Greenland became the centre of an unusual dispute over one of the world's longest-lived vertebrates after the municipal council of Avannaata approved a proposal to cull 1,000 Greenland sharks.
asserted
council → become → sharks
Under the scheme, fishermen would have received 300 Danish kroner, about $45, for each shark heart they brought in.
asserted
they → receive → heart
The proposal was intended to address complaints that Greenland sharks damage fishing gear and take fish from fishing lines, with some fishermen reporting substantial losses from damaged equipment.
asserted
fishermen → intend → equipment
But the plan raised concerns because Greenland sharks can live for centuries, grow extremely slowly and may not reach sexual maturity until around 150 years of age.
uncertain
sharks → raise → age
The proposed bounty was subsequently abandoned after Greenland's government questioned whether the municipality had the legal authority to introduce it.
asserted
municipality → propose → it
Why Greenland fishers want the sharks removed
Greenland sharks are regularly encountered by fishermen targeting species including Greenland halibut and cod.
asserted
sharks → want → halibut
They can become caught in longlines, gillnets and trawling equipment, while also taking fish caught on hooks.
asserted
They → catch → hooks
For fishermen operating in remote Arctic waters, damaged or lost equipment can be expensive to replace.
asserted
equipment → operate → waters
Ilulissat-area fisherman Henrik Jensen told The Guardian that he had lost about 6,000 hooks and that his losses could reach around 30,000 Danish kroner, roughly $4,500, in a single day.
uncertain
losses → tell → day
Other fishermen have also described the cost of replacing lines.
asserted
fishermen → describe → lines
Timotheus Petersen, chairman of the fishing association in Kullorsuaq, said a longline can cost about 1,599 Danish kroner and that losing one can force fishermen to stop fishing until they obtain replacement equipment.
asserted
they → say → equipment
For some fishing communities, encounters with the animals can translate into lost gear, lost fishing time and lower catches.
asserted
encounters → translate → gear
Avannaata approved a 1,000-shark bounty
The proposal was approved earlier in 2026 by the municipal council of Avannaata Kommunia, which covers much of north-west Greenland and includes Ilulissat.
asserted
which → approve → Ilulissat
The scheme offered fishermen 300 Danish kroner for each Greenland shark heart, with a target of 1,000 sharks.
asserted
scheme → offer → sharks
The proposed 300,000-kroner programme was to be financed through the municipality's pest-control budget.
asserted
programme → finance → budget
Avannaata Mayor Lars Erik Gabrielsen said the intention was to protect fishermen's incomes and catches.
asserted
intention → say → incomes
The municipality also pointed to historical bounty schemes in Greenland as precedent for attempts to reduce local shark numbers.
asserted
municipality → point → numbers
However, the proposed scheme did not proceed.
asserted
scheme → propose → ?
The government questioned the legality of the plan
The bounty was abandoned after Greenland's government questioned whether Avannaata had the legal authority to introduce the scheme.
asserted
Avannaata → question → scheme
Oceans North Kalaallit Nunaat reported in April 2026 that Avannaata would not introduce the bounty because the scheme had no legal basis.
asserted
scheme → report → basis
The conservation organisation had criticised the proposal, arguing that a cull could harm the species and undermine Greenland's efforts to present its fisheries as sustainable.
uncertain
cull → criticise → fisheries
The distinction is important as the municipality approved the proposal, but the planned cull was subsequently dropped before the 1,000-shark target could be carried out.
uncertain
target → approve → proposal
The broader debate over Greenland sharks and fishing remains unresolved, and a future cull has not been ruled out.
asserted
cull → remain → sharks
Greenland sharks can live for more than 400 years
The animal at the centre of the dispute is the Greenland shark, Somniosus microcephalus.
asserted
animal → live → dispute
A landmark 2016 study published in Science used radiocarbon dating of eye-lens tissue from 28 Greenland sharks to estimate their ages.
asserted
study → publish → ages
The researchers estimated that the largest shark in the study was 392 years old, with an uncertainty of 120 years, and concluded that Greenland sharks are the longest-lived vertebrates known to science.
asserted
sharks → estimate → science
The research also estimated that the sharks reach sexual maturity at approximately 156 years, with an uncertainty of 22 years.
asserted
sharks → estimate → years
For general descriptions of the species, scientific and government sources therefore commonly describe Greenland sharks as capable of living for around or more than 400 years.
asserted
sources → describe → years
Their extremely slow life cycle makes them vulnerable
The sharks' extraordinary lifespan is accompanied by an exceptionally slow life history.
asserted
lifespan → make → history
The 2025 Canadian government assessment of the species says Greenland sharks have remarkably slow growth and late maturity, with a generation time likely to be between 150 and 200 years.
asserted
sharks → say → time
It describes these characteristics as making the species particularly vulnerable to overfishing.
asserted
species → describe → overfishing
The species is globally classified as Vulnerable.
asserted
species → classify → ?
Its population size and trends are still poorly understood, but scientists consider human activities, particularly fishing-related mortality, to be significant threats.
asserted
activities → understand → ?
That biology is what makes the proposed removal of 1,000 sharks particularly controversial.
asserted
removal → make → sharks
A species that takes well over a century to reach reproductive age cannot replace lost adults quickly.
asserted
that → take → adults
The sharks are already caught as bycatch
Greenland sharks are affected by fishing even when they are not deliberately targeted.
asserted
they → catch → fishing
The Canadian government assessment says the species is caught incidentally in trawl, longline and gillnet fisheries throughout its range.
asserted
species → say → range
Available estimates suggest that at least 3,500 Greenland sharks are caught as bycatch globally each year, although the true figure is probably higher because monitoring and reporting remain incomplete.
asserted
monitoring → suggest → bycatch
Greenland sharks were hunted for centuries for their liver oil, particularly in Greenland, Iceland, Norway and Russia.
asserted
sharks → hunt → Greenland
The Canadian assessment notes that the animals remain the target of some small-scale fisheries in Greenland and Iceland.
asserted
animals → note → Greenland
…and 18 more, not listed.