Exclusive: Investigation finds evidence of possible chemical weapons use in Sudan

Euronews · collected 2026-09-09 · by Eleonora Vasques
Read the original at Euronews ↗

Summary

A former OPCW officials-led investigation has found evidence suggesting possible chemical weapons use by the Sudanese government during its civil war. The 32-page report identifies indicators such as acute respiratory distress and environmental degradation among witnesses who claim to have been exposed to toxic chemicals linked to military activity between 2024 and 2025. The investigation cites testimony from eight Sudanese witnesses, corroborated by video and pictures, which suggests the use of chemical weapons in September 2024 may have involved chlorine. This is not the first time allegations of chemical weapons use have been made against Sudan, with previous investigations published by the New York Times and Washington Post also pointing to possible wrongdoing.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-09, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
26%
7 of 27 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
95.1
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
World
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-09 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

A group of investigators, led by former officials from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), have found evidence suggesting that the Sudanese government may have used chemical weapons in its ongoing civil war. The investigation, which covers the period between 2024 and 2025, identified various indicators of toxic chemical exposure, including acute respiratory distress, unusual odors, colored explosive blasts, long-term health problems, and environmental degradation. These findings are based on witness accounts and corroborated by evidence gathered from a 32-page report seen by Euronews. The use of chemical weapons in civilian areas is banned under international law, and the OPCW officials leading the investigation warned that such actions could have serious consequences for those responsible.

Written for “Chemical Weapons Used in Sudan” on 2026-09-09, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.45 Confidence medium
Leaning score -0.45 for article 7168 (medium confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-09

Story

📰 Chemical Weapons Used in Sudan
World · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 26% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses the healthcare system crisis in Sudan due to lack of aid funding and violence, while Article B reports on an investigation into possible chemical weapons use by the government in Sudan between 2024-2025, with no clear connection to the event mentioned in Article A”
Semafor · 0.87 cosine similarity
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 96
“Although both articles discuss allegations of chemical weapons use in Sudan, they seem to be referring to different events (2024 vs. 2024-2025) and provide distinct details”

Publisher

Euronews · 152 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Eleonora Vasques
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Former Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons officials say they have found evidence that the Sudanese government may have deployed chemicals amid the country's ongoing civil war.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Euronews OPCW Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons Sudan Sudanese

Subjects

Euronews ORG · 5× Sudanese NORP · 5× Sudan GPE · 4× OPCW ORG · 3× Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons ORG · 1× State Party ORG · 1× States Parties ORG · 1× the New York Times ORG · 1× the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons ORG · 1× the Washington Post ORG · 1×

Narrative

"Both witnesses described a military aircraft flying overhead immediately before the incident," the report says, listing "barrel-shaped objects associated with the overflight; impacts that did not resemble conventional explosive attacks; unusual airborne emissions; unfamiliar odours; acute respiratory symptoms affecting approximately twenty workers; treatment provided at the refinery medical clinic; subsequent change to vegetation close to the impact area".
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-09
🔮 Former Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons officials say they have found evidence that the Sudanese government may have deployed chemicals amid the country's ongoing civil war.

Claims (27 extracted, 7 hedged)

Former Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons officials say they have found evidence that the Sudanese government may have deployed chemicals amid the country's ongoing civil war. uncertain
government → say → war
Acute respiratory distress, unusual odours, coloured explosive blasts, long term health problems, and environmental degradation are among the indicators that a group of experts has identified as credible evidence to support witness accounts of exposure to toxic chemicals linked to military activity in Sudan between 2024 and 2025. asserted
group → identify → 2024
The findings are described in a 32-page investigation, seen by Euronews, into the use of chemical weapons in civil areas in Sudan amid the ongoing war that started in 2023. asserted
that → describe → 2023
The investigation was led by former senior officials of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), two of whom served with the organisation when it was awarded the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize for its work to implement the global ban on chemical weapons. asserted
it → lead → weapons
The two former senior OPCW officials leading the team talked to Euronews, but requested that their names remain anonymous due to the sensitive nature of the content. “Given that at least one State Party has sanctioned individuals in relation to the alleged use of chemical weapons, that there are new and increasing allegations of a hidden programme, and that there is strong witness testimony indicating that there was an incident in September 2024 that may have involved chlorine, the OPCW and it’s States Parties need to launch an investigation,” the two former senior officials told Euronews. uncertain
officials → lead → Euronews
The report cites the testimony of eight Sudanese witnesses, corroborated by video, pictures, and other digital material produced by the alleged victims, which indicates that chemical weapons might have been used in the conflict. uncertain
weapons → cite → conflict
Euronews reviewed the pictures contained in the report, but could not talk to the witnesses nor inspect their video footage or other digital evidence. uncertain
Euronews → review → footage
This is not the first time that evidence has been produced indicating the possible use of chemical weapons in Sudan. asserted
evidence → produce → Sudan
Both the New York Times and the Washington Post published investigations in early September drawing on evidence provided by Middle Eastern intelligence, including pictures of stockpiles and correspondence among Sudanese officials. asserted
Times → publish → officials
It was the alleged use of chemical weapons that led the US government to impose sanctions on Sudan in April 2025. asserted
that → allege → April
But the investigation reviewed by Euronews adds both a human dimension and substantive grounds to the serious allegations, and is set to draw further attention. asserted
investigation → review → attention
The Sudanese government has denied any wrongdoing on multiple occasions. asserted
government → deny → occasions
According to the report, the team of experts interviewed eight witnesses in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi. uncertain
team → accord → capital
Together, they identified "a number of credible incidents involving unexplained illness following military activity" asserted
they → identify → activity
The group was composed of "individuals reporting direct exposure to alleged incidents, persons involved in emergency response activities, a healthcare professional who treated affected patients and individuals able to provide supporting documentary and digital material relevant to the investigation," the report reads. asserted
report → compose → investigation
The strongest evidence were provided by two witnesses interviewed separately who were both present during an incident at the Al-Jili Oil Refinery near Khartoum in September 2024. asserted
who → provide → September
At the time, the area was under the control of the Rapid Support Forces, the leading group fighting against the Sudanese army that has been sanctioned by the EU and the US for serious human rights violations. asserted
that → lead → violations
"Both witnesses described a military aircraft flying overhead immediately before the incident," the report says, listing "barrel-shaped objects associated with the overflight; impacts that did not resemble conventional explosive attacks; unusual airborne emissions; unfamiliar odours; acute respiratory symptoms affecting approximately twenty workers; treatment provided at the refinery medical clinic; subsequent change to vegetation close to the impact area". asserted
that → describe → area
It specified that the acute respiratory and ocular effects described by the two witnesses are consistent with exposure to an airborne irritant or hazardous chemical. asserted
effects → specify → irritant
However, the team of experts was not able to identify the substance. asserted
team → identify → substance
The other testimonies report other incidents in different places with recurring patterns. asserted
testimonies → report → patterns
"Several witnesses described aerial attacks followed by the rapid onset of respiratory symptoms affecting those in the immediate vicinity," the report reads, explaining that the common described symptoms included "coughing, difficulty breathing, eye irritation and, in some cases, gastrointestinal or dermatological effects". asserted
symptoms → describe → cases
Similar to the witnesses at the oil refinery they also described "unusual odours, coloured airborne emissions and the apparent absence of the explosive effects normally associated with conventional aerial bombardment". asserted
they → describe → bombardment
The team of experts could not conclusively confirm that the incidents were caused by the use of chemical weapons due to gaps that need to be filled in the findings. However, they found credible and consistent evidence suggesting this may be the case, and have called on the OPCW to consider this evidence and pursue further investigation stemming from their preliminary findings. uncertain
this → confirm → findings
According to UN data from April 2026, some 14 million people have been displaced since the Sudanese war began in 2023. uncertain
war → accord → 2023
The conflict has also triggered what is widely described as one of the world’s worst hunger crises, with nearly 19.5 million people facing acute food insecurity and famine conditions. asserted
people → trigger → insecurity
Euronews approached the Sudanese government for comment, but received no reply before publication. asserted
Euronews → approach → publication
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support