That is 0 articles you have read today.
The Aporia is free and carries no advertising, so readers are the only
thing paying for it. If you are getting this much out of it, a small
donation is what keeps it independent.
Daily limit reached
You have read 0 articles today.
That is more than the 15 a day The Aporia gives away,
and well past what it can carry on nothing. Your allowance resets at
midnight.
There is no advertising here and nothing about you is sold, so readers
are the only thing paying for it. If the site is worth this much of
your day, it is worth a few dollars.
Everything else stays open: the
maps, the
directory and
search do
not count against this, and neither does re-opening something you have
already read today.
New York Post
· collected 2026-09-29 · by Priscilla DeGregory, Georgia Worrell
Prosecutors in Lindsay Clancy’s murder case are requesting a gag order from a judge to prevent further media commentary that could influence future jurors or prejudice a potential retrial. They argue this is necessary after defense attorney Kevin Reddington made comments about a holdout juror who wanted to convict Clancy, revealing details that identified the juror as Michael Desronvil. Prosecutors claim Reddington’s statements should be limited to avoid prejudicing any future proceedings and maintain fairness in the judicial process.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-02,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Story summary
In Plymouth, Massachusetts, prosecutors in Lindsay Clancy's murder case have asked a judge to impose a gag order to prevent further media commentary that could affect public perception and future trials. The request was made after defense attorney Kevin Reddington made "disturbing" comments about the lone holdout juror during the trial from July 21, 2026, to September 4, 2026. Prosecutors argue that Reddington's revelations, such as identifying the gender of the holdout as male when there were only three men on the jury panel, ensured public identification of the juror, specifically Michael Desronvil. They also claim Reddington’s statements imply bias and misconduct by the holdout, potentially influencing potential jurors' beliefs.
Written for “Lindsay Clancy Prosecution” on 2026-10-04,
grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Prosecutors in Lindsay Clancy’s murder case are asking a judge to put a gag order in place after her defense attorney made comments in the media about the lone holdout juror who wanted to convict her.
asserted
who → ask → her
“In order to prevent the carnival atmosphere that was the trial between July 21, 2026, and September 4, 2026, as well as the aftermath since, this court can and should limit the extrajudicial statements made in this case …” prosecutors wrote in court papers Monday.
asserted
prosecutors → prevent → papers
While Clancy’s lawyer, Kevin Reddington, commented on just about everything in the case, from witness testimony to his client’s feelings and character, the “most disturbing” comments from him were about the jury and the holdout juror, prosecutors claimed.
asserted
prosecutors → comment → jury
They said the fact that Reddington revealed the holdout’s gender as a man, when there were only three men on the panel, “ensured that the juror would be publicly identified.”
asserted
juror → say → panel
Reddington also claimed the holdout — who has since been identified as Michael Desronvil — “robbed the defendant of an acquittal,” the prosecutors claimed.
asserted
prosecutors → claim → acquittal
They said the defense attorney’s comments should be limited to stop any future potential jurors from forming beliefs about the case ahead of time and prevent any prejudice to a second trial.
asserted
comments → say → trial
Jurors from Clancy’s first trial, which ended with a hung jury, have since revealed that 11 of them were prepared to find the 36-year-old mother not guilty by reason of insanity while Desronvil wanted to convict her on the first-degree murder charges she faced.
asserted
she → end → charges
Reddington claimed at trial that Clancy shouldn’t be held criminally responsible because she was in the throes of severe postpartum psychosis and heard a voice commanding her to kill her three kids, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months.
asserted
she → claim → kids
Prosecutors, however, claim Clancy carefully and coldly planned and carried out the murders.
uncertain
Clancy → claim → murders
The Aporia
