Barabak: Integrity on the ballot: Election deniers target secretary of state races in key states

World & Nation · collected 2026-09-06 · by Mark Z. Barabak
Read the original at World & Nation ↗

Summary

Opinion piece analyzing the role of Secretary of State offices in maintaining election integrity. Election deniers backed by former President Trump are running in key states such as Arizona, Nevada, and Wisconsin, which could lead to potential problems in the 2028 presidential election. The article notes that Trump's attempts to undermine democracy have raised the importance of these offices, which oversee elections. A federal judge has temporarily blocked Trump's executive order limiting mail voting, but it may eventually reach the Supreme Court.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-06, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
51
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
18%
9 of 51 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
95.0
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-06 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Election deniers are running for secretary of state in key states, including Arizona, Nevada, and Wisconsin, where they could potentially make it difficult to certify election results in 2028. This is a concern because the secretary of state's office plays a crucial role in overseeing elections. In these states, election deniers have been winning Republican primaries, suggesting that some voters see their skepticism about the integrity of elections as a legitimate way to address lingering doubts from past cycles, including 2020 and 2022. The secretary of state's office is seen as critical in maintaining the trustworthiness of elections, especially after President Trump's attempts to undermine democracy have elevated its importance.

Written for “Election Denier Threats” on 2026-09-07, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.75 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.75 for article 5242 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-06

Story

📰 Election Denier Threats
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further right than this 🔴 13% hedged 3 of 23 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A describes a specific case of election fraud charges, while Article B discusses the impact of election deniers in secretary of state races in Wisconsin and other states”
TIME
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 15% hedged 5 of 34 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses a general threat to democracy, while Article B focuses on the specific issue of election deniers targeting secretary of state races in key states”
Home - CBSNews.com
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A mentions secretary of state races in Arizona, Nevada, and Wisconsin, while Article B is focused on Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson”
Home - CBSNews.com
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 17 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses a general trend of election deniers targeting secretary of state races in key states, while Article B focuses on Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson's statement about ensuring voters 'know the truth' about elections”
World & Nation
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 7% hedged 5 of 73 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles cover unrelated topics, one discussing secretary of state races in key states and the other about California's backtracking on good-government policies”
Latest & Breaking News on Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 2 of 16 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a specific individual being charged with election-related crimes, while Article B discusses a general trend of 'election deniers' running for secretary of state in key states, but doesn't mention the individual or the charges”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly left 🔴 13% hedged 3 of 23 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article B discusses a broader trend and context, while Article A reports on a specific incident of the Trump administration sending subpoenas to Nevada's election office”
World & Nation
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 17% hedged 7 of 41 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A discusses secretary of state races in Arizona, Nevada, and Wisconsin, while Article B reports on primary results in Florida, Wyoming, and Alaska”

Publisher

World & Nation · 83 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.099 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Mark Z. Barabak
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 - Election deniers on the ballot in Arizona, Nevada and Wisconsin could make mischief in 2028.
🔮 Today we discuss political forecasting, death and taxes.
🔮 This race will test Democratic strength in November - Click here to listen to this article - - The contest in Nevada’s 2nd Congressional District should be a shoo-in for Republicans.
Also by Mark Z. Barabak
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Arizona Georgia Nevada Wisconsin state

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 6× Arizona GPE · 3× Nevada GPE · 3× Wisconsin ORG · 3× Georgia GPE · 2× Reagan PERSON · 2× state ORG · 2× American NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× John Lewis ORG · 1×

Narrative

- Some conservative commentators and officials backing new election integrity initiatives contend that creating bipartisan task forces, reviewing list maintenance and scrutinizing county compliance are reasonable responses to public concern, framing these measures as strengthening—not threatening—confidence in elections.[1][4] - Supporters of election-denying candidates, as reflected in analyses of battleground races, often maintain that mainstream institutions and media have minimized irregularities, and they argue that installing officials who share their skepticism will ensure that close contests undergo more thorough investigation before certification.[3][5][6][7][11] - A number of political analysts note that these candidates continue to win Republican primaries in states such as Arizona and Wisconsin, suggesting that a sizable bloc of voters sees denialist or hard-line “integrity” platforms as a legitimate way to address lingering doubts about the 2020 and 2022 cycles.[3][5][6][11]
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-06
🔮 - Election deniers on the ballot in Arizona, Nevada and Wisconsin could make mischief in 2028.

Claims (51 extracted, 9 hedged)

Election deniers target secretary of state races in key states asserted
deniers → target → states
- Click here to listen to this article - - Trump’s attempts to undermine our democracy have elevated the import of the secretary of state’s office. asserted
attempts → click → office
- Election deniers on the ballot in Arizona, Nevada and Wisconsin could make mischief in 2028. uncertain
deniers → make → 2028
A government intended to reflect and honor the will of the people works only if the people can express their will. asserted
people → intend → will
That’s why we have elections. asserted
we → ’ → elections
John Lewis, the late Georgia congressman and hero of the civil rights movement, said voting is precious and “the most powerful non-violent tool we have in a democratic society.” asserted
we → say → society
Former President Reagan called the right to vote “the crown jewel of American liberties.” asserted
Reagan → call → liberties
Alas, we have a president who believes his most precious right, apart from lining his silken pockets, is nursing his over-ripened ego. asserted
right → have → ego
Donald Trump can’t stand the fact he lost the 2020 election — which he most emphatically did — and so he’s built a carapace of lies: about illegal ballots, rigged election machinery, rampant voting by noncitizens, and so on. asserted
he → stand → noncitizens
Worse than his deceit — which has deeply undermined faith in our elections and the dedicated people who run them — is Trump’s brazen efforts to rig the system by disenfranchising millions of voters, all so he can keep Democrats from winning office. asserted
he → undermine → office
Reagan, no less than Lewis, probably is turning cartwheels in his grave. asserted
Reagan → turn → grave
The effort is part of the implementation of President Trump’s executive order limiting mail voting and has been temporarily halted by a federal judge. asserted
effort → limit → judge
The ruling is being appealed by the administration and the directive may ultimately end up back before the U.S. Supreme Court. uncertain
directive → appeal → Court
In November, voters in 26 states will elect a secretary of state, choosing the officials who will oversee the 2028 presidential race throughout most of the country. asserted
who → elect → country
What could possibly go wrong? uncertain
What → go → ?
Let’s hope we don’t find out. asserted
we → hope → ?
The secretary of state used to be one of those ministerial posts that few outside government knew or much cared about; from a political standpoint, the office and its occupant seemed dull and dry as Melba toast. asserted
office → use → toast
That changed after 2000, when Republican Katherine Harris placed her weighty thumb on the scale and helped deliver Florida’s 25 electoral votes, and the White House, to George W. Bush. asserted
Harris → change → Bush
What really politicized the office of secretary of state, though, was Trump’s obsessive compulsion with his 2020 defeat. asserted
politicized → politicize → defeat
Spurred by his incessant lies about supposed fraud, allies and opportunists set out to hijack the country’s election machinery and do Trump’s dirty work from the inside. asserted
allies → spur → inside
In 2022, a group calling itself the America First SOS Coalition endorsed a slate of cranks and quacks who ran for secretary of state in 14 states, including the presidential battlegrounds of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada and Wisconsin. asserted
who → call → Arizona
Thankfully, all of them lost, save for one candidate in Indiana. asserted
all → lose → Indiana
Among those defeated was Tina Peters, the former county elections chief in Mesa County, Colo., who went on to infamy, and prison, for orchestrating a security breach aimed at “proving” 2020 votes were stolen from Trump. asserted
votes → defeat → Trump
(Never mind that he won the county by nearly 30 percentage points.) asserted
he → mind → points
The SOS Coalition apparently is defunct; its website address now leads to an online gambling portal. asserted
address → lead → portal
But more than two dozen election deniers ran for secretary of state this year, according to States United Democracy Center, a nonpartisan group that works to promote fair and secure elections nationwide. uncertain
that → run → elections
Six of those candidates won their primaries and made it to November’s ballot, including in three states — Arizona, Nevada and Wisconsin — that promise to be key once more to picking the next president. asserted
that → win → president
The stakes in those races are considerable, said Peverill Squire, a University of Missouri expert on state elections. asserted
Squire → say → elections
“Who’s going to be administering [election] rules? asserted
Who → go → rules
How they’re going to interpret those rules?” he said, offering examples of the office’s import. asserted
he → go → import
“Whether they’re going to try to make it more difficult to vote, or easier to vote. asserted
it → go → ?
Whether they’re going to try to engage in activities that will further raise doubts in some people’s minds about how fairly the election has been conducted. asserted
election → go → minds
The contest in Nevada is a rerun of 2022, when Democrat Cisco Aguilar narrowly defeated Republican Jim Marchant. asserted
Aguilar → defeat → Marchant
Undeterred, Marchant continues to spout gibberish about sabotaged voting machines and other far-fetched claims of election chicanery. uncertain
Marchant → continue → chicanery
Among the remedies he’s floated, according to the Nevada Independent, is using technology to measure voters’ heartbeat as a way to verify their identity. uncertain
he → float → identity
Um... Meanwhile, in Arizona, incumbent Democrat Adrian Fontes faces Republican state Rep. Alexander Kolodin, an attorney who was sanctioned by the State Bar for pursuing baseless claims of 2020 election fraud. uncertain
who → face → fraud
One of his Trump-inspired lawsuits was swiftly rejected by a federal judge who noted its conspicuous lack of “relevant or reliable evidence” — thus raising doubts not just about Kolodin’s discernment but also his capacity to cover even the basics. asserted
who → inspire → basics
In Wisconsin, where elections are overseen by a six-member, bipartisan commission, Republican Jay Schroeder is running on a pledge to dismantle that fair-minded system, calling it a “failed experiment.” asserted
Schroeder → oversee → it
Had he been secretary of state in 2020, Schroeder told NBC News, he would not have certified Joe Biden’s victory in the state. asserted
he → tell → state
That’s all you need to know, Wisconsin. asserted
you → ’ → ?
…and 11 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support