‘You make me want to throw up’: Republicans attack ex-special counsel Jack Smith at Senate hearing

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
The Guardian · collected 2026-09-29 · by Ariana Baio

Quick Summary

During a Senate judiciary committee hearing on Tuesday, former special counsel Jack Smith faced intense criticism from Republican senators over his investigations into Donald Trump. Senator Eric Schmitt accused Smith of perjury regarding a trip to Atlanta, though Smith clarified he was actually in Maryland for a University of Iowa Hawkeyes game. The hearing also saw Senator John Kennedy accuse Smith of not believing in the Tooth Fairy and say that Smith made him want to throw up, highlighting the contentious nature of the proceedings.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-29, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On Tuesday, former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Senator Chuck Grassley to defend his two criminal investigations into President Donald Trump. Republicans accuse Smith of abusing authority and politically targeting Republicans, while Democrats support him for standing up against Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents. The hearing, titled "Oversight of Jack Smith’s Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans," also involves scrutiny over subpoenas issued by Smith's office, which were aimed at disrupting certification of Joe Biden's victory in 2020, ultimately leading to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Smith has insisted his decisions were made without political bias and said he would not be silenced despite threats from Trump's Justice Department.

Written for “Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate” on 2026-10-04, grounded in this article and the 34 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
12%
3 of 24 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
59.7
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
35
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate
Politics · 35 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 11% hedged 3 of 28 📰 publisher trust 59
“Both articles describe Jack Smith testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 29, 2026.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 1 of 23 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe Jack Smith's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 29, 2026.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 6% hedged 2 of 35 📰 publisher trust 72
“Both articles describe Jack Smith's appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee on September 29, 2026.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 9% hedged 2 of 22 📰 publisher trust 63
“Both articles describe the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the same day where Jack Smith faced attacks from Republicans.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 72
“Both articles describe Jack Smith's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the same date, with ARTICLE B providing details about the Republican attacks during the hearing.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 7% hedged 1 of 14 📰 publisher trust 65
“Both articles describe the same Senate hearing on September 29, 2026, involving former special counsel Jack Smith's defense of his actions and facing attacks from Republicans.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 1 of 16 📰 publisher trust 72
“Both articles describe the same Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the same day where Jack Smith was questioned by Republican senators, including Senator John Kennedy and Eric Schmitt.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 5
“Both articles describe Jack Smith's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on the same day, where he defended his decision to prosecute Donald Trump and faced attacks from Republicans.”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe Jack Smith testifying at a Senate hearing on the same day, with similar details including Republican attacks and perjury allegations.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10
“Both articles describe the same Senate Judiciary hearing on September 29, 2026, where Republican Senator Eric Schmitt attacked former special counsel Jack Smith over a misunderstanding about basketball games.”

Publisher

The Guardian · 948 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)
2026-10-03
Prison chief in Christa Pike case oversaw five ‘botched’ executions, lawyers say
2026-09-20
Judge orders Kennedy Center to give 30 days’ notice before major physical changes
2026-09-07
Former Louisiana mayor completes 90-day jail term for raping 16-year-old boy

Who wrote this

Ariana Baio
18 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 CBS News was the first to report that Clayton would be appointed White House AI czar.
🔮 For years, undocumented immigrants, who had been living in the US could be released back into their communities on bond, so long as they did not pose a threat to safety or were considered a flight risk.
🔮 The Trump administration may deport immigrants to a “third country”, or a country other than their homeland, without providing them an opportunity to dispute due to humanitarian concerns, the supreme court said in a brief order on Tuesday.
🔮 Schmitt, who called Smith a “dirtbag”, claimed the prosecutor went to Atlanta to attend a Hawks game on 3 February 2024, and insinuated Smith may have met with Fani Willis, the former Fulton county district attorney who brought state charges against Trump.
🔮 Andrew Bailey, a deputy director of the FBI who has been overseeing some of Trump’s election-related investigations, will step down from his position approximately one year after assuming his role.
🔮 Powerful Republicans, including Texas senator John Cornyn, said they would not support French in the upcoming election.
🔮 Gavin Newsom speaks at the Center for American Progress Ideas conference at in Washington DC on 19 May 2026.
🔮 Sherrill, a Democrat, said she would appoint the state’s acting comptroller, Shirley Emehelu, as the acting lieutenant governor.
🔮 Jackson, one of the three liberal members of the supreme court, criticized the justices’ willingness to issue rulings via the “shadow docket”, saying it undermines the public’s faith in the judicial system. “There is a serious concern that the supreme court’s modern stay practices are having a disruptive and potentially corrosive effect,” Jackson told faculty and students at the University of the District of Columbia’s David A Clarke school of law on Thursday.
🔮 “These fresh details continue to raise concerns about the judgment of the DoJ, and the extent to which the DoJ is willing and able to prosecute white-collar criminals under President Trump,” Warren and Blumenthal wrote in a letter sent on Wednesday, and seen by the Guardian.
Also by Ariana Baio
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 18 articles by Ariana Baio →

Topics

Atlanta Hawks Congress Republican Republicans University of Iowa Hawkeyes

Subjects

Smith PERSON · 19× Trump PERSON · 7× Schmitt PERSON · 5× Republican NORP · 4× Republicans NORP · 4× Atlanta Hawks ORG · 2× Congress ORG · 2× Kennedy PERSON · 2× Lindsey Graham PERSON · 2× University of Iowa Hawkeyes ORG · 2×

Narrative

Ted Cruz, a Republican senator from Texas who became increasingly angry while talking about Smith subpoenaing congressional members’ phone records, told Smith: “Javert from Les Mis would look at you with astonishment.” Cruz insinuated that Smith used his position as a special counsel to target Republicans by requesting records from the Republican National Committee and other conservative lawmakers. Darline Graham, the senator from South Carolina, used her time during the hearing to accuse Smith of “trying to bully” her brother, the late senator Lindsey Graham, and causing him stress with subpoenas. But Smith pushed back on Darline Graham’s assertion.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 Schmitt, who called Smith a “dirtbag”, claimed the prosecutor went to Atlanta to attend a Hawks game on 3 February 2024, and insinuated Smith may have met with Fani Willis, the former Fulton county district attorney who brought state charges against Trump.

Claims (24 extracted, 3 hedged)

Former special counsel Jack Smith, who led two criminal cases against Donald Trump in 2023, faced attacks from Republicans in a wide-ranging hearing on Tuesday that included a basketball mix-up, a reference to the tooth fairy and accusations of perjury. asserted
that → lead → perjury
In the Senate judiciary committee hearing on Tuesday, the Republican senator Eric Schmitt, of Missouri, raised perjury allegations against Smith, seemingly over a mix-up about the Atlanta Hawks and University of Iowa Hawkeyes basketball teams. asserted
senator → raise → teams
Schmitt, who called Smith a “dirtbag”, claimed the prosecutor went to Atlanta to attend a Hawks game on 3 February 2024, and insinuated Smith may have met with Fani Willis, the former Fulton county district attorney who brought state charges against Trump. uncertain
who → call → Trump
But Smith denied ever attending an Atlanta Hawks game. asserted
Smith → deny → game
He later clarified that he attended a University of Iowa Hawkeyes game in Maryland to watch Caitlin Clark play. asserted
Clark → clarify → Maryland
The Democratic senator Amy Klobuchar, of Minnesota, admonished Schmitt for presenting the claim as evidence and accusing Schmitt of lying. uncertain
senator → admonish → Schmitt
“I would just say, for a US senator to have false information, and imply, based on a confusion about the name of a team … that you were in another city, that you were somehow involved, that day, in what was happening in Georgia, and then call you a ‘dirtbag’, is something that deserves an apology,” Klobuchar said. asserted
Klobuchar → say → apology
The Guardian has asked Schmitt’s office for comment. asserted
Guardian → ask → comment
The unusual exchange between Schmitt and Smith became a highlight of the hearing on social media. asserted
exchange → become → media
Smith also testified to the Senate judiciary committee to defend his handling of two federal investigations into Trump – one related to efforts to overturn the 2020 election and the other regarding Trump’s mishandling of classified documents. asserted
Smith → testify → documents
Both cases were dismissed before going to trial. Republicans have accused Smith of bringing the investigations to undermine Trump and targeting Republicans in the process – including by subpoenaing phone records from members of Congress. asserted
Republicans → dismiss → Congress
Smith has defended his practices, saying the subpoenas were necessary to collect evidence that Trump called members of Congress to try to delay the certification of the 2020 presidential election. But Tuesday’s hearing was also defined by other tense exchanges between Republican senators and Smith. asserted
hearing → defend → senators
The Republican John Kennedy, of Louisiana, appeared frustrated after raising accusations that former president Joe Biden or his White House staff told the then attorney general Merrick Garland to prosecute Trump – an allegation with no public evidence. asserted
Biden → appear → evidence
Smith said he did not know about conversations between Biden and Garland regarding the subject. asserted
he → say → subject
“Do you believe in the Tooth Fairy?” Kennedy asked Smith. asserted
Kennedy → believe → Smith
The question elicited a response from Smith: “I no longer believe in the Easter Bunny.” asserted
I → elicit → Bunny
At one point, Kennedy told Smith: “You make me want to throw up in my mouth.” asserted
me → tell → mouth
Ted Cruz, a Republican senator from Texas who became increasingly angry while talking about Smith subpoenaing congressional members’ phone records, told Smith: “Javert from Les Mis would look at you with astonishment.” Cruz insinuated that Smith used his position as a special counsel to target Republicans by requesting records from the Republican National Committee and other conservative lawmakers. Darline Graham, the senator from South Carolina, used her time during the hearing to accuse Smith of “trying to bully” her brother, the late senator Lindsey Graham, and causing him stress with subpoenas. But Smith pushed back on Darline Graham’s assertion. asserted
Smith → become → assertion
“I believe your brother was a patriotic public servant. asserted
brother → believe → ?
He was not a target of our investigation, and in fact he likely would have been a witness in our case,” Smith replied, adding that Lindsey Graham did not believe the 2020 election was stolen. asserted
election → reply → case
Democrats, meanwhile, used Tuesday’s hearing to highlight the 6 January 2021 attack on the US Capitol and accused Trump of inciting the violent mob with false claims of election fraud during the 2020 presidential election. uncertain
Democrats → use → election
Cory Booker, the senator from New Jersey, declared the hearing “a farce”. asserted
hearing → declare → Jersey
Booker and Delaware’s Chris Coons highlighted that the current administration had fired justice department staffers who worked on Smith’s team. Despite the partisan divide over Smith’s appointment and prosecutions, Smith said he maintained a nonpartisan approach to the investigations into Trump and that his team had compiled enough evidence to prosecute the president. asserted
team → highlight → president
“If asked whether to prosecute a former president today, based on the same facts, I would do so regardless of whether that president was a Republican or a Democrat,” Smith said in his opening statement. asserted
Smith → ask → statement
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support