Trump doubles down on his attack on Harry and Meghan and condemns prince's 'terrible' treatment of William

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Robinson, M. (2026, September 3). Trump doubles down on his attack on Harry and Meghan and condemns prince's 'terrible' treatment of William. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16101777/Trump-says-wouldnt-let-Harry-Meghan-UK-terrible-treatment-William-King-Charles-late-Queen.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-03 · by Martin Robinson

Quick Summary

Donald Trump has doubled down on his criticism of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, accusing them of being "very terrible" to Prince William. Speaking to GB News, the US President claimed that Meghan had a "horrible" influence on her husband and that their actions were too divisive for him to welcome them back into royal circles. Trump suggested that King Charles's decision to meet with Harry and Meghan shows he is a more forgiving person than himself. The President said he would not have taken them back, implying that the rift between William and his brother was a result of the Sussexes' actions.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-03, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Donald Trump has attacked Prince Harry and Meghan Markle again, accusing them of being "very terrible" to Prince William. This latest statement came after they returned to the UK after six years in the US, where Harry wrote a memoir and made public criticisms of the British royal family. Trump claimed he would never speak to them again and implied that Meghan has had a "horrible" influence on her husband. He also suggested that King Charles is doing a better job by meeting with the couple than he would have done in their situation, stating he would not have welcomed them back so easily.

Written for “Prince Harry Feud with Trump” on 2026-10-19, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Prince Harry Feud with Trump
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
National Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 21% hedged 7 of 34 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A discusses Trump's attack on Harry and Meghan, while Article B discusses Prince Harry's return to Britain and the debate about his security”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 6 of 95 📰 publisher trust 73
“Article A discusses Trump's attack on Harry and Meghan, while Article B focuses on their return to Britain and its implications for the monarchy”
Daily Mail
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 14% hedged 5 of 37 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A describes a statement from Trump attacking Harry and Meghan, while Article B mentions the Sussexes' return to the UK and their preparations for school run”
NBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 no claims extracted 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article B does not mention Trump's comments, suggesting that they cover a different aspect of the controversy surrounding Harry and Meghan's return to the UK”
New York Post
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 23% hedged 3 of 13 📰 publisher trust 67
“Article A reports on a statement made by Donald Trump, while Article B reports on Prince Harry's actions and interactions with his father after returning to the UK”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 29% hedged 11 of 38 📰 publisher trust 64
“Article A reports on Donald Trump's attack on Harry and Meghan, while Article B discusses the King's declaration on their return to Britain, indicating a different event and perspective”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 6 📰 publisher trust 60
“Article A mentions an attack by Trump on Prince Harry and Meghan, while Article B describes a confirmation by Charles about their royal status after their return to U.K.”
CBS News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 66
“Article A discusses Donald Trump's attack on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, while Article B mentions King Charles III's clarification about their status as non-working royals”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
56
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
3 of 56 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 6288 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Martin Robinson
50 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Where would you recommend for a first date?
2026-10-16 · assertive framing · My London: George MacKay
🔮 Meghan allegedly told him the blunder had humiliated her and declared she could never wear his designs again.
🔮 In contrast to that, I have what may be considered a sophisticated way of handling painting.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · The new generation of London artists to know
🔮 Meghan and Harry will make their first joint public appearance since moving back to the UK today, but the Duchess intends to keep such events 'rare'.
🔮 Meghan and Harry will this week make their first joint public appearance since moving back to the UK as 'private citizens', embarking on a series of unofficial quasi-royal engagements in the East Midlands.
🔮 Basically, the paint on the discs will respond to shifts in in heat and light, so when the bells chime and the light shifts in the room, the painting change before your eyes.
🔮 He also suggested Claridge's and its privacy-conscious VIP clientele may be unhappy with the 'pantomime' surrounding the pair's afternoon tea.
🔮 Saying, ‘you need to get your act together if you really want this, you would have done the work by now.’
🔮 Harry was paid to give his 99-minute 'masterclass' on coping with grief and may have pocketed $100,000 plus a share of subscription revenue in the process.
🔮 'I asked if I could change the channel on the TV and an officer said he was going to punch me.
Also by Martin Robinson
My London: George MacKay
2026-10-16 · Evening Standard
The new generation of London artists to know
2026-10-15 · Evening Standard
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 50 articles by Martin Robinson →

Topics

America British Daily Mail GB News Sussex

Subjects

Prince Harry PERSON · 8× Charles PERSON · 7× Harry PERSON · 7× Trump PERSON · 7× Meghan PERSON · 6× Meghan Markle PERSON · 4× Donald Trump PERSON · 3× Prince William PERSON · 3× Sussexes PERSON · 3× William PERSON · 3×

Narrative

Katie Miller, the wife of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, shared a report about their move on social media, noting: 'They are moving back to Britain because they don't like President Trump.' Conservative personality Megyn Kelly also responded to their move and their decision to step down as senior members of the working family six years ago – a decision many dubbed 'Megxit.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-03
🔮 - See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source Donald Trump today doubled down on his attack on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, accusing them of being 'very terrible' to Prince William and insisting he would 'never speak to them again'.

Claims (56 extracted, 3 hedged)

- See more Daily Mail on Google - save us as a Preferred Source Donald Trump today doubled down on his attack on Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, accusing them of being 'very terrible' to Prince William and insisting he would 'never speak to them again'. asserted
he → see → them
The US President also appeared to largely blame the Duchess of Sussex for the rift with the Royal Family, accusing her of having a 'horrible' influence on her British husband. asserted
President → appear → husband
His fresh attack came 24 hours after he claimed he 'wouldn't have taken them back' following their shock return to the UK. asserted
he → come → UK
Speaking to GB News host Bev Turner, Mr Trump said the Sussexes had done 'too many horrible things' to be welcomed back so easily. asserted
Sussexes → speak → things
The fact that the King had recently met Harry and Meghan showed Charles is 'a much better person than I am', Mr Trump said. asserted
Trump → meet → Harry
'I wouldn't have done it. asserted
I → do → it
I would have said forget it,' he said. asserted
he → say → it
'Personally, I would not have taken them back. asserted
I → take → them
Meghan and Harry have returned to the UK after six years and the President said he was 'happy' they had left the US. asserted
they → return → US
He said: 'First of all, I think King Charles is fantastic, he's a friend of mine. asserted
he → say → mine
He [Prince Harry] wrote a book that was so bad, and she was a horrible influence on him. asserted
she → write → him
What she's done to him is unacceptable.' asserted
done → do → him
Mr Trump argued that the way the couple treated Harry's brother, Prince William, was also 'terrible'. asserted
couple → argue → brother
He said: 'But I think that what she [Meghan] has done and him [Prince Harry], he wrote a book that was very terrible to William, it was terrible. asserted
it → say → William
The things he said, I wouldn't... asserted
I → say → ?
I mean, it's just me. asserted
it → mean → ?
I'm sure I'm wrong on this, but I would not have taken him back. asserted
I → take → him
I would have never spoken to him again.' Donald Trump has said that he 'wouldn't have taken Prince Harry and Meghan Markle back' and suggested Prince William is right to 'never speak to them again' The President said Harry and Meghan had been guilty of 'too much hate, too many really bad things' He said the Sussexes, and particularly Harry, had been 'very terrible' to Prince William uncertain
Sussexes → speak → William
Ms Turner suggested that, although there appears to be 'no relationship' between Prince Harry and Prince William, the King appears to have 'offered an olive branch' to his son and daughter-in-law. uncertain
King → suggest → son
Mr Trump responded: 'It shows you what a good man King Charles is. asserted
Charles → respond → you
I wouldn't have done it. asserted
I → do → it
I would have said forget it.' asserted
I → say → it
Ms Turner then joked: 'But your children probably wouldn't have done what Harry did to his father, the relationship is different.' asserted
relationship → joke → father
Mr Trump laughed, telling her: 'Well, I hope not!' asserted
I → laugh → her
Heaping further praise on the King, the US President reflected on the monarch's recent visit to America and how 'everybody loved him'. asserted
everybody → heap → him
He told Ms Turner: 'If I were King Charles, I would not take them back. asserted
I → tell → them
He was here a couple of months ago, everybody loved him in America. asserted
everybody → love → America
He spoke in front of Congress, everybody loved him. asserted
everybody → speak → him
I knew him as Prince Charles, I know him as King Charles, and he's amazing and he's fighting through a very tough situation with his health, and very few people would have that bravery to do what he's done. asserted
he → know → what
They are back in the UK Prince Harry and his then-fiancee, Meghan Markle, pose for a photograph in the Sunken Garden at Kensington Palace in 2017 President Donald Trump had earlier cheered the news of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's surprise return to the UK. asserted
Trump → pose → UK
Speaking of the Sussexes' decision to leave their home in Montecito and move back to Britain, Trump said: 'I'm happy about it. asserted
I → speak → it
'I was not a fan,' he added, noting that he had a 'very good relationship with the Queen and with [King] Charles'. asserted
he → add → Charles
'I thought they treated the Royal Family with great disrespect. asserted
they → think → disrespect
I didn't like it,' Trump told reporters of Harry and Meghan. asserted
Trump → like → Harry
'I didn't like the way she acted. asserted
she → like → way
' 'I thought she was terribly disrespectful to the Queen, to King Charles,' Trump said of Meghan's behaviour and the couple's decision to step back from their royal duties six years ago. asserted
Trump → think → duties
Harry and Meghan told King Charles last month that they would be moving back to Britain with their children, Archie, seven, and Lilibet, five, who are slated to begin school there this week. asserted
who → tell → school
The Sussexes are now staying in the UK for an 'extended period' after flying into the country on August 26. asserted
Sussexes → stay → August
The family is said to be eyeing a home in the Cotswolds. asserted
family → say → Cotswolds
While the couple appeared to be leading a quiet, private life in Montecito, California, the pair had made no secret of their disillusionment with the current administration. And with the November midterm elections fast approaching, concerns about the direction of the US have been top-of-mind, People magazine first reported. asserted
magazine → appear → mind
…and 16 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support