The ABA Council has repealed Standard 206, a diversity and inclusion standard adopted in response to George Floyd's death in 2020, during an emergency meeting on June 15-16. The repeal vote was 10-6 with one abstention, with the stated rationale being that it is necessary to preserve recognition from state supreme courts and the Department of Education. Law school deans had pushed for the standard's adoption without evidence of its effectiveness or necessity. The author of this piece questions whether the repeal will have any real impact on law schools' practices.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-09,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
The American Bar Association's Council has repealed ABA Standard 206, a rule requiring law schools to have a "commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion" as part of their accreditation process. The standard was adopted in 2016, six years after its passage, during an emergency meeting with a vote of 10-6. The sole reason given for the repeal by Council chair Melissa Hart was that it was necessary to preserve recognition from state supreme courts and the Department of Education. This move comes after law school deans were criticized for rushing the standard's adoption without evidence of its effectiveness in improving race relations. Despite the repeal, law schools are still likely to voluntarily comply with the standard, as it has become a widely accepted practice. The decision may not have a significant impact on law schools' commitment to diversity and inclusion.
Written for “ABA's Diversity Standards Repeal” on 2026-09-09,
grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted
verbatim and was checked against the article text before being
stored, so you can find it in the original.
-
Law school deans rushed it through the process in the wake of George Floyd's death.
right criticizes hasty adoption
-
There was no evidence this standard was necessary or would actually improve race relations.
right questions effectiveness
-
The Council chair said nothing about the emptiness of Standard 206.
right criticizes lack of justification for repeal
-
Instead the sole reason offered was survival:
right characterizes ABA's reasoning as self-serving
-
I doubt it. Law schools will still voluntarily comply with the ABA's former Standard through various DEI initiatives.
right predicts continued compliance despite repeal
Leaning score +0.85 for article 7359 (high confidence, 5 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-09
Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent
ABA Standard 206 should have never been adopted.
asserted
Standard → adopt → ?
Law school deans rushed it through the process in the wake of George Floyd's death.
asserted
deans → rush → death
There was no evidence this standard was necessary or would actually improve race relations.
asserted
standard → be → relations
Now, barely six years later, the ABA Council has repealed the standard during an emergency meeting.
asserted
Council → repeal → meeting
What was the rationale for repealing the standard?
asserted
rationale → repeal → standard
The Council chair said nothing about the emptiness of Standard 206.
asserted
chair → say → Standard
Instead the sole reason offered was survival:
asserted
reason → offer → ?
"The council believes that national accreditation of law schools is in the best interests of law students, the legal profession and the public, and we can best serve in this role with continued recognition by state supreme courts and the Department of Education," said Melissa Hart, the council's chair, in a statement.
asserted
Hart → believe → statement
"Repealing Standard 206 was necessary to preserve recognition by a growing number of state courts, as well as the department.
asserted
Repealing → repeal → courts
Will this action matter?
asserted
action → matter → ?
I doubt it.
asserted
I → doubt → it
Law schools will still voluntarily comply with the ABA's former Standard through various DEI initiatives.
asserted
schools → comply → initiatives
And I doubt the Education Department will care much that this rule was repealed at the barrel of a gun.
asserted
rule → doubt → gun
Nothing stops the ABA from reimposing the same of substantially similar rule in three years.
asserted
Nothing → stop → years
If only the ABA had listened while there was still a chance.
asserted
ABA → listen → ?