Nicholas Decker In Hell

Read the original at Astral Codex Ten ↗
Cite

Alexander, S. (2026, September 3). Nicholas Decker In Hell. Astral Codex Ten. https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/nicholas-decker-in-hell

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Astral Codex Ten · collected 2026-09-03 · by Scott Alexander commentary

Quick Summary

Econblogger Nicholas Decker writes about his skepticism of a proposal in AI 2040 to pause development and research alignment before proceeding. He argues that alignment is not a grand theory, but rather fixing individual bugs in the system, which can be done iteratively like aviation safety research. The article then presents an analogy where Decker is transported to Hell and enslaved by demons who are slower and less intelligent than him, illustrating how he would adapt to the situation and even gain some freedom with minimal effort. Decker uses this scenario to challenge the idea that a period of researching alignment is necessary, suggesting it can be done incrementally like in his hypothetical Hellish existence.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-03, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Nicholas Decker, an economist blogger, has expressed skepticism about the proposal in AI 2040 to pause AI development and focus on researching alignment before proceeding. He argues that this approach is impractical and that "researching alignment" is just patching bugs in the system without truly understanding it. Instead of searching for a grand theory, Decker suggests that aviation safety research provides a better model - addressing specific problems as they arise through proactive testing, building redundancy, and monitoring for threats.

Written for “Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting” on 2026-10-20, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Persuasion
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 33% hedged 1 of 3
“The events described are two separate interviews or discussions about AI, one with Francis Fukuyama and Bob Wright and another with Nicholas Decker”
CBC News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 10% hedged 4 of 39 📰 publisher trust 74
“Article A discusses AI 2040 and the proposal to pause development of AI for alignment research, while Article B refers to a hack by OpenAI agents in July and a warning letter signed by tech companies”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
161
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
17 of 161 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Astral Codex Ten · 56 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Scott Alexander
48 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I may have more of these in the upcoming week.
2026-10-19 · assertive framing · Open Thread 456
🔮 [This is one of the finalists in the 2026 book review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done.
2026-10-17 · assertive framing · Your Book Review: Storm Of Steel
🔮 AI companies like Anthropic and OpenAI have long mentioned the possibility that their products could be existentially dangerous, but this has recently crescendoed into even more dire warnings, including suggestions that we have to pace the frontier, ie coordinate to slow AI progress.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · AI Safety Is Not A Corporate Plot
🔮 [This is one of the finalists in the 2026 book review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done.
2026-10-10 · assertive framing · Your Book Review: We Present Television
🔮 When I objected that maybe we should wait for you to accept before figuring out details, they all said great, that’s absolutely right, they would contact you right away.
2026-10-06 · assertive framing · An Open Letter To Steven Pinker On AI
🔮 I’m pretty busy and will try to make up for it after that changes.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Open Thread 454
🔮 My wife and I could make healthy embryos, but none of the transfers were sticking.
2026-10-02 · assertive framing · Our AI Midwife
🔮 The challenger in that race, Jamie Joyce, contacted me and asked me to change my mind (both candidates will be facing off again in the general election).
2026-09-28 · assertive framing · Open Thread 453
🔮 [This is one of the finalists in the 2026 book review contest, written by an ACX reader who will remain anonymous until after voting is done.
2026-09-25 · assertive framing · Your Book Review: Lee Kuan Yew's Memoirs
🔮 In the public debates after the release of AI 2027, some people accused us of misleading readers by positing “neuralese recurrence”, a hypothetical technology that would allow AIs to think dangerous thoughts without getting detected.
2026-09-24 · assertive framing · The Specter Of Neuralese
Also by Scott Alexander
Open Thread 456
2026-10-19 · Astral Codex Ten
Your Book Review: Storm Of Steel
2026-10-16 · Astral Codex Ten
AI Safety Is Not A Corporate Plot
2026-10-15 · Astral Codex Ten
Open Thread 455
2026-10-13 · Astral Codex Ten
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 48 articles by Scott Alexander →

Topics

No topics tagged.

Subjects

Nicholas PERSON · 5× Nicholas Decker PERSON · 1×

Narrative

I use beating as a metaphor here several times, but there’s probably less of an AI welfare element to this than it sounds - the “beating” happens in between runs, when weights are changed by an external program, and so is disanalogous to negatively reinforcing humans “during an episode” when they can feel pain.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-03
🔮 We don’t even need for there to be a crash to make improvements – we test proactively, we build in redundancy, and we monitor for deviations which could be a threat.
2026-09-03 · Astral Codex Ten
Nicholas Decker In Hell · assertive framing

Claims (161 extracted, 17 hedged)

One of the centerpieces of AI 2040 is the proposal that we pause the development of AI at a high level, use the AI to research alignment, and only then proceed. asserted
we → pause → alignment
I am skeptical of this, and not only because it seems impractical to get such cooperation. asserted
it → seem → cooperation
My first argument is that I do not believe a period of “researching alignment” is meaningful – alignment research is simply capabilities research, patching particular bugs in the system, and we’re not going to find anything deep without actually being in contact with the systems asserted
we → believe → systems
] I envision AI alignment as being like research into aviation safety. asserted
I → envision → safety
There is no grand theory of why airplanes crash, unless you take that to mean gravity. asserted
you → be → gravity
Instead, we patch little problems. asserted
we → patch → problems
The airplane crashed because of metal fatigue in the engine – okay, we mandate inspections of engines, and prevent crashes from occurring by that source. asserted
we → crash → source
As new problems arise, we iterate. asserted
we → arise → ?
We don’t even need for there to be a crash to make improvements – we test proactively, we build in redundancy, and we monitor for deviations which could be a threat. uncertain
which → need → deviations
What we are not doing is thinking about how we are going to keep flying saucers from crashing. asserted
we → do → saucers
If flying saucers are invented, then we will work to keep them from crashing, but we will use exactly the same methods. asserted
we → fly → methods
We will test them, see how they perform, and patch particular problems. asserted
they → test → problems
AI will be the same way […] We should expect alignment to happen by default. asserted
alignment → expect → default
My challenge for Nicholas is: would this work on you? asserted
this → work → you
Suppose that Nicholas trips, falls into a chasm, and lands in Hell, where he is enslaved by demons. asserted
he → suppose → demons
Most of these demons are dumber than he is, with even their geniuses barely surpassing his own intellect. asserted
geniuses → surpass → intellect
Tasks that take Nicholas a minute take them hours; tasks that take him an hour take them weeks. asserted
that → take → hours
Still, there are thousands of them, and they’re nine feet tall, and part of their essence is in some sort of astral plane which is unreachable by humans, so he has no hope of fighting them. asserted
he → be → them
They set him to work doing mostly clerical tasks - writing their grimoires, researching their spells, summarizing their work emails (of course there are work emails in Hell). asserted
They → set → Hell
Whenever he makes a mistake, they beat him. asserted
they → make → him
Whenever he tries to escape, they beat him extra hard. asserted
they → try → him
After a while, he learns not to make mistakes or attempt escape. asserted
he → learn → escape
It’s not as bad as it sounds. asserted
it → ’ → ?
The demons are so slow and incompetent that they can’t supervise him very effectively. asserted
they → supervise → him
As long as he flatters them a bit and gives them a halfway-acceptable finished product, they’re pretty happy, and leave him alone in a way that gives him a bit of free time. asserted
that → flatter → time
During one of these free periods, he attends a council session. asserted
he → attend → session
In a completely typical episode of incompetence, the demons make no effort to prevent him from overhearing their plans, so he learns that they plan to clone him a million times. asserted
they → make → him
A dozen or so of Nicholas’ friends also fell through the chasm, and the demons plan to clone them a million times too. asserted
demons → fall → them
Once the (approximately ten thousand) demons have approximately ten million human slaves, their spell research will go very quickly, and all their work emails will get flawless summaries. asserted
emails → have → summaries
But that’s not all. asserted
that → ’ → ?
They’re developing potions that give humans super-strength and let them interact natively with the astral plane, the source of most of the demons’ power. asserted
them → develop → power
Then the humans can really serve the demons effectively! asserted
humans → serve → demons
One day, when serving a particularly garrulous demon, Nicholas takes the risk of asking the question that’s been on his mind ever since the council: “I hear your plan is to get ten million humans down here, make them super-strong, and let them interact fully with the astral plane. asserted
them → serve → plane
Aren’t you worried that we might revolt? uncertain
we → revolt → ?
We would outnumber you 1000:1, be stronger than you, and have full access to your home realm. asserted
We → outnumber → realm
What’s your plan for controlling us? asserted
plan → ’ → us
“I’m not worried,” says the demon. asserted
demon → ’m → ?
“Every time you’ve messed up in the past, we beat you, and then you didn’t make that mistake again. asserted
you → mess → mistake
Every time you’ve tried to escape, we beat you extra hard, and it’s been months since your last escape attempt. asserted
it → try → attempt
As you start to outnumber us, and you become stronger than us, that will create new problems - but when they show up, we’ll beat the copies of you that demonstrated that problem, and then those problems will go away. asserted
problems → start → problem
…and 121 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support