When You Control the Mail, You Control the Nation

The Bulwark · collected 2026-09-03 · by Andrew Egger commentary
Read the original at The Bulwark ↗

Summary

Pollster Rich Baris warns that Republicans may lose coalition support unless they distance themselves from Donald Trump's policies. A Big Data Poll Director, Baris notes that voters are turned off by Trump's focus on foreign policy, particularly the war in Iran. According to some pollsters, even loyal MAGA supporters are starting to sound alarms about Trump's impact on Republican chances. Trump is reportedly spending heavily on national ads rather than supporting specific local candidates.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-03, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
76
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
8%
6 of 76 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
expected in commentary, which argues a position
Publisher trust
not scored
Commentary is not rated for newsroom trust
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-03 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

In a recent interview, Big Data Poll Director Rich Baris expressed concerns that the Republican party may struggle in upcoming midterms due to President Trump's unpopularity and foreign policy decisions, specifically the war in Iran. Baris stated that many of Trump's voters are unhappy with his handling of international issues, including a surge in inflation associated with the conflict. This sentiment is causing tension among Republicans, who face a tough midterm election landscape despite controlling the presidency.

Written for “Mail-in Voting Controversy” on 2026-09-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.55 Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning score -0.55 for article 3444 (high confidence, 4 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-03

Story

📰 Mail-in Voting Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
NBC News Top Stories
⚖️ Centre further right than this 🔴 9% hedged 1 of 11 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A appears to be a collection of unrelated news headlines and excerpts, while Article B discusses Trump's coalition and foreign policy”
September 2, 2026 different event · 100%
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 59
“Article A refers to events in 2024 and Trump's victory, while Article B mentions a future date (two months from midterms) and Trump's potential issues in an upcoming election”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 12% hedged 4 of 32 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles mention different individuals discussing Trump's performance as president and his impact on the midterms”

Publisher

The Bulwark · 40 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected

Commentary. The three signals behind a trust score all measure a newsroom's record with its own reporting, so they are not computed for this source. How trust is scored.

No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Andrew Egger
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 You might want to start telling them, Yeah, I’m with him—but only on the good stuff, the stuff you guys like.
2026-09-03 · assertive framing · When You Control the Mail, You Control the Nation
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Atlantic Big Data Iran Republican Republicans

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 12× Republicans NORP · 4× Senate ORG · 3× Texas GPE · 3× Donald Trump PERSON · 2× Baris PERSON · 1× Big Data ORG · 1× Iran GPE · 1× Rich Baris PERSON · 1× Tim Miller PERSON · 1×

Narrative

“For example, if a state election official brings a batch of 10,000 ballots to USPS and USPS is unable to match just one of those ballots against the Portal—because, for example, someone has recently changed their name after marriage or they’ve moved—then USPS would refuse to mail the remaining 9,999 ballots as well.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-03
🔮 You might want to start telling them, Yeah, I’m with him—but only on the good stuff, the stuff you guys like.
2026-09-03 · The Bulwark
When You Control the Mail, You Control the Nation · assertive framing

Claims (76 extracted, 6 hedged)

Even some dyed-in-the-wool MAGA pollsters are starting to sound the red alert. asserted
pollsters → start → alert
“Republicans are going to run out of a coalition soon if they don’t build on what he started to build in ’24,” Big Data Poll Director Rich Baris told Tim Miller in an interview yesterday. asserted
Baris → go → interview
“And a lot of those gains are squandered because of the direction they took.” asserted
they → squander → direction
In the eyes of some of his voters, Baris argued, Trump’s biggest sin has been his foreign-policy obsession: An inflation-spiking war in Iran wasn’t what the president promised, and it certainly wasn’t what they expected from him. asserted
they → argue → him
Say you’re a Republican lawmaker going into a tough midterm fight. asserted
you → say → fight
The good news is your party controls the presidency. asserted
party → control → presidency
The bad news is the president is insanely unpopular and getting more so every day. asserted
president → get → ?
Many voters you need are pretty mad at the guy. asserted
you → need → guy
You might want to start telling them, Yeah, I’m with him—but only on the good stuff, the stuff you guys like. uncertain
guys → want → stuff
As I wrote last week, this was never going to be an option for Republicans this cycle. asserted
this → write → Republicans
They’re tied too tightly to Donald Trump in voters’ minds already, and he’d rather see them lose than win at his expense. asserted
them → tie → expense
Even so, as the midterms get closer, I’m genuinely astonished by just how hard Trump is working to tie himself like a millstone around each vulnerable incumbent’s neck. asserted
Trump → get → neck
Last week, the Atlantic reported that Trump had settled on a specific spending strategy ahead of the midterms. asserted
Trump → report → midterms
Rejecting the idea that he should go local, using his massive war chest to help bolster the reputations of specific candidates in key races, the president is opting for a different approach: spending heavily on national ads intended to keep the spotlight on himself. asserted
president → reject → himself
Yesterday, his political operation unveiled the first tranche of those ads. asserted
operation → unveil → ads
The first, called “Toughest Guy,” aims to convince the public that Trump is a really tough guy. asserted
Trump → call → public
Another ad focuses on Trump’s most broadly palatable accomplishments: “We gave you no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, and no tax on Social Security, the largest tax cuts in American history,” Trump intones. asserted
Trump → focus → history
The price of eggs, he notes, is down, too. asserted
he → note → eggs
Congressional Republicans, never mentioned in the ads, are reduced to an implicit enabling role: They’ve occasionally helped Trump get his priorities over the finish line, and they’ll be needed to help Trump “finish the job.” asserted
Trump → mention → job
The same Maximum Trump spirit promises to be on full display at next week’s GOP midterm convention in Dallas, a two-day affair that will be anchored by back-to-back primetime speeches from Vice President JD Vance and Trump himself. asserted
that → promise → Vance
There’s a reason the major parties haven’t traditionally held midterm conventions: Without a presidential contest hanging over every race in the country, it doesn’t make sense to try to build a one-size-fits-all national narrative for hundreds of disparate and unique state and federal contests. asserted
size → ’ → contests
Unless, of course, you’re the kind of president who thinks the only way anyone in your party can win is by their voters closing their eyes and pretending they’re voting for you. asserted
they → ’re → you
It isn’t just that House and Senate Republicans have become inseparable from the president in voters’ minds. asserted
Republicans → become → minds
They’re also beholden to whatever mercurial decisions he decides to make about his gigantic bag of cash. asserted
he → ’re → cash
Last Sunday, Sen. John Kennedy took to Fox News to basically plead with Trump to open his wallet in support of the party’s damaged-goods Senate nominee in Texas, Ken Paxton: “We in the Senate don’t have the money budgeted for Texas. asserted
money → take → Texas
We need help from the president,” Kennedy said. asserted
Kennedy → need → president
“The president says he has $850 million in his campaign accounts. asserted
he → say → accounts
That’s a lot of jack. . . . asserted
That → ’ → jack
But he hasn’t committed to it yet.” asserted
he → commit → it
Majority Leader John Thune made the same point on Fox on Tuesday: “Because Texas is such a big state, we’re going to need the president and his team to be engaged there and putting resources into that race.” asserted
president → make → race
It would be easy to laugh all this off as just desserts for venal Senate Republicans and the latest demonstration of the president’s incredible vanity. asserted
It → laugh → vanity
There’s a part of Trump that seems genuinely to believe that, when voters are reminded of his accomplishments, they’ll rush back into his arms. asserted
they → ’ → arms
It’s exactly the sort of hubris that seems likely to lead the GOP straight into a catastrophe. asserted
that → ’ → catastrophe
But we can’t lose sight of the other side of the equation. asserted
we → lose → equation
Trump isn’t only relying on highly dubious methods of persuasion to carry his people through the midterms. asserted
Trump → rely → midterms
It’s increasingly clear that he wants to try to cheat his way to victory, too. asserted
he → ’ → victory
We’ve been writing a lot about Trump’s attempt to seize federal control of mail-in ballots by giving the Postal Service an unprecedented new role of policing which mailed ballots should and shouldn’t be delivered. asserted
ballots → write → role
This week, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) sent a letter to Postmaster General David Steiner, seeking information about alarming allegations he had received from a USPS whistleblower about that effort. asserted
he → send → effort
The software the USPS was building to handle these tasks, the whistleblower alleged, was “astonishingly untested,” rushed, and buggy. asserted
whistleblower → build → tasks
And even if it miraculously worked as intended, the procedures USPS was building around it seemed almost guaranteed to disenfranchise legitimate voters. asserted
USPS → work → voters
…and 36 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support