A federal judge, Ivan Davis, has ordered the Trump administration to reveal who set up a $1.8bn "anti-weaponization fund" that was reportedly dropped by the justice department last month. The order was made as part of a lawsuit brought by the Democracy Forward non-profit on behalf of plaintiffs including a fired prosecutor and a college professor acquitted of assaulting federal agents at a protest in California. The proposed fund drew bipartisan criticism, with critics noting that it could be revived despite the administration's claims that it is "dead". The judge's order comes as the Trump administration has hinted that another avenue to compensation may still be possible.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-06,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted
verbatim and was checked against the article text before being
stored, so you can find it in the original.
Leaning score -0.35 for article 5020 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-09-06
A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to reveal who set up the structure of a controversial $1.8bn “anti-weaponization fund” to recompense victims of so-called political lawfare that was reportedly dropped by the justice department last month.
uncertain
that → order → department
Ivan Davis, the US magistrate judge for the eastern district of Virginia, issued the order compelling discovery materials from the government as part of a lawsuit brought by the Democracy Forward non-profit on behalf of plaintiffs including a fired prosecutor and a college professor acquitted of assaulting federal agents at a protest against an immigration raid in California.
asserted
Davis → issue → California
“Today’s order granting discovery is a significant step in getting to the bottom of the slush fund,” said Aman George, senior counsel at the non-profit.
asserted
George → grant → profit
“We will continue to meet the government in court until our investigation is complete and the slush fund is permanently halted.”
asserted
fund → continue → court
Last month, Todd Blanche said the fund he proposed before he was confirmed “is dead”.
asserted
he → say → ?
The US attorney general told Fox News Sunday: “The fund is dead or whatever word you want to use.
asserted
you → tell → word
It never started.
asserted
It → start → ?
So, it’s not as if the fund is coming back.”
asserted
fund → ’ → ?
Democrats maintain that the proposed fund would have been used to compensate prosecuted and since-pardoned January 6 rioters, among others.
asserted
fund → maintain → others
Blanche said that Trump “believes the justice department was weaponized against a lot of Americans” under the Biden administration, adding: “It really hurt them financially.”
The proposed compensation scheme was set up as part of the settlement Trump reached with the IRS regarding a lawsuit over the leak of his tax returns.
asserted
Trump → say → returns
The agreement shielded the president and his family from future tax audits.
asserted
agreement → shield → audits
In July, another federal judge found that the parties had never truly been in conflict and Trump’s $10bn lawsuit against the IRS had only ever been a pretense for setting up the fund.
asserted
lawsuit → find → fund
“There was never adverseness between the parties; there was never a case or controversy; and there was never a question as to who would prevail,” the US district judge Kathleen Williams said in a ruling, adding that the lawsuit had been brought “for an improper purpose – to gain the imprimatur of judicial legitimacy for a ‘settlement’ that had no viable basis in law or fact”.
asserted
that → be → law
The proposed fund drew bipartisan criticism in Washington, including opposition from two Republican senators, John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, and it put Blanche’s confirmation for attorney general at risk.
asserted
it → propose → risk
Critics of the program have noted that the document demanded by lawmakers did not include signatories to the initial agreement, suggesting that it could be revived.
uncertain
it → note → agreement
Blanche has said that “there were never commissioners” in charge of the “payout pot”.
asserted
Blanche → say → pot
But Senate Democrat Cory Booker said the agreement guaranteed “nothing … no guarantees whatsoever that this slush fund still can’t go forward”.
asserted
fund → say → nothing
Trump has rued the abandonment of the fund and has not ruled out another avenue to compensation.
asserted
Trump → rue → compensation
“It is dead, but you know, I wish it weren’t,” he said of the fund at a cabinet meeting in July.
asserted
he → know → July
“To be honest with you, I think people were horribly treated, horribly abused.”
asserted
people → think → you
