A new dark age?

Dawn - Home · collected 2026-09-07 · by Maleeha Lodhi
Read the original at Dawn - Home ↗

Summary

British journalist James Marriott's book "The New Dark Ages" argues that the decline of reading and rise of screen culture are damaging society by eroding critical thinking skills. According to Marriott, people are spending too much time on their smartphones, which is creating a hostile environment for learning and leading to the spread of misinformation. He claims that this has resulted in a "fragmented, trivialised and angry new world" where conspiracy theories and mad ideas can spread quickly, contributing to societal disorder and unreason. Marriott attributes the intellectual hollowing of society and the decline of public discourse to the decline of reading and the dominance of addictive screens.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-07, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
60
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
5%
3 of 60 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
95.4
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Science
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-07 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

James Marriott, a British journalist, has written a book called The New Dark Ages: The End of Reading and the Dawn of a Post-Literate Society, which argues that people are no longer reading as much and that a screen culture is replacing print culture. According to Marriott, this shift has had negative consequences for society, including the erosion of critical thinking skills. He claims that in a print culture, knowledge is organized, understood, and contextualized, allowing readers to develop their reasoning power through the process of reading. Marriott argues that people are losing out on these benefits because they are spending too much time interacting with screens and not enough time engaging with written text.

Written for “Dark Ages of Science” on 2026-09-07, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.65 Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning score +0.65 for article 6606 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-07

Story

📰 Dark Ages of Science
Science · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
404 Media
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 6% hedged 3 of 47 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A reports on a specific article by NYU Professor Ruby Thelot, while Article B discusses a book and its author James Marriott, with no connection to the original article or Professor Thelot.”
www.thestar.com - RSS Results of type article
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 24 📰 publisher trust 62
“Article A discusses a specific decision by school boards in Canada, while Article B refers to a general debate about the impact of technology on society.”
World & Nation
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 52 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article B discusses a book and its perspective on the impact of social media, while Article A reports on Meta's settlement and new safeguards for kids”
The Markup
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 26% hedged 15 of 58 📰 publisher trust 94
“The articles discuss related topics, but do not describe a shared specific happening; one is an excerpt from investigative reporting on social media addiction and the other is a book review about the impact of technology on society”

Publisher

Dawn - Home · 137 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.093 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Maleeha Lodhi
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Marriot may be overstating his case and exaggerating the damaging impact of digital technology.
2026-09-07 · assertive framing · A new dark age?
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

British Marriott

Subjects

Marriott ORG · 4× Carr PERSON · 2× Marriot PERSON · 2× British NORP · 1× James Marriott’s PERSON · 1× Nicholas Carr PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Last year in a compelling book Superbloom: How Technologies of Connection Tear Us Apart, Nicholas Carr surveyed how digital technology — including smartphones, the internet, social media and artificial intelligence — is transforming both people and societies.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-07
🔮 Marriot may be overstating his case and exaggerating the damaging impact of digital technology.
2026-09-07 · Dawn - Home
A new dark age? · assertive framing

Claims (60 extracted, 3 hedged)

RECENT years have seen a surge of books and articles on the impact of technology on people’s lives and thinking. asserted
years → see → lives
While communication technology has opened new vistas and opportunities it has also created its own problems in our digital age. asserted
it → open → age
Some works celebrate its benefits. asserted
works → celebrate → benefits
Others warn of its damaging consequences especially those of social media. asserted
Others → warn → media
James Marriott’s The New Dark Ages: The End of Reading and the Dawn of a Post-Literate Society joins this debate from another angle. asserted
Ages → join → angle
The British journalist’s work falls within the genre that emphasises the harmful consequences of digital technology. asserted
that → fall → technology
The book’s principal concern is that people aren’t reading anymore and that a screen culture is displacing a print culture. asserted
culture → read → culture
For Marriott, the spread of literacy and the kind of thinking nurtured by the world of print drove progress in economic development, scientific advancement, and the emergence of modern democracy. asserted
spread → nurture → democracy
In a print culture, he argues, knowledge is organised, understood, and contextualised. asserted
knowledge → argue → culture
“Books make arguments, propose theses and develop ideas.” asserted
Books → make → ideas
This process, he contends, develops the power of reasoning. asserted
he → contend → reasoning
For Marriott, this is getting lost in an era where the smartphone has taken over our lives and become the main reason for the decline of reading. asserted
smartphone → lose → reading
There has never been a technology quite like the smartphone, which has so much distracting content that it keeps people’s attention endlessly on the screen. asserted
it → have → screen
He maintains that a hostile environment for learning has been created by this digital distraction. asserted
environment → maintain → distraction
Screens are changing human behaviour. asserted
Screens → change → behaviour
Smartphones are shaping a “fragmented, trivialised and angry new world”, in which conspiracy theories and mad ideas are spread at terrifying speed. asserted
theories → shape → speed
The spread of knowledge is impeded by this and is actually breaking down. asserted
spread → impede → this
Political discourse once grounded in logical argument now takes place “amid the moronic inferno of social media”. asserted
discourse → ground → media
Marriot attributes much of the 21st century’s disorder and unreason to the fading of the written word and the “colonisation of culture” by addictive screens. asserted
Marriot → attribute → screens
He sees the intellectual hollowing of society as a consequence of the decline of reading and the world becoming a less rational place. asserted
world → see → reading
Public discourse today, he claims, has become trivial to the point of dysfunction. uncertain
he → claim → dysfunction
It has affected politics too as this environment encourages the rise of mediocre politicians with little understanding of history, whose appeals to the public are emotional and do not rest on rational propositions. asserted
appeals → affect → propositions
Politics, Marriott argues, is growing “angrier, stupider and more obsessed with personality”. asserted
Marriott → argue → personality
He laments the fact that the full ramifications of the onset of what he calls a post-literate society are not fully understood. asserted
he → lament → what
Marriot may be overstating his case and exaggerating the damaging impact of digital technology. uncertain
Marriot → overstate → technology
Last year in a compelling book Superbloom: How Technologies of Connection Tear Us Apart, Nicholas Carr surveyed how digital technology — including smartphones, the internet, social media and artificial intelligence — is transforming both people and societies. asserted
technology → tear → people
He argued that instead of broadening minds, expanding empathy and fostering harmony, this technology has had the opposite effect. asserted
technology → argue → effect
It is eroding understanding and trust and contributing to strife and social disharmony. asserted
It → erode → strife
Communication technology offers immense opportunities but has serious unintended consequences. asserted
technology → offer → consequences
For Carr, speed and intensity in the flow of information and stimuli compel people to rely on intuitive thinking based on biases. asserted
speed → compel → biases
It deprives them of the ability to tap into deeper analysis. asserted
It → deprive → analysis
As a result, it has undermined reasoned analysis, methodical evaluation and contemplative inquiry. asserted
it → undermine → analysis
As he puts it “Attention splinters, understanding grows thin”. asserted
understanding → put → it
This results in mental shortcuts and shallow thinking. asserted
This → result → shortcuts
Thus “rather than levelling barriers to knowledge, it becomes a barrier itself”. asserted
it → level → knowledge
For both Marriott and Carr, the information spread through digital vehicles does not foster knowledge but detracts from it. asserted
information → spread → it
“More informed does not mean better informed.” asserted
informed → mean → ?
The fragmented nature of information provided by the screen makes much of it useless, according to Marriott. uncertain
much → provide → Marriott
Social media further dumbs down the public conversation. asserted
media → dumb → conversation
Marriott sees social media and short-form videos producing junk content and misleading posts. asserted
media → see → content
…and 20 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support