Why is New Jersey taking the legal battle over prediction markets to the Supreme Court?
asserted
Jersey → take → Court
The request follows lower court rulings on oversight of the prediction firms.
asserted
request → follow → firms
New Jersey has asked the Supreme Court to weigh in on a nationwide legal battle pitting dozens of states against online prediction markets.
asserted
Jersey → ask → markets
The request this week arrived days after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Aug. 28 against platforms like Kalshi, rejecting their requests to prevent state-level oversight from a Nevada regulatory agency.
asserted
Court → arrive → agency
In that case, the court found Kalshi "did not show a likelihood" that federal regulation supersedes state officials in the oversight of sports-related events contracts on prediction markets.
asserted
regulation → find → markets
The finding challenged the firm's assertion that such contracts qualify as financial instruments policed by the federal government.
asserted
contracts → challenge → government
The ruling in Nevada contrasts with a decision issued in April by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which sided with Kalshi in its lawsuit against New Jersey, finding that federal regulators retain exclusive oversight of prediction markets, including sports-related contracts.
asserted
regulators → contrast → contracts
Officials in states with both Republican- and Democrat-controlled governments have moved to regulate or ban prediction markets in recent months, invoking their statutory authority to police sports gambling, which they claim prediction markets facilitate.
uncertain
markets → control → gambling
In response, the prediction platforms have argued that their sports-related contracts are not gambling, but rather a type of derivative called a swap, and as such is solely regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), a federal agency.
asserted
contracts → argue → Commission
In her request for a Supreme Court hearing, New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport said the divide between the 9th and 3rd Circuit courts holds "tremendous importance."
asserted
divide → say → importance
"It will determine whether a multi-billion-dollar gaming industry can suddenly operate free from state sports-gaming laws," Davenport added, further noting that New Jersey has regulated sports wagers for more than 100 years.
asserted
Jersey → determine → years
In a statement to ABC News, Kalshi criticized New Jersey's request for a hearing at the Supreme Court.
asserted
Kalshi → criticize → Court
“We disagree with New Jersey's filing.
asserted
We → disagree → filing
It cannot be regulated by 50 different regulators.
asserted
It → regulate → regulators
Both the Third Circuit and the District of New Jersey sided with Kalshi because the CFTC's exclusive jurisdiction preempts state law," Kalshi spokesperson Dani Lever said.
"While New Jersey points to a recent decision in the Ninth Circuit, that decision agreed with that key principle.
asserted
decision → side → principle
Where it differed, it did so based on a regulation that's in the process of being rewritten.
asserted
that → differ → process
We remain confident in the lower courts' rulings, and nothing in New Jersey's filing today changes our view," Lever added.
asserted
Lever → remain → view
The filing marks the latest legal action taken by state officials to enable them to regulate online prediction markets like Kalshi.
asserted
filing → mark → Kalshi
A federal court in July temporarily blocked a Minnesota ban on prediction markets, siding with defendants who said they were subject to federal and not state oversight.
asserted
they → block → oversight
A few days later, New York also sued Kalshi, alleging its prediction market is illegal, unlicensed gambling, in large part because the state says outcomes depend more on chance than skill.
asserted
outcomes → sue → skill
Last week, Connecticut also sued Kalshi to block alleged unlicensed sports gambling.
asserted
Connecticut → sue → gambling
At the time, Kalshi directed ABC News to a post on X by Jovy Dedaj, the head of litigation for Kalshi, which called for federal oversight of prediction markets.
asserted
which → direct → markets
Dedaj also criticized the Connecticut lawsuit for singling out Kalshi while allegedly allowing other prediction markets to operate in the state.
uncertain
markets → criticize → state
On its website, Kalshi states that it is "regulated as a Designated Contract Market (DCM), which is a financial exchange designated to trade futures, swaps, and or options on commodities" and as such is subject to federal oversight."
asserted
which → state → oversight
In April, a federal judge blocked Arizona from continuing a criminal case against Kalshi.
asserted
judge → block → Kalshi
The state filed charges claiming the company operated an illegal, unlicensed gambling business and accepted unlawful wagers from Arizona residents.
asserted
company → file → residents
At the time, a spokesperson for Kalshi denied the allegations, describing them as "meritless."
asserted
spokesperson → deny → them
