Will Putin’s Decade-Long War on US Elections Hit the Midterms?

Mother Jones · collected 2026-09-11 · by David Corn
Read the original at Mother Jones ↗

Summary

Former US Rep. Tulsi Gabbard claimed in 2025 that then-President Barack Obama had conspired with Russia to undermine Donald Trump's presidency, prompting a Justice Department investigation into ex-Obama aides. However, this claim was thoroughly debunked by Robert Mueller and the Senate intelligence committee, which concluded that Vladimir Putin ordered attacks on Hillary Clinton's campaign and helped Trump's in 2016. The article alleges that Russian interference has occurred in every major US election since 2016, including a collusive effort with Rudy Giuliani to smear Joe Biden in 2020. Giuliani worked with pro-Russian Ukrainian legislator Andriy Derkach, who claimed to have documents showing Biden received $900,000 from Burisma, but no such evidence emerged.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-11, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
69
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
6%
4 of 69 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher trust
95.4
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-11 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

In 2025, Tulsi Gabbard, then-director of national intelligence, made false claims in a White House briefing that Barack Obama had orchestrated a "treasonous conspiracy" against Donald Trump. She misrepresented declassified documents to challenge a previous assessment that Russia had interfered with the 2016 election to help Trump and harm Hillary Clinton. Gabbard asked the Justice Department to investigate former Obama aides, which they did quickly. The claims were easily debunked by evidence from special counsel Robert Mueller and a Senate intelligence committee report led by Marco Rubio, which concluded that Vladimir Putin had ordered Russia's interference in the election to harm Clinton, help Trump, and undermine US democracy.

Written for “Russian Interference in US Elections” on 2026-09-12, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it +0.85, but every quote it verified points left, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 7852: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-09-11

Story

📰 Russian Interference in US Elections
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 32 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A mentions a hypothetical future investigation blitz, while Article B reports on a past incident in July 2025 involving Tulsi Gabbard and her misrepresentation of declassified documents”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses a recent airport drone attack attributed to Russia, while Article B refers to a past election interference incident from 2016”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 3 of 29 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles mention different events, with one referring to a midterm convention in 2026 and the other discussing a past incident involving Tulsi Gabbard's claims about Barack Obama and Donald Trump in 2017.”

Publisher

Mother Jones · 80 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

David Corn
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In May 2020, Derkach again boosted Giuliani’s get-Biden operation by releasing audio of calls between Biden and a former Ukrainian president, claiming they showed “international corruption and state treason.”
🔮 Yet no one could accuse Gloria, the pioneering feminist who died this week at the age of 92, of eschewing fun…and sex.
2026-09-09 · assertive framing · Gloria Steinem, a Dangerous Woman
🔮 They will argue that a mysterious former FBI informant with connections to Russian intelligence—who was convicted of lying to the bureau to spread the false accusation that Joe Biden and his son Hunter each received a $5 million bribe from Ukraine—should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea and get a new trial.
Also by David Corn
Gloria Steinem, a Dangerous Woman
2026-09-09 · Mother Jones
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Burisma Moscow Russia Russian Ukrainian

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 13× Biden PERSON · 5× Derkach PERSON · 5× Burisma ORG · 4× Giuliani PERSON · 4× Russia GPE · 4× Russian NORP · 4× Ukraine GPE · 3× Ukrainian NORP · 3× Gabbard PERSON · 2×

Narrative

Russia’s interference had been exhaustively documented by special counsel Robert Mueller—and by the Senate’s intelligence committee, then chaired by Republican Marco Rubio, which concluded that Vladimir Putin “ordered” attacks to “harm the Clinton campaign…help the Trump campaign…and undermine” US democracy.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-11
🔮 In May 2020, Derkach again boosted Giuliani’s get-Biden operation by releasing audio of calls between Biden and a former Ukrainian president, claiming they showed “international corruption and state treason.”
2026-09-11 · Mother Jones
Will Putin’s Decade-Long War on US Elections Hit the Midterms? · assertive framing

Claims (69 extracted, 4 hedged)

In July 2025, Tulsi Gabbard, then–director of national intelligence, strode into the White House briefing room to press the case that Barack Obama had mounted a “treasonous conspiracy.” asserted
Obama → stride → conspiracy
Days earlier, she had brazenly misrepresented declassified documents to challenge a damning 2017 intelligence assessment: Russia covertly assaulted the 2016 election—by hacking Democratic emails and pushing online disinformation—to sow discord, hinder Hillary Clinton, and assist Donald Trump. asserted
Russia → misrepresent → Trump
Now, Gabbard falsely claimed that Obama had cooked up the Moscow-aided-Trump finding as a “coup” to “undermine” Trump. asserted
Obama → claim → Trump
She asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into ex–Obama aides; it quickly did. asserted
it → ask → aides
Trump and his allies embraced her lies, even though they were easy to debunk. asserted
they → embrace → lies
Russia’s interference had been exhaustively documented by special counsel Robert Mueller—and by the Senate’s intelligence committee, then chaired by Republican Marco Rubio, which concluded that Vladimir Putin “ordered” attacks to “harm the Clinton campaign…help the Trump campaign…and undermine” US democracy. asserted
Putin → document → democracy
Gabbard was providing Trump yet another chance to falsely claim the Deep State had conspired to delegitimize him. uncertain
State → provide → him
But Russian interference was very real—and it didn’t just happen in 2016. asserted
it → happen → 2016
It’s occurred in every major election since, and Trump has abetted Putin’s decadelong assault, not only by denying this “gray warfare” is taking place, but also by neutering the federal government’s ability to thwart it. asserted
warfare → occur → it
During the 2020 contest, the Kremlin colluded—yes, colluded—with Rudy Giuliani to smear Joe Biden. asserted
Kremlin → collude → Biden
Trump’s personal attorney assembled a team of operatives who zeroed in on Hunter Biden’s board seat at Ukrainian energy company Burisma. asserted
who → assemble → Burisma
To portray Biden as corrupt, they falsely claimed that as vice president, he had forced the firing of a prosecutor because he had investigated Burisma. asserted
he → portray → Burisma
This charge was readily disproved, but as the MAGA ecosystem kept hawking it, Giuliani hooked up with Andriy Derkach, a pro-Russia Ukrainian legislator who claimed to have documents showing Biden got $900,000 from Burisma. asserted
Biden → disprove → Burisma
(No such evidence ever emerged.) asserted
evidence → emerge → ?
Derkach had not yet been officially fingered as a covert agent, but it was known he had attended the KGB’s spy academy and had pushed the Moscow-generated conspiracy theory that Ukraine, not Russia, interfered in 2016. asserted
Ukraine → finger → 2016
(Giuliani claimed he had “no reason to believe [Derkach] is a Russian agent.”) asserted
Derkach → claim → reason
Nonetheless, in December 2019, Giuliani, joined by a One America News crew, interviewed him for hours at a luxury hotel outside Kyiv. asserted
Giuliani → join → Kyiv
OAN claimed the legislator “confirmed Burisma’s money laundering, Hunter and Joe Biden’s direct involvement, and [Ukraine’s 2016] interference.” asserted
legislator → claim → laundering
In May 2020, Derkach again boosted Giuliani’s get-Biden operation by releasing audio of calls between Biden and a former Ukrainian president, claiming they showed “international corruption and state treason.” uncertain
they → boost → corruption
While the fragments revealed no wrongdoing, for MAGA they were ammo. asserted
they → reveal → MAGA
Fox News reported there were “new questions” about the Bidens. asserted
News → report → Bidens
OAN aired “Biden’s Bribe Tapes,” a three-part series, and Trump retweeted a post pushing the clips. asserted
Trump → air → clips
Three weeks after that tweet, Trump’s Treasury Department sanctioned Derkach, declaring he had been “an active Russian agent for over a decade” who was running a “covert influence campaign…cultivating false and unsubstantiated narratives” to “discredit U.S. officials” ahead of the 2020 election. asserted
who → sanction → election
To sum up: According to the Trump administration itself, the president’s personal lawyer had collaborated with a Russian agent mounting a covert action to help Trump win. uncertain
Trump → sum → action
The Derkach plot failed to keep Biden from booting Trump out of the presidency. asserted
plot → fail → presidency
But for Trump’s 2024 comeback, the Kremlin again launched a massive disinformation campaign, this time through covert networks researchers assigned names such as Storm-1516 and Doppelganger. asserted
researchers → launch → Storm-1516
With Russia now waging a barbaric war against Ukraine, these groups initially concentrated on discrediting its president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, as corrupt and criticizing Biden’s support of him. asserted
groups → wag → him
On sites designed to look like the Washington Post, Fox News, and other media outlets, Doppelganger also disseminated false stories about the election to US voters: Fraud was widely expected, bribed judges would impede Trump, Biden was close to “losing his mind. asserted
Biden → design → mind
In one instance, Russian operators created a video that supposedly disclosed a secret anti-Trump CIA–Ukrainian operation. asserted
that → create → operation
Citing this video, DNI Avril Haines testified that Russia remained “the most active foreign threat to our elections.” asserted
Russia → cite → elections
In July 2024, the Justice Department announced it had seized US domains and taken down 968 X accounts that were part of a Russian AI bot farm. asserted
that → announce → farm
Intelligence officials told reporters that Moscow was engaged in a “whole-of-government approach to influence the election.” asserted
Moscow → tell → election
A DNI fact sheet noted Russia was working to “target specific voter demographics, promote divisive narratives, and denigrate specific politicians” and aimed to “covertly use social media to amplify narratives to sway…swing states.” asserted
Russia → note → states
Biden officials did not explicitly state Putin was interfering to assist Trump—they didn’t want to be accused of influencing the election themselves—but that was clearly Moscow’s intent. asserted
that → state → election
And hard evidence soon emerged. asserted
evidence → emerge → ?
Two months later, the Justice Department revealed it had seized 32 domains used by Doppelganger to “covertly spread Russian government propaganda” smearing Ukraine and “influencing voters.” asserted
it → reveal → voters
An internal memo from the operation disclosed by prosecutors said it “makes sense for Russia to put a maximum effort” into backing Republicans and Trump voters. asserted
Russia → disclose → Republicans
In another case, employees of Kremlin propaganda outlet RT were charged with funneling millions via a US media company to prominent right-wingers such as Benny Johnson, who produced videos and podcasts bolstering pro-Trump themes. asserted
who → charge → themes
These MAGA influencers insisted that they knew nothing about Russian funding. asserted
they → insist → funding
But Margarita Simonyan, RT’s editor-in-chief, later boasted that the project had “created a large network” with “electorally significant influence.” asserted
project → boast → influence
…and 29 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support