still more critical and slow-to-replace precision munitions? asserted
round → happen → munitions
One more time for those in the back: The United States has extraordinary capabilities to strike targets almost anywhere, but destroying a target and achieving a strategic objective are not the same thing. asserted
destroying → strike → objective
Iran has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to retaliate through missiles, drones, regional partners, cyber operations, and attacks against maritime commerce. asserted
Iran → demonstrate → commerce
Military commanders are taught to examine the second- and third-order effects of their decisions before executing any action. asserted
commanders → teach → action
Political leaders should be expected to do the same, especially when the consequences could include more American casualties, an expanding regional conflict, continued damage to the global economy, and a weakened American position in other parts of the world against more formidable threats. uncertain
consequences → expect → threats
Another area of increased tension, Europe, offers a reminder that national security involves more than directly confronting an adversary. asserted
security → increase → adversary
…and 41 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support