May President Trump Exclude CNN from Air Force One? Very Likely Yes

Read the original at Reason ↗
Reason · collected 2026-09-26 · by Eugene Volokh

Quick Summary

President Trump has excluded CNN from traveling on Air Force One, following his earlier unsuccessful attempt to ban them from the White House press briefing room. This move is legally permissible according to a 2025 D.C. Circuit decision in AP v. Budowich, which affirmed that restricted spaces like Air Force One are not subject to First Amendment protections against viewpoint discrimination. The decision allows the President discretion over who can access such spaces based on their viewpoint or other considerations.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

On September 25, 2026, the White House barred CNN from flying with President Donald Trump on Air Force One for his trip to Knoxville, Tennessee, on September 26, where he was scheduled to attend a college football game. This decision followed a previous ban by Trump against CNN and other outlets like MS NOW and Politico from covering his daily activities at the White House. Despite a judge’s order restoring access to the White House grounds for these networks, the ruling did not address Air Force One pool duties. The spot meant for CNN was instead given to Real America's Voice News, a conservative network. This move escalates an ongoing dispute over media freedoms and highlights concerns about First Amendment implications.

Written for “CNN Barred From Air Force One” on 2026-10-05, grounded in this article and the 20 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
27%
12 of 44 hedged
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
65.8
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
21
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-26 · how these are computed

Story

📰 CNN Barred From Air Force One
Politics · 21 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 27% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
BBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 13 📰 publisher trust 78
“Both articles describe President Trump excluding CNN from traveling with him on Air Force One, specifically for a trip to Tennessee on September 26, 2026.”
ABC News (AU)
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 8% hedged 2 of 25 📰 publisher trust 61
“Both articles describe President Trump excluding CNN from traveling on Air Force One at the same time and place.”
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 10% hedged 1 of 10 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe President Trump excluding CNN from traveling with him on Air Force One for a trip to Tennessee.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 3 📰 publisher trust 63
“Both articles describe CNN being excluded from Air Force One for a specific trip, likely related to Trump's visit to a college football game.”
Mother Jones
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 29% hedged 4 of 14 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles describe different incidents: one about news networks pausing coverage of presidential events due to Trump banning CNN from the White House, and another about Trump excluding CNN from Air Force One.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 12% hedged 2 of 17 📰 publisher trust 68
“Both articles describe President Trump excluding CNN from Air Force One for a scheduled trip on September 26th.”
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 6% hedged 1 of 16 📰 publisher trust 77
“Both articles describe President Trump excluding CNN from traveling on Air Force One for an upcoming trip.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 19 📰 publisher trust 64
“Both articles describe President Trump excluding CNN from Air Force One for his trip to Tennessee on the same day.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 15% hedged 2 of 13 📰 publisher trust 72
“Both articles describe President Trump excluding CNN from traveling on Air Force One during a trip to Tennessee.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans right 🔴 33% hedged 1 of 3 📰 publisher trust 67
“Both articles discuss CNN being blocked from traveling with President Trump on Air Force One for a trip to Knoxville, Tennessee.”

Publisher

Reason · 529 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)
2026-10-02
Would a Firing Squad Have Been More 'Humane' for Christa Pike?
2026-09-26
"I Will Not Stand for Being Jerked Around … by Any Lawyer Who Practices Before Me"
2026-09-18
New Article: Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections: Bringing Clarity To The Necessary and Proper Clause
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

Eugene Volokh
117 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Since 2020, the Department has also collected the names of individual foreign donors while stating that it would not publish them.
🔮 When officers told him he would need to move, Geri refused and threatened to throw one of his explosive devices into the street to demonstrate its destructive power.
🔮 Here's an excerpt from the discussion of why Matar was acting sufficiently under the direction of a foreign terrorist organization (which is required under the relevant federal statute) rather than just independently—if he had been acting independently, that would have still been attempted murder punishable under state law, but likely not a violation of these statutes:
🔮 Because in the late 1800s, "race" was understood to include what today might refer to "ethnicity" (e.g., German, Arab, Jewish), the Court concluded that § 1981 extends to such discrimination based on ethnicity.
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent From yesterday's Blackman v. Substack, Inc., by California Court of Appeal Justices Tracie Brown and Danny Chou and Marin County Judge Andrew Sweet: "'[I]f a newspaper lawfully obtains truthful information about a matter of public significance then state officials may not constitutionally punish publication of the information, absent a need to further a state interest of the highest order.'"
🔮 On June 7th of 2020, while Stephanie Rapkin was sleeping in her bed, members of the Shorewood and Whitefish Bay police departments were outside her home, trying to think of an excuse to enter, so they could arrest her on allegations that she pushed a protestor picketing outside of her home.
🔮 I mean, I could list off all kinds of examples, but we're not here for an art history lesson.
🔮 On August 21, 2024—the same day that StopAntisemitism shared its feature on plaintiff—Valley Catholic informed plaintiff that it would not be renewing her contract for the 2024-2025 school year….
🔮 The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted.
🔮 Ms. Freeman will answer EVERY question that is put to her—whether or not the question was asked previously.
Also by Eugene Volokh
Open Thread
2026-10-04 · Reason
Open Thread
2026-10-03 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 117 articles by Eugene Volokh →

Topics

Air Force One CNN D.C. Circuit First Amendment the White House

Subjects

the White House ORG · 7× Trump PERSON · 3× CNN ORG · 2× Knight PERSON · 2× Sherrill PERSON · 2× AP v. Budowich ORG · 1× D.C. Circuit ORG · 1× Volokh PERSON · 1× Washington ORG · 1× White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

Finally, note that, just as the precedents that limit revocation of White House press passes don't apply to exclusion from the Oval Office and Air Force One, the Thursday order's terms likewise cover only White House press passes: Defendants (except for President Trump) and their agents, representatives, and all persons or entities acting in concert with them shall immediately return, reinstate, and restore the White House "hard pass" press credentials held by employees of CNN, MS NOW, and POLITICO that were revoked on or about September 18, 2026, until further Order of the Court or the expiration of this Temporary Restraining Order. So the President's Air Force One decision doesn't violate the district court's order, as well as being consistent with D.C. Circuit precedent.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-26
🔮 The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted.

Claims (44 extracted, 12 hedged)

After being blocked in his attempt to keep CNN out of the White House altogether (including the main press briefing room), President Trump has excluded CNN from traveling with him on Air Force One. asserted
Trump → block → Force
This, though, he is quite likely allowed to do. asserted
he → allow → This
As you likely recall, last year Trump kicked AP out of the Oval Office press pool, because the AP had refused (in my view correctly refused) to call the Gulf of Mexico "the Gulf of America." asserted
AP → recall → America
A D.C. Circuit panel majority, to oversimplify slightly, concluded that this was constitutionally permissible, both as to the Oval Office and as to Air Force One. asserted
this → oversimplify → One
The White House is likely to succeed on the merits because these restricted presidential spaces {Oval Office, … Air Force One, and … the President's home in Mar-a-Lago} are not First Amendment fora opened for private speech and discussion. asserted
spaces → succeed → speech
The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted. asserted
journalists → retain → viewpoint
The majority concluded that those spaces differed from some more broadly open spaces in the White House: asserted
spaces → conclude → House
Reporters and photographers have long been permitted access to the White House complex to cover the President and his administration. asserted
Reporters → permit → President
The White House manages access by requiring journalists to obtain a press credential called a hard pass. asserted
House → manage → credential
More than one thousand journalists hold hard passes, through which they may access spaces such as the James S. Brady Briefing Room, where the White House Press Secretary delivers regular briefings. uncertain
Secretary → hold → briefings
Hard pass holders may also sign up via a reservation system to attend larger events hosted in the East Room, which is often used for meetings with foreign leaders, executive order signings, and press conferences. uncertain
which → sign → leaders
Because the White House has opened these press facilities "to all bona fide Washington-based journalists," hard passes may not be denied arbitrarily or based on the content of a journalist's speech. uncertain
passes → open → speech
When the White House opens its facilities to the press generally, as it does in the Brady Briefing Room, it cannot exclude journalists based on viewpoint. asserted
it → open → viewpoint
On the other hand, we have never suggested that there are any First Amendment restrictions on "the discretion of the President to grant interviews or briefings with selected journalists." uncertain
we → suggest → journalists
In deciding which journalists to speak with, the President may of course take into account their viewpoint. uncertain
President → decide → viewpoint
If President Trump sits down for an interview with Laura Ingraham, he is not required to do the same with Rachel Maddow. asserted
he → sit → Maddow
The First Amendment does not control the President's discretion in choosing with whom to speak or to whom to provide personal access. asserted
Amendment → control → access
It is a time honored and entirely mundane aspect of our competitive and free press that public officials "regularly subject all reporters to some form of differential treatment based on whether they approve of the reporters' expression." asserted
they → honor → expression
These uncontested principles provide the framework for assessing the AP's claim that the Oval Office and other restricted spaces become nonpublic fora [in which viewpoint discrimination is forbidden -EV] when the White House selects a small group of journalists (such as the press pool) to be present for observational newsgathering and reporting…. uncertain
House → provide → newsgathering
The Oval Office is the President's office, over which he has absolute control and discretion to exclude the public or members of the press. asserted
he → have → press
As the district court explained, the Oval Office "is a highly controlled location … shrouded behind a labyrinth of security protocols," which "few members of the public will ever" enter. asserted
members → explain → public
The President uses the space for myriad purposes, including speeches, signing ceremonies, and meetings with senior officials or heads of state. asserted
President → use → state
When events in the Oval Office are broadcast to the public, they feature the President's speech and expressive activity. asserted
they → broadcast → speech
It hardly needs to be said that the Oval Office, Air Force One, or even the East Room are not places "traditionally open to assembly and debate," nor are they open to the public for expressive activity…. asserted
they → need → activity
Only about one percent of hard pass holders can fit in spaces like the Oval Office. asserted
percent → fit → Office
{Both the AP and the district court at various points suggest that if the White House maintains something like the press pool, it must allow access on a viewpoint neutral basis. asserted
it → suggest → basis
For the reasons already explained, a group of journalists observing presidential events is not a forum of any sort. asserted
group → explain → sort
Accordingly, the White House should not have to choose between excluding all journalists and admitting journalists under the restrictions of a nonpublic forum. asserted
House → have → forum
By recognizing the distinctions between different fora "we encourage the government to open its property to some expressive activity in cases where, if faced with an all-or-nothing choice, it might not open the property at all."} uncertain
it → recognize → property
… The messages conveyed in the Oval Office are government speech and opportunities for the President's administration to express its message. asserted
administration → convey → message
"When government speech is involved, forum analysis does not apply and the Government may favor or espouse a particular viewpoint." uncertain
Government → involve → viewpoint
Choosing who may observe or possibly speak with the President in these spaces is not the type of action that supports a retaliation claim. uncertain
that → choose → claim
Rather, it is more akin to a decision about how the President wields the bully pulpit…. asserted
President → wield → pulpit
To be sure, CNN has also argued that the revocation of its reporters' White House press passes violated the Due Process Clause as well as the First Amendment. asserted
revocation → argue → Clause
Indeed, the judge's order Thursday morning requiring the White House to reinstate those press passes relied on the Due Process Clause, and didn't reach the First Amendment. asserted
order → require → Amendment
(The D.C. Circuit Sherrill v. Knight decision, which the judge relied on Thursday and which AP v. Budowich discussed, concluded that denial of a White House press pass based on viewpoint would violate both the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause.) asserted
denial → rely → Amendment
But the logic of the D.C. Circuit AP v. Budowich decision, it seems to me, applies equally to the Due Process Clause. asserted
it → seem → Clause
The Sherrill precedent expressly yoked the First Amendment and Due Process Clause claims together: uncertain
precedent → yoke → Amendment
In our view, the procedural requirements of notice of the factual bases for denial, an opportunity for the applicant to respond to these, and a final written statement of the reasons for denial are compelled by the foregoing determination that the interest of a bona fide Washington correspondent in obtaining a White House press pass is protected by the first amendment. asserted
interest → respond → amendment
This first amendment interest undoubtedly qualifies as liberty which may not be denied without due process of law under the fifth amendment. uncertain
which → qualify → amendment
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support