Jared Diamond on Whether Leaders Make History

Read the original at Persuasion ↗
Cite

Mounk, Y. (2026, September 5). Jared Diamond on Whether Leaders Make History. Persuasion. https://www.persuasion.community/p/jared-diamond

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Persuasion · collected 2026-09-05 · by Yascha Mounk commentary

Quick Summary

Jared Diamond, a professor of geography at UCLA, discusses his book "Profits, Prophets, Coaches and Kings" in which he explores whether leaders make a significant impact on history. The conversation with Yascha Mounk centers around how to measure the influence of individual leaders, considering factors such as institutional environments and potential replacements. Diamond suggests that natural experiments or counterfactual scenarios can help determine the role of leaders in bringing about success or failure. The question of whether leaders make a difference is a longstanding one, with differing opinions from historical figures like Thomas Carlyle and Tolstoy.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-05, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Professor Jared Diamond, a geography professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, discussed with Yascha Mounk how to measure the impact of individual leaders in his book "Profits, Prophets, Coaches and Kings: (When) Do Leaders Make a Difference?". The conversation revolved around whether leaders truly make a difference in achieving success, or if it's just luck. Diamond suggested that the institutional environment plays a significant role in determining how much of an impact a leader can have. He also mentioned that he has researched and found correlations between the development of societies and factors such as the availability of high-protein foods and domesticable animals. In other words, Diamond's work implies that leaders are not solely responsible for their country or organization's success, but rather it's the underlying circumstances that contribute to it.

Written for “Jared Diamond on Leadership” on 2026-10-22, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Jared Diamond on Leadership
Science · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
305
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
31 of 305 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Science
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-05 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Persuasion · 83 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Yascha Mounk
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I begin the book by saying you undoubtedly live in a state that may be at war, or whose borders have certainly been shaped by war.
🔮 Might they even win the Senate?
2026-10-03 · assertive framing · Galen Druke on the Midterms
🔮 Then this guy put up his hand and said, Professor Furedi, are you saying that democracy is good in and of itself, and you would even respect democracy if it went against your views?
2026-09-29 · assertive framing · Frank Furedi on the Case for Populism
🔮 Once they did that, you were entering into a game in which there was a struggle for supremacy and over who would create their version of the state.
🔮 A series of elections held today are unlikely to receive the same attention but may be even more revelatory about Germany’s dire state.
2026-09-21 · assertive framing · The Last Nail in the Coffin for Friedrich Merz
🔮 In fact, you’ve argued at times that we may already have reached something like artificial general intelligence.
2026-09-19 · assertive framing · Jerry Kaplan on Why AI Won’t Kill Us All
🔮 In this week’s conversation, Yascha Mounk and Jacob Weisberg discuss why American institutions proved far less resistant to Trump in his second term than his first, what figures like Jeff Bezos and Brad Karp reveal about the social nature of courage and cowardice, and whether Harvard’s response to the Trump administration could become a turning point for institutional resistance.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Jacob Weisberg on the Contagion of Cowardice
🔮 There’s a kind of melancholy, I think, that people feel for the good old days, for a world that was maybe slower, where the worth that they had relative to their environment was a little bit clearer than in the world today.
2026-09-12 · assertive framing · Judith Dada on the Rise of the AfD
🔮 If I had to give you a thesis, it would be that Donald Trump is a unique figure in our politics, that there aren’t a lot of other people like him, because of his relationship to America for decades and decades, not just as a television game show host, but as somebody who lived on Page Six, somebody who wrote The Art of the Deal, someone who’s been on all of these luminaries and talk shows.
2026-09-08 · assertive framing · Sarah Longwell on How Democrats Can Defeat Trump
🔮 In your book you suggest that it depends on a set of circumstances, such as how set the institutional environment is in which they operate and what the likely replacement would be like.
2026-09-05 · assertive framing · Jared Diamond on Whether Leaders Make History
Also by Yascha Mounk
The Three-Party Problem
2026-10-05 · The Dispatch
Galen Druke on the Midterms
2026-10-03 · Persuasion
Frank Furedi on the Case for Populism
2026-09-29 · Persuasion
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Yascha Mounk →

Topics

the University of California, Los Angeles the World Cup

Subjects

Hitler PERSON · 2× Jared Diamond PERSON · 2× Diamond PERSON · 1× Jared Diamond: PERSON · 1× Mounk PERSON · 1× Thomas Carlyle PERSON · 1× Tolstoy PERSON · 1× Yascha Mounk PERSON · 1× Yascha Mounk: PERSON · 1× the University of California, Los Angeles ORG · 1×

Narrative

If you do a regression of outcomes around the world, where the outcomes are development of state government, development of technology, and development of population, those outcomes can be related to the number and value of plants and animals, allowing you to say empirically that high-protein cereals have been more valuable than high-starch tuber plants, and that domestic animals that can be ridden are more valuable than domestic animals that cannot be ridden. Let me throw in one more tidbit.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-05
🔮 In your book you suggest that it depends on a set of circumstances, such as how set the institutional environment is in which they operate and what the likely replacement would be like.
2026-09-05 · Persuasion
Jared Diamond on Whether Leaders Make History · assertive framing

Claims (305 extracted, 31 hedged)

His books include Guns, Germs, and Steel, The Third Chimpanzee, and Profits, Prophets, Coaches and Kings: (When) Do Leaders Make a Difference? In this week’s conversation, Yascha Mounk and Jared Diamond discuss how to measure the true impact of individual leaders, why the institutional environment determines how much difference a leader can make, and whether societies are better served by systems that constrain leaders or empower them. asserted
that → include → them
This transcript has been condensed and lightly edited for clarity. asserted
transcript → condense → clarity
I have many questions about this book and about your work more broadly. asserted
I → have → work
Your new book is really about what difference leaders do and don’t make, and that’s a different way of asking the age-old historical and social scientific question about structure versus agency. asserted
that → make → agency
How should we think about salient leaders, ones that have led a country, a sports team, or a company to great success? asserted
that → think → success
Are they just being lucky, or did they actually make a difference in bringing about that success? asserted
they → make → success
There’s been a longstanding question whether leaders make a difference. asserted
leaders → make → difference
Thomas Carlyle said yes, he believed in the role of the great man. asserted
he → say → man
Tolstoy said no, and historians nowadays tend to be skeptical about the role of leaders. asserted
historians → say → leaders
But the question arises in so many spheres: in politics, in business, in sports like the World Cup, in religion. asserted
question → arise → religion
Do leaders make a difference, and if so, do they make a difference under some circumstances, and what are those circumstances? asserted
circumstances → make → circumstances
This is a question that interests me personally. asserted
that → interest → me
I was born in 1937, so I spent my childhood under the shadow of Hitler, and leaders have made a difference, mostly for the good, occasionally not for the good, in my own life. asserted
leaders → bear → life
I’m personally interested in the question of whether leaders make a difference. asserted
leaders → ’m → difference
So how should we think about this, presuming somebody does make a big difference and somebody does make much less of a difference? asserted
somebody → think → difference
In your book you suggest that it depends on a set of circumstances, such as how set the institutional environment is in which they operate and what the likely replacement would be like. asserted
replacement → suggest → what
The best way to think about this is to engage in what you call a kind of natural experiment. asserted
you → think → experiment
For us, we might think about it as a kind of counterfactual. uncertain
we → think → counterfactual
As a laboratory scientist, my PhD was in laboratory physiology, so I was used to doing manipulative experiments, putting the gallbladder in sodium-rich solutions and then in potassium-rich solutions. asserted
I → use → solutions
If we were an omnipotent creature from outer space, you and I could quickly decide on the role of leaders by manipulative experiments. uncertain
you → decide → experiments
We would kill some leaders and not kill others, or we would make 50 worlds, and in 25 of them Hitler died in 1930, and in the other 25 he didn’t die in 1930. But we can’t do that, and if we could, it would be immoral and illegal. uncertain
it → kill → that
So we have to do what astronomers and epidemiologists and so many other scientists do, which is to rely on natural experiments. asserted
which → have → experiments
We can’t and shouldn’t kill leaders, but leaders do die natural deaths, and we can compare what happens when a leader dies with when a leader doesn’t die. asserted
leader → kill → deaths
Or if you want to do something less drastic, instead of seeing what happens when a leader dies, you can get a leader very upset, slightly upset, or not much upset. asserted
leader → want → something
Business people often lose family members. asserted
people → lose → members
If a business person’s only son dies, the business person is very upset. asserted
person → die → ?
If his or her wife or husband dies, they get quite upset. asserted
they → die → ?
If a sibling dies, somewhat upset. asserted
sibling → die → ?
If a parent dies, slightly upset. asserted
parent → die → ?
And if a mother-in-law dies, perhaps not upset at all, but happy. asserted
mother → die → law
Then you can look at the results, and it turns out that business profits go down the most if an only child dies, and they go down much less if a parent dies. asserted
parent → look → results
They don’t go down, and may even increase, although it’s not statistically significant, if the mother-in-law dies. uncertain
mother → go → law
So those are examples of natural experiments that allow us as social scientists to do what molecular biologists would do by manipulation. asserted
biologists → allow → manipulation
That’s quite a striking statistic. asserted
That → ’ → ?
I don’t recommend that any listeners who hold stock in a company go about murdering the mother-in-law of the CEO, because as you pointed out, it wasn’t a statistically significant result, but that tells you perhaps as much about human nature as it does about business. asserted
it → recommend → business
If one of the starting questions is whether great men and women make history, when you look at all of the hero worship we have today for some of the greatest individual athletes, some of the greatest coaches, some great founders and CEOs, or of course for politicians. asserted
we → start → politicians
I think by and large people have negative views of politicians, but many do admire one politician or another and think that if only they were in office, everything would get better. asserted
everything → think → office
Or does your research suggest that they really are the decisive factor? asserted
they → suggest → ?
If I gave you an “on the whole” answer, you should stop right now and say, Jared Diamond, you’re an idiot, because one can’t generalize so easily. asserted
one → give → answer
It depends. asserted
It → depend → ?
…and 265 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support