A federal judge has temporarily restrained the U.S. Department of Education from releasing a list of foreign donors who have given up to $5.2 billion to Ivy League universities since 2020. The decision was made based on concerns that disclosing this confidential information could harm the safety and privacy of donors, particularly those living in politically repressive countries. Judge Tanya Chutkan’s ruling also cites potential violations of the Administrative Procedure Act. The Association of American Universities, representing over 69 top U.S. research institutions, initiated legal action to prevent the release, arguing it would violate assurances given to protect donor privacy and could discourage future contributions.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-02,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
A federal judge blocked the Education Department on Thursday from releasing a list of foreign donors to Harvard, Columbia and other top US universities — ruling that the disclosure of the confidential information could “constitute irreparable harm.”
uncertain
disclosure → block → harm
DC US District Judge Tanya Chutkan slapped the temporary restraining order on the Trump administration as it was seeking to publish a list of all foreign donors who have given up to $5.2 billion to the universities since 2020.
asserted
who → slap → 2020
So-called non-natural person entities accounted for the vast majority of the $5.2 billion, officials noted, rather than individual donors.
asserted
officials → call → donors
“This would be a foreign government; this could be a foreign military; this could be a foreign business, could be any of those things,” an Education Department official said of the list, or “an enterprise connected to a university, that’s connected to Chinese intelligence or the PLA [People’s Liberation Army].
uncertain
that → say → intelligence
“Here, Defendants threaten to imminently publish the names of donors who have hitherto remained anonymous for every internet user to see in posterity,” wrote Chutkan in the five-page order.
asserted
Chutkan → threaten → order
“Once published, the information will likely never escape the public eye.
asserted
information → publish → eye
Indeed, the disclosure may produce downstream harms to the safety of donors who live in politically repressive countries,” added Chutkan, an appointee of former President Barack Obama.
uncertain
Chutkan → produce → Obama
Revealing the names of the foreign donors, the judge ruled, would likely violate the Administrative Procedure Act as a result.
asserted
judge → reveal → result
The order will remain in place for the next 28 days, while Chutkan mulls a more temporary injunction against publishing the names.
asserted
Chutkan → remain → names
The Association of American Universities, which brought the suit against the Department of Education earlier Thursday, argued that donors contributed based on “assurances” that their privacy would be guarded.
asserted
privacy → bring → assurances
The association represents at least 69 top research universities in the US, including the University of Pennsylvania, Yale University and others.
asserted
association → represent → Pennsylvania
An Education Department spokeswoman claimed that the ruling would halt the administration from revealing schools that have been “cashing multi-million-dollar checks from malign foreign actors that fund centers and faculty who promote anti-Western ideologies and support partnerships that are designed to export sensitive technology to geopolitical adversaries.”
asserted
that → claim → adversaries
“Now, the ‘premier’ association for American research universities is suing because it is hellbent on avoiding public accountability after decades of insatiable greed and disregard for the national interest,” added spokeswoman Ellen Keast.
asserted
Keast → sue → interest
“Americans deserve transparency about the billions flowing from overseas to U.S. campuses, and we will fight AAU in court to deliver it.”
asserted
we → deserve → it
The AAU hailed the ruling in a statement, saying if the Trump administration succeeded it “would chill the lawful generosity that supports scholarships, research, and teaching on campuses across the country.”
asserted
that → hail → country
In April 2025, Education Department officials launched a probe of the University of California-Berkeley over funding it received from China.
asserted
it → launch → China
President Trump the same month signed an executive action to strengthen enforcement of Section 117 of the Higher Education Act.
asserted
Trump → sign → Act
The law forces US universities to report contracts with or gifts from foreign sources that exceed to $250,000 to the Education Department — but the AAU objected, claiming that the department had been obtaining the identities of individual donors since 2020 during the first Trump administration.
asserted
department → force → administration
“It’s a pretext to prevent public transparency about the enterprises that are funneling billions of dollars to lead US universities mainly to do two things,” the official said.
asserted
official → ’ → things
“The first is to steal intellectual property … and the second thing, … these gifts are also coming from Arab countries … to change what’s taught on US campuses.”
asserted
what → steal → campuses
“And so they’re funding the anti-Zionist, anti-Western ideology that is really not only dividing campuses but dividing the country,” the official added.
asserted
official → fund → country