Sarah Longwell on How Democrats Can Defeat Trump

Read the original at Persuasion ↗
Cite

Mounk, Y. (2026, September 8). Sarah Longwell on How Democrats Can Defeat Trump. Persuasion. https://www.persuasion.community/p/sarah-longwell

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Persuasion · collected 2026-09-08 · by Yascha Mounk commentary

Quick Summary

Sarah Longwell, publisher of The Bulwark and author, discusses how Democrats can defeat Donald Trump with Yascha Mounk in this conversation. According to Longwell, Trump's dominance stems from his unique relationship with the American public, spanning decades through various media platforms and business ventures. Longwell argues that running a celebrity like Brad Pitt or Trump would not be effective, as they need to have a genuine public persona. In her view, part of the Democratic Party's problem is that voters didn't know Kamala Harris well enough, highlighting the importance of having a strong public image.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-08, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Sarah Longwell, publisher of The Bulwark and author of "How to Eat an Elephant: One Voter at a Time", discussed how the Democratic Party can defeat Donald Trump in a recent conversation with Yascha Mounk. Longwell argued that Trump is a unique figure in politics, who has been omnipresent in American culture for decades due to his relationships with media personalities and public figures. She suggested that Trump's success is not solely due to his policy positions, but rather his ability to connect with voters on a personal level. Longwell also discussed the Democratic Party's struggles to appeal to working-class voters, which she believes is key to defeating Trump. The conversation covered various topics, including Kamala Harris's failed presidential campaign and how the Democratic Party can win back support from these voters.

Written for “Trump Election Strategy for Democrats” on 2026-10-23, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Election Strategy for Democrats
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 10% hedged 5 of 52 📰 publisher trust 69
“The articles mention different topics and events, one is a podcast conversation discussing strategies to defeat Donald Trump, while the other is about student organizers trying to register voters at a university”
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 5% hedged 2 of 40 📰 publisher trust 61
“The two articles discuss different topics: one about President Trump's role in the Republican Party and midterms, and the other about how Democrats can defeat Donald Trump”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Centre further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 8
“The articles discuss different topics, authors, and transcripts, suggesting they cover separate conversations or discussions rather than a single event”
The Bulwark
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 2 of 14
“Two articles discuss a book by Sarah Longwell and its themes, but one is a podcast conversation with Yascha Mounk and the other is a conversation with Andrew Weissmann”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
321
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
18 of 321 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-08 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Persuasion · 83 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Yascha Mounk
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I begin the book by saying you undoubtedly live in a state that may be at war, or whose borders have certainly been shaped by war.
🔮 Might they even win the Senate?
2026-10-03 · assertive framing · Galen Druke on the Midterms
🔮 Then this guy put up his hand and said, Professor Furedi, are you saying that democracy is good in and of itself, and you would even respect democracy if it went against your views?
2026-09-29 · assertive framing · Frank Furedi on the Case for Populism
🔮 Once they did that, you were entering into a game in which there was a struggle for supremacy and over who would create their version of the state.
🔮 A series of elections held today are unlikely to receive the same attention but may be even more revelatory about Germany’s dire state.
2026-09-21 · assertive framing · The Last Nail in the Coffin for Friedrich Merz
🔮 In fact, you’ve argued at times that we may already have reached something like artificial general intelligence.
2026-09-19 · assertive framing · Jerry Kaplan on Why AI Won’t Kill Us All
🔮 In this week’s conversation, Yascha Mounk and Jacob Weisberg discuss why American institutions proved far less resistant to Trump in his second term than his first, what figures like Jeff Bezos and Brad Karp reveal about the social nature of courage and cowardice, and whether Harvard’s response to the Trump administration could become a turning point for institutional resistance.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Jacob Weisberg on the Contagion of Cowardice
🔮 There’s a kind of melancholy, I think, that people feel for the good old days, for a world that was maybe slower, where the worth that they had relative to their environment was a little bit clearer than in the world today.
2026-09-12 · assertive framing · Judith Dada on the Rise of the AfD
🔮 If I had to give you a thesis, it would be that Donald Trump is a unique figure in our politics, that there aren’t a lot of other people like him, because of his relationship to America for decades and decades, not just as a television game show host, but as somebody who lived on Page Six, somebody who wrote The Art of the Deal, someone who’s been on all of these luminaries and talk shows.
2026-09-08 · assertive framing · Sarah Longwell on How Democrats Can Defeat Trump
🔮 In your book you suggest that it depends on a set of circumstances, such as how set the institutional environment is in which they operate and what the likely replacement would be like.
2026-09-05 · assertive framing · Jared Diamond on Whether Leaders Make History
Also by Yascha Mounk
The Three-Party Problem
2026-10-05 · The Dispatch
Galen Druke on the Midterms
2026-10-03 · Persuasion
Frank Furedi on the Case for Populism
2026-09-29 · Persuasion
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Yascha Mounk →

Topics

American Democrats The Bulwark The Focus Group the Democratic Party

Subjects

Kamala Harris PERSON · 10× Donald Trump PERSON · 7× Brad Pitt PERSON · 4× Democrats NORP · 3× Sarah Longwell PERSON · 3× American NORP · 2× Mounk PERSON · 2× Yascha Mounk PERSON · 2× the Democratic Party ORG · 2× The Bulwark ORG · 1×

Narrative

Those two things aren’t totally independent from each other, obviously, but when I look at this in an international perspective, I do think there’s been just a long secular trend in virtually every democracy I can think of, especially for native white working class voters, but but also increasingly, as in the United States, multiracial working class voters, shifting more towards the right while the educated voters are shifting towards the left.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-08
🔮 If I had to give you a thesis, it would be that Donald Trump is a unique figure in our politics, that there aren’t a lot of other people like him, because of his relationship to America for decades and decades, not just as a television game show host, but as somebody who lived on Page Six, somebody who wrote The Art of the Deal, someone who’s been on all of these luminaries and talk shows.
2026-09-08 · Persuasion
Sarah Longwell on How Democrats Can Defeat Trump · assertive framing

Claims (321 extracted, 18 hedged)

Sarah Longwell is publisher of The Bulwark, host of The Focus Group podcast, and author of How to Eat an Elephant: One Voter at a Time. asserted
Longwell → eat → Time
In this week’s conversation, Yascha Mounk and Sarah Longwell discuss why Donald Trump has dominated American politics for a decade, where Kamala Harris went wrong, and how the Democratic Party can win back working-class voters. asserted
Party → discuss → voters
This transcript has been condensed and lightly edited for clarity. asserted
transcript → condense → clarity
I’m really excited to talk about the book—and how on earth we can defeat Donald Trump and the broader movement he stands for. asserted
he → ’m → Trump
Do you want to give us your elevator pitch? asserted
you → want → pitch
If I had to give you a thesis, it would be that Donald Trump is a unique figure in our politics, that there aren’t a lot of other people like him, because of his relationship to America for decades and decades, not just as a television game show host, but as somebody who lived on Page Six, somebody who wrote The Art of the Deal, someone who’s been on all of these luminaries and talk shows. asserted
who → have → luminaries
Obviously, he had strong relationships with every sort of big radio personality, and so he was omnipresent for the public. asserted
he → have → public
Sometimes people say, well, we need to run a celebrity like Donald Trump. asserted
we → say → Trump
And I say, no, celebrities are different. asserted
celebrities → say → ?
People may be like, I like Brad Pitt or I like The Rock, but they’re playing characters. uncertain
they → like → characters
Donald Trump has always been who he is, and that has given him this unbelievable natural advantage in the psyche of the American public. asserted
that → give → public
When I do focus groups with voters, which I do all the time, they say, well, he’s a businessman. asserted
he → do → which
They don’t even think of him as a failed businessman, they think of him as a rich person who has been a developer, who’s run television shows, owned a football team, and so on. asserted
who → think → team
There aren’t a lot of people who can compete with that in public life and translate that into political power, which he has. asserted
he → be → which
The Republican Party then totally abdicated to Donald Trump. asserted
Party → abdicate → Trump
They stopped having ideas, they stopped having candidates that had their own sort of pitch for who they are. asserted
they → stop → pitch
Now it’s a cult of personality, which means that as he is on his way out, there is a unique opportunity in this moment to put him in the rearview mirror and not let it linger, if Democrats or the broader pro-democracy coalition are able to rally together and dominate the Republicans going into the next three or four years. asserted
Democrats → ’ → years
Let’s get a little bit more specific about some of the ways in which Democrats have failed to do that. asserted
Democrats → let → that
You have an interesting story of moderating an event with Kamala Harris and Liz Cheney, and you argue that part of the problem is that voters didn’t really know Kamala Harris. asserted
voters → have → Harris
It speaks to what you’re saying about Brad Pitt being popular, but running Brad Pitt is not going to work because people don’t know Brad Pitt in the way they knew Donald Trump. asserted
they → speak → Trump
Why is it that voters didn’t know who Kamala Harris was? asserted
Harris → know → ?
And was that a personal failing of Kamala Harris as a political candidate, or is that a broader symptom of how Democrats are failing to respond to this political, technological, ideological moment? asserted
Democrats → fail → moment
Longwell: I don’t want to pick on Kamala Harris too much, but I do want to say that Kamala Harris absolutely should not run for president again. asserted
Harris → want → president
I’m clear about that in the book. asserted
I → ’m → book
That’s not because I don’t like Kamala Harris. asserted
I → ’ → Harris
I actually think Kamala Harris very much outperformed expectations when she ran. asserted
she → think → expectations
I think she was done dirty by Joe Biden and his team, who never did anything to elevate her and then wouldn’t let her put any daylight between Biden and herself. asserted
her → think → Biden
This is just nitpicking but what do you mean, they didn’t let her? asserted
they → mean → her
I know they tried to bully her, but just fucking pick something you disagree with and say it… asserted
you → know → it
Well, you’re making a great point. asserted
you → make → point
But that’s the failure. asserted
that → ’ → ?
Part of the failing is that Kamala Harris didn’t know who she was in a strong enough way to go out and do that. asserted
she → know → that
So when Joe Biden’s team says to her, no daylight, kid—what they were saying is, if you start crapping on us, we’re gonna crap on you back. asserted
we → say → you
That kind of garbage makes me insane because it speaks to the broader disconnect between Joe Biden and Democrats who’ve been telling voters that Donald Trump is an existential threat to democracy, but then don’t act like it. asserted
Trump → make → it
They let all their petty grievances get in the way of it. asserted
grievances → let → it
But to your point, after Kamala Harris lost, I went back and listened to all the focus groups again with this hindsight. asserted
I → lose → hindsight
And the thing that was so clear in there, and I saw it when I was listening in real time, but I don’t know that I heard it as loudly as it was being expressed by the voters, was, I don’t know who she is. asserted
she → see → voters
I don’t know what she stands for. asserted
she → know → what
I don’t trust her. asserted
I → trust → her
I don’t know anything about her. asserted
I → know → her
…and 281 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support