Trump is right about the ABA — and we have the receipts

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-03 · by Jeffrey Lax
Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗

Summary

The author of this opinion piece claims that the American Bar Association (ABA) has failed in its duty to enforce standards protecting equal opportunity, academic freedom, and nondiscrimination, citing their own organization's experience with a law school that adopted an anti-Israel boycott policy as evidence. The policy at City University of New York School of Law targeted Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews, violating several ABA standards including those related to nondiscrimination and academic freedom. Despite submitting multiple complaints, the ABA failed to take adequate action, leading the author to accuse them of being "captured by ideology." The key date mentioned is June 27, 2022, when the organization filed its first formal complaint with the ABA Council on Legal Education.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-03, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
45
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
7%
3 of 45 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
96.5
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Education
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-03 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

The American Bar Association (ABA) has been accused of failing to enforce its own standards against discrimination and antisemitism, particularly towards Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews. The ABA's accrediting power for law schools is at risk due to a recent recommendation from the Trump administration. An organization called S.A.F.E. Campus, which documents cases of antisemitism on campuses, has exposed the ABA's failure to act in several instances. One such case involved the City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law, where faculty members adopted a boycott, divestment, and sanctions resolution targeting Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews in May 2022. The ABA was criticized for dismissing complaints without explanation and refusing to hear victims' accounts, suggesting it is "captured by ideology" and unwilling to address antisemitism.

Written for “ABA Education Criticisms” on 2026-09-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.85 Confidence high
Leaning score +0.85 for article 3645 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-03

Story

📰 ABA Education Criticisms
Education · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 43 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.070 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Jeffrey Lax
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The ABA’s response, dismissal without explanation, refusal to hear victims, and institutional self-protection, reveals an accreditor captured by ideology and unwilling to police antisemitism when it targets Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Israel Israeli Israeli Americans Jewish Zionist Jews

Subjects

Israel GPE · 5× Jewish NORP · 5× ABA ORG · 4× Israeli NORP · 4× Zionist NORP · 4× CUNY Law’s ORG · 3× Israeli Americans NORP · 3× Zionist Jews NORP · 3× CUNY ORG · 2× Hillel ORG · 2×

Narrative

We documented how this violated ABA Standard 105, requiring council acquiescence for a significant change in mission or objectives; Standard 205, nondiscrimination on the basis of religion and nationality; Standard 206, diversity and inclusion, including ethnicity; and Standard 405, academic freedom.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-03
🔮 The ABA’s response, dismissal without explanation, refusal to hear victims, and institutional self-protection, reveals an accreditor captured by ideology and unwilling to police antisemitism when it targets Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews.
2026-09-03 · Washington Examiner
Trump is right about the ABA — and we have the receipts · assertive framing

Claims (45 extracted, 3 hedged)

The Trump administration’s recent recommendation to strip the American Bar Association of its near-monopoly power to accredit law schools is not a partisan overreach. asserted
recommendation → strip → schools
It is a long-overdue reckoning with an organization that has abandoned its core duty: enforcing standards that protect equal opportunity, academic freedom, and nondiscrimination. asserted
that → abandon → opportunity
An organization I founded, S.A.F.E. Campus, formerly S.A.F.E. CUNY, has lived this failure firsthand. asserted
I → found → failure
Our repeated, detailed complaints against the City University of New York School of Law exposed textbook violations of the ABA’s own standards. asserted
complaints → repeat → standards
The ABA’s response, dismissal without explanation, refusal to hear victims, and institutional self-protection, reveals an accreditor captured by ideology and unwilling to police antisemitism when it targets Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews. asserted
it → hear → Americans
On May 12, 2022, CUNY Law’s faculty members, who also function as administrators, unanimously adopted as institutional policy a boycott, divestment, and sanctions resolution previously passed by the student government. uncertain
who → function → government
That policy targeted Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews among the students and faculty, sometimes by name and with identifying links. asserted
policy → target → links
It endorsed the boycott and elimination of Hillel, the most widespread Jewish campus organization in America, and the elimination of Jewish student exchange programs and faculty fellowships connected to Israel. asserted
It → endorse → Israel
It institutionalized an academic boycott of Israeli universities, Israeli scholars, and anyone collaborating with them. asserted
It → institutionalize → them
It called for boycotting and divesting from a long list of companies: Boeing, GE, Lockheed Martin, Caterpillar, IBM, Sabra, PepsiCo, and others, simply for any connection to Israel. asserted
It → call → Israel
Most bizarrely, it demanded a boycott of the New York City Police Department, the Department of Homeland Security, LexisNexis, and Westlaw. asserted
it → demand → Security
How students and faculty were supposed to conduct legal research was left unexplained. asserted
supposed → suppose → research
It created a hostile environment for Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews. asserted
It → create → Americans
The resolution itself doxed specific Jewish CUNY students and faculty for the “crime” of being born in Israel or identifying as Zionist. asserted
resolution → doxe → Zionist
Donating to a Jewish charity with Israeli ties, burying a relative in Israel, or attending a synagogue that sponsors Israel trips would, under the policy’s logic, subject someone to the boycott. asserted
that → donate → boycott
We documented how this violated ABA Standard 105, requiring council acquiescence for a significant change in mission or objectives; Standard 205, nondiscrimination on the basis of religion and nationality; Standard 206, diversity and inclusion, including ethnicity; and Standard 405, academic freedom. asserted
this → document → ethnicity
Interpretation 206-2 itself emphasizes that a diverse student body breaks down stereotypes, yet CUNY Law’s policy sought to exclude two underrepresented groups: Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews. asserted
policy → emphasize → groups
We filed our first formal complaint with the ABA Council on Legal Education on June 27, 2022. asserted
We → file → June
On Dec. 1 of that year, the ABA closed the matter with a form letter from manager Sara Stretch. asserted
ABA → close → Stretch
After “a thorough review” of our complaint and the law school’s response, the ABA concluded that the facts “fail to allege a violation” of the standards. asserted
facts → conclude → standards
No explanation why targeting people by nationality, religion, and ethnicity did not trigger Standards 205 and 206. asserted
targeting → target → Standards
We returned in June 2023 with a second complaint, a few weeks after CUNY Law’s commencement address by Fatima Moussa Mohammed provided vivid evidence of active implementation. asserted
address → return → implementation
Mohammed’s speech celebrated “rage” and pressure against those who “crossed the BDS picket line.” asserted
who → celebrate → line
Hillel remained banned from the campus. asserted
Hillel → ban → campus
A highly qualified Zionist Jewish professor reported that his dean application received no response, attributing it to the Zionist identity clear on his curriculum vitae. asserted
application → report → vitae
On May 30 of that year, CUNY’s own Board of Trustees and chancellor issued a public statement conceding that the speech constituted “hate toward people and communities based on their religion, race or political affiliation.” uncertain
speech → issue → religion
They explicitly distinguished it from protected free speech and declared it had no place on campus. asserted
it → distinguish → campus
Here, CUNY’s highest authorities admitted the environment was discriminatory hate, and the ABA still refused to act. asserted
ABA → admit → ?
Throughout 2022, 2023, and into 2024, we repeatedly requested the opportunity to present testimony from victims: Israeli American and Zionist Jewish students bullied out of the school, faculty facing professional retaliation. asserted
we → request → retaliation
The ABA refused every time. asserted
ABA → refuse → ?
Managing director William E. Adams Jr. stonewalled. asserted
Jr. → stonewall → ?
When we pressed for a meeting and an independent review of the ABA’s process under Rule 45 of alleged mishandling, Adams offered only limited reconsideration under Rule 41 for “new issues,” then suggested the council itself would decide whether to investigate its own prior decision. uncertain
council → press → decision
We rejected that as an obvious conflict of interest. asserted
We → reject → interest
Asking the accused body to investigate itself is the definition of a sham process. asserted
body → ask → process
Our emails documenting these exchanges, copied to Education Department officials, show a pattern of indifference to the safety of Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews and to basic due process. asserted
emails → document → process
The ABA’s dual role as both a trade association for lawyers and the exclusive federal gatekeeper for law school accreditation creates precisely the structural conflict the Education Department has now flagged. asserted
Department → create → conflict
When confronted with clear evidence of discrimination against Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews, evidence so stark that CUNY’s own leadership called it unprotected hate, the ABA chose institutional protection over enforcement of its own standards. asserted
ABA → confront → standards
It enforces diversity mandates aggressively in other contexts yet looks away when the targeted groups are Israeli Americans and Zionist Jews. asserted
groups → enforce → contexts
It is selective enforcement that greenlights antisemitism under the banner of progressive politics. asserted
that → greenlight → politics
Stripping the ABA of its recognition authority or, at a minimum, imposing radical structural reform that separates accreditation from advocacy and requires transparent, reasoned decisions with victim testimony, is the only responsible path. asserted
that → strip → testimony
…and 5 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support