DOJ ‘apologizes’ for running Trump’s taxpayer ads hundreds of times despite court order yanking them from airwaves

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Woodward, A. (2026, October 13). DOJ ‘apologizes’ for running Trump’s taxpayer ads hundreds of times despite court order yanking them from airwaves. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/doj-trump-taxpayer-ad-common-cause-lawsuit-b3065996.html

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-10-13 · by Alex Woodward

Quick Summary

A federal judge ordered Donald Trump’s administration to stop running taxpayer-funded ads promoting the president. Despite this order, the ads continued to air in nearly 400 spots on Sunday night and Monday, according to data from AdImpact and government watchdog Common Cause. The Department of Justice later apologized for the non-compliance with a court deadline, stating that officials became aware of the restraining order more than an hour after it was issued at 6:46 p.m. Sunday.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-13, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On October 12, 2026, a U.S. District Judge in New York ordered the Trump administration to halt all taxpayer-funded TV ads promoting President Donald Trump and his agenda immediately after plaintiffs, including Common Cause, argued these ads illegally used public funds for political purposes. Despite this order, the ads continued to run hundreds of times on national television until October 13, prompting a rare apology from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to Judge Jennifer Rochon and the watchdog groups involved.

The DOJ's lawyer apologized in court filings, explaining that delays due to the federal holiday caused some employees not to see the emergency order promptly, leading to the continued airing of approximately 400 spots. The initial legal challenge was filed on October 12 by Common Cause, Alabama state house candidate Robert Hunter, and others who argued that these ads were an illegal misuse of funds allocated for other purposes.

The $20 million TV ad campaign had been funded through the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and involved ads such as "Final Battle," which ran in nearly 400 spots after Judge Rochon's order to cease them. These ads featured moments from Trump’s second term, declaring “America will never be a communist country.” Despite the court's ruling, these ads continued to air until further action was taken by the DOJ and DHS to enforce compliance with the judge’s orders. The plaintiffs expressed satisfaction that the court acted swiftly to prevent misuse of taxpayer funds for political propaganda.

Written for “Trump Taxpayer Ads Controversy” on 2026-10-14, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Taxpayer Ads Controversy
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 29% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Daily Mail · 0.86 cosine similarity
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 19 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles report on the Justice Department apologizing for continuing to air taxpayer-funded pro-Trump ads despite a court order banning them.”
Euronews
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 2 of 14 📰 publisher trust 60
“Both articles describe a federal judge ordering Donald Trump's administration to cease running taxpayer-funded ads, with Article B detailing that the order was ignored despite being issued in Article A.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 17% hedged 2 of 12 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles discuss the US judge's order to halt taxpayer-funded ads featuring Trump, with Article B detailing the violation of that court order.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 1 of 14 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles refer to a federal judge's order to stop airing pro-Trump TV ads funded by taxpayers, with Article B indicating that the ads continued to run despite the court order.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 17% hedged 2 of 12 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe a US judge's order halting taxpayer-funded ads featuring Trump, and the second article specifically mentions that despite this court order, the ads continued to run.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 34 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles refer to a federal judge's order mandating that Donald Trump cancel his taxpayer-funded TV ads, with Article B describing the DOJ's failure to comply with this order.”
The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 20 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles describe a federal judge's order halting taxpayer-funded pro-Trump TV ads and subsequent violation of that order.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 8% hedged 1 of 12 📰 publisher trust 60
“While both articles discuss a court order regarding Trump's administration using taxpayer money for political ads, Article B specifically mentions that the ads continued to run despite the court order, which is not detailed in Article A.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 20 📰 publisher trust 59
“While both articles discuss a court order to halt Trump's taxpayer-funded ads, Article B indicates that the ads continued to run despite the original ruling, suggesting a follow-up development rather than describing the same specific incident.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 25 📰 publisher trust 59
“Article A reports on a judge ordering the cancellation of taxpayer-funded ads, while Article B discusses the DOJ's failure to comply with that order despite continuing to run the ads.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
31
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
29%
9 of 31 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-13 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 2315 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alex Woodward
41 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “In any event, admission in a foreign jurisdiction would not authorize Ms. Zacharia to practice law in California or to hold herself out as entitled to do so here,” the complaint states.
🔮 Without her intervention, the “the ground, landscape and vistas will be irrevocably altered” because “destroyed trees cannot be replaced,” preservationists warned in a lawsuit against the administration.
🔮 The ad also says “America will never be a communist country” and the UFC’s Dana White calls Trump the “toughest, most resilient person” he has ever met.
🔮 He told Minnesotans that the federal government was prepared to “come to your rescue” and pushed Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey to “immediately ask for Federal help — and leave the rest to us!”
🔮 Donald Trump’s administration has announced that the execution of Nidal Malik Hasan by firing squad will be livestreamed, an unprecedented broadcast for a state-sanctioned killing by one of the world’s most powerful democracies.
🔮 Donald Trump’s administration has announced that the execution of Nidal Malik Hasan by firing squad will be livestreamed.
🔮 The outlets are seeking a preliminary injunction that would prevent the White House from threatening access while the legal challenge plays out.
🔮 “I do not have any idea who else they work for but will, on reflection, ask them and, if there’s a conflict, I will terminate them, immediately!” the president wrote Wednesday.
🔮 Donald Trump’s approval of the execution of Nidal Hasan will mark the military’s first execution by firing squad since Slovik’s killing in 1945, part of a renewed push by the president to restart federal executions — and turn to methods such as firing squads as well as nitrogen gas and electrocution to carry out sentences quicker.
🔮 President Donald Trump will not reimburse the federal government for money already spent on a series of campaign-like ads using taxpayer dollars.
Also by Alex Woodward
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 41 articles by Alex Woodward →

Topics

AdImpact Department of Justice Independent The Justice Department the Department of Homeland Security

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 4× AdImpact ORG · 3× Dana White PERSON · 2× The Justice Department ORG · 2× the Department of Homeland Security ORG · 2× CBS ORG · 1× Department of Justice ORG · 1× Donald Trump’s PERSON · 1× Independent NORP · 1× Venezuelan NORP · 1×

Narrative

“We are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda,” plaintiffs said in a statement on Sunday night. “There is no legal justification — and no precedent — for the president to use the machinery of the government and funds set aside by Congress for other uses to influence electoral outcomes that further his own agenda,” they added.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-13
🔮 The ad also says “America will never be a communist country” and the UFC’s Dana White calls Trump the “toughest, most resilient person” he has ever met.

Claims (31 extracted, 9 hedged)

A federal judge blocked Donald Trump’s administration from running taxpayer-funded campaign-style television ads promoting the president and his agenda — but the spots continued to run anyway, blowing past a court deadline to pull them off the air. asserted
spots → block → air
The order blocks the administration from “using, disbursing or transferring” taxpayer funds appropriated by the Department of Homeland Security to “develop, create, disseminate, place, distribute, publish or air” the commercials for at least two weeks while the legal battle continues. asserted
battle → block → weeks
That order was issued at 6:46 p.m Sunday. asserted
order → issue → p.m
But ads continued to run in nearly 400 spots that night and in the day that followed, according to AdImpact data reviewed by the plaintiffs. uncertain
that → continue → plaintiffs
Department of Justice officials sent a notice that “apologizes” to the court. asserted
that → send → court
According to AdImpact data, Trump’s “Final Battle” ad — virtually identical to a 2024 campaign ad promising to “demolish the deep state” and “drive out the globalists” — ran in 193 spots during CBS 60 Minutes broadcasts on Sunday night. uncertain
ad → accord → night
The administration’s “Maduro” ad — which features footage of ousted Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro in handcuffs — aired in 198 spots during ABC’s America’s Funniest Home Videos. asserted
which → feature → Videos
On Monday, “Final Battle” aired in 11 spots that night, and “The Country He Loves” — which features Ultimate Fighting Championship president Dana White — aired in at least one spot, according to government watchdog group Common Cause, which is suing to stop the ads. uncertain
which → air → ads
The Justice Department said a copy of Sunday’s order wasn’t sent to the officials until 7:58 p.m. Sunday — more than one hour after the judge’s decision. asserted
copy → say → decision
“Agency counsel did not become aware of Government counsel’s email until this morning,” government attorneys at the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York wrote Monday. asserted
attorneys → become → York
Homeland Security officials have sent a copy of the court’s restraining order to ad vendors LMD Agency, Inc. to begin pulling the spots, according to the Justice Department. uncertain
officials → send → Department
Officials “understand that they are enjoined from using, disbursing, or transferring funds appropriated to the Department of Homeland Security to develop, create, disseminate, place, distribute, publish, or air the challenged advertisements,” government attorneys wrote. asserted
attorneys → understand → advertisements
Officials also “understand that they shall cancel or cause to be cancelled any slot, placement, reservation, or arrangement for the airing or dissemination of the challenged advertisements” an “not enter into, renew, or expand any agreement authorizing the development, creation, dissemination, placement, or airing of the challenged advertisements. asserted
they → understand → advertisements
But the government has already spent millions of dollars developing and placing the ads, all of which end with the phrase “Paid for by the U.S. Government.” asserted
all → spend → Government
“The Country He Loves” — which first aired September 23 — claims Trump implemented the “largest tax cuts in history” and is “reigniting American manufacturing” and “defend[ing] law and order and police.” uncertain
Trump → love → law
The ad also says “America will never be a communist country” and the UFC’s Dana White calls Trump the “toughest, most resilient person” he has ever met. asserted
he → say → Trump
As of October 8, the ad aired roughly 1,315 times, generating an estimated 95 million impressions, at an estimated cost of more than $1.37 million, according to AdImpact data reviewed by the plaintiffs. uncertain
ad → air → plaintiffs
Another ad, “Celebrating the Enduring Spirit,” aired approximately 3,190 times at an estimated cost exceeding $2.84 million. asserted
ad → celebrate → million
“Final Battle” aired nearly 10,000 times, at a cost of more than $9 million. asserted
Battle → air → million
“To the Great Proud People of Iran” — in which Trump calls on Iranians to “take over” their government — aired roughly 782 times at a cost of $595,000. asserted
Trump → call → 595,000
“Maduro” — which features Secretary of State Marco Rubio warning “don’t play games when this president’s in office because it’s not gonna turn out well” before showing a clip of Maduro in handcuffs — aired more than 1,200 times at a cost of $1.47 million. asserted
it → feature → million
Altogether, Trump’s ads aired more than 16,000 times at a cost of $15.4 million in advertising expenditures through October 8, according to plaintiffs. uncertain
ads → air → plaintiffs
The Justice Department has not disputed these figures. asserted
Department → dispute → figures
The campaign also reportedly includes eight other ads that have not yet aired, thanks to the injunction. uncertain
that → include → injunction
“We are pleased the court acted swiftly to prevent more taxpayer dollars from being used for such blatantly unlawful political propaganda,” plaintiffs said in a statement on Sunday night. “There is no legal justification — and no precedent — for the president to use the machinery of the government and funds set aside by Congress for other uses to influence electoral outcomes that further his own agenda,” they added. asserted
they → act → agenda
Trump has said he will pay for the ads himself, but the White House told The Independent that the president “was not referring to reimbursement. asserted
president → say → reimbursement
It’s unclear how Trump will spend the money himself, and he is legally barred from directing or controlling the spending decisions of a super PAC connected to him. uncertain
he → ’ → him
Former White House ethics lawyer and Democracy Defenders Action co-founder Norm Eisen previously told The Independent that the ads are “clearly” political propaganda. asserted
ads → tell → Independent
“This is yet another corrupt attempt to advance a partisan agenda ahead of the midterm election, paid for by average American taxpayers who are already suffering from high costs caused by this administration’s failed policies,” he said. asserted
he → advance → policies
Senator Maggie Hassan, a top Democrat on the Joint Economic Committee, told The Independent that “these campaign ads never should have run on the taxpayer’s dime to begin with.” asserted
ads → tell → dime
“They were clearly wrong and clearly illegal, which is why the president should also immediately repay the taxpayers for the amount already spent on these ads,” she said. asserted
she → repay → ads
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support