Trump, the midterm elections, Congress, and the war

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-25 · by Byron York

Quick Summary

This article draws parallels between President George W. Bush's approach to the Iraq War and President Donald Trump’s handling of military action against Iran. In 2002, Bush secured congressional approval for entering Iraq with bipartisan support, while Trump launched military operations in January without seeking formal authorization from Congress or widely communicating the rationale behind the actions. Public opinion shifted rapidly against the war in both cases; however, opposition to Trump's war effort has grown more quickly due to his lack of explanation and public engagement compared to Bush’s initial broad support before the tide turned.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-25, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In the run-up to the 2002 Iraq War, President George W. Bush secured congressional approval by securing votes in both the House and Senate for an Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF). On October 10, 2002, the House approved the AUMF with a vote of 296 to 133, including support from 81 Democrats. The following day, the Senate also passed it by a vote of 77 to 23, with 29 Democrats supporting the measure. Initially, Bush’s pre-war consultations with Congress shielded him from political backlash when the war turned sour. However, as the conflict worsened, these votes no longer provided him immunity. The article highlights how President Trump did not clearly explain the necessity or goals of the Iraq War to the public and instead announced the start of hostilities without extensive congressional engagement. This contrast is now being used by Democratic candidates like Abdul el-Sayed in Michigan during the 2022 midterm elections, criticizing the war's impact on American lives and economy.

Written for “US Midterm Elections” on 2026-10-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
42
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
7%
3 of 42 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Correction & hedging signals
72.3
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

Story

📰 US Midterm Elections
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 1907 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)
2026-10-03
Tennessee’s prison chief resigns after failed Christa Pike execution, Bill Lee says
2026-10-03
Alito says there’s no perfect time to retire while confirming he will reconsider next year
2026-10-01
Christa Pike was set to be the first woman to be executed in Tennessee in 200 years before botched attempts: What to know

Who wrote this

Byron York
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The current situation could send long-term trends in North Carolina in a new direction.
2026-09-29 · assertive framing · The Senate seat most likely to flip
🔮 Yes, Republicans are very likely going to lose, but maybe not by the blue wave, or even blue tsunami, that some are talking about.
2026-09-28 · assertive framing · Are GOP doomers overreacting?
🔮 Trump did almost nothing to clearly explain to the American public why the war was necessary and what its goals would be, instead announcing the beginning of hostilities in an overnight video.
2026-09-25 · assertive framing · Trump, the midterm elections, Congress, and the war
🔮 And you may not pump diesel, but diesel pumps you, and the way that diesel pumps you is that you’ve got to pay for the price of everything that gets shipped to the places that you buy it in.
2026-09-22 · assertive framing · How do Republicans deal with el Sayed?
🔮 if I were president and the poverty rate dropped to the LOWEST RATE ON RECORD, I might make a big deal out of it — a lot bigger deal than the Trump White House is making,” commentator Mickey Kaus, who has been covering poverty and social policy for decades, remarked on Wednesday.
2026-09-17 · assertive framing · Trump, good economic news, and the midterm elections
Also by Byron York
The Senate seat most likely to flip
2026-09-29 · Washington Examiner
Are GOP doomers overreacting?
2026-09-28 · Washington Examiner
How do Republicans deal with el Sayed?
2026-09-22 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Congress Democrats House Iraq U.S.

Subjects

Democrats NORP · 7× TRUMP PERSON · 6× Bush PERSON · 5× House ORG · 5× Iraq GPE · 5× U.S. GPE · 5× Senate ORG · 4× Congress ORG · 3× Republicans NORP · 3× American NORP · 2×

Narrative

“We’re getting hit at the gas pump to go buy our groceries and then we’re getting hit at the grocery store for the groceries that got there — all because of an insane war that we had no business fighting in the first place,” Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul el Sayed said at a gas station news conference in Detroit this week.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 Trump did almost nothing to clearly explain to the American public why the war was necessary and what its goals would be, instead announcing the beginning of hostilities in an overnight video.
2026-09-25 · Washington Examiner
Trump, the midterm elections, Congress, and the war · assertive framing

Claims (42 extracted, 3 hedged)

In 2002, in the run-up to the war in Iraq, President George W. Bush went through a long and elaborate process to secure the approval of Congress for going to war. asserted
Bush → go → war
On Oct. 10, 2002, the House passed an Authorization for the Use of Military Force by a vote of 296 to 133; the total in favor of going to war included 81 Democrats. asserted
total → pass → Democrats
The next day, Oct. 11, the Senate voted to authorize the war by a vote of 77 to 23. asserted
Senate → vote → 77
Support for the authorization included 29 Democrats. asserted
Support → include → Democrats
When the war went badly — Bush later wrote that “The reality was that I had sent American troops into combat based in large part on intelligence that proved false” — Bush was for a while protected from congressional backlash because he had taken the time to enlist lawmakers’ support for going to war in the first place. asserted
he → go → place
Later, when the war went very, very badly, the authorizing votes no longer offered Bush any political protection. asserted
votes → go → protection
(They also bedeviled prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton for years.) asserted
They → bedevil → years
But it was not until 2005 that Congress passed a measure that even asked the Bush administration to finish up the war, and it was not until 2007 that both the House and Senate passed a war funding bill that included a mandatory timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. asserted
that → pass → Iraq
Bush vetoed it, and later got war funding without the withdrawal provisions. asserted
Bush → veto → provisions
Meanwhile, public support for the war plunged. asserted
support → plunge → war
According to Gallup, 72% of Americans supported the war when it began in March 2003. uncertain
it → accord → March
By November 2004, it stood at 48%. asserted
it → stand → %
You know where this is going. asserted
this → know → ?
But before comparing some of the politics of the Iraq war with the current war in Iran, it’s important to point out some enormous differences. asserted
it → compare → differences
Bush sent about 150,000 U.S. troops to Iraq, and another 100,000 were in the region during the war. asserted
100,000 → send → war
A total of 4,492 U.S. service members died in the war, and 32,292 were wounded. asserted
32,292 → die → war
President Donald Trump has not sent U.S. ground troops to Iraq, choosing to conduct the war by air power. asserted
Trump → send → power
Although there is some controversy about the exact figures, 19 U.S. service members have died, while more than 800 have been wounded. asserted
800 → be → figures
Still, because of the way Trump chose to begin the war, the political and public opposition have risen much more quickly than in the case of Iraq. asserted
opposition → choose → Iraq
Trump did almost nothing to clearly explain to the American public why the war was necessary and what its goals would be, instead announcing the beginning of hostilities in an overnight video. asserted
goals → do → video
Now, nearly seven months into the war, about 33% of Americans support the war, while about 59% oppose it. asserted
% → support → it
(The numbers come from polling aggregator Nate Silver.) asserted
numbers → come → Silver
On the related question of Trump’s handling of the war, the RealClearPolitics average of polls shows 32.6% approve while 62.5% disapprove. asserted
% → show → polls
Trump also did not seek to enlist the support of Congress before starting the war. asserted
Trump → seek → war
As a consequence, both the House and Senate have already passed resolutions opposing the war. asserted
House → pass → war
They’re just resolutions, and they don’t force Trump to do anything, but they do show majorities in both chambers willing to go on the record opposing the war. The House passed an anti-war resolution in June, another one in July, and one last week. asserted
House → force → July
No House Democrats voted in favor of the war; between four and seven Republicans voted with Democrats against the war. asserted
Republicans → vote → war
The Senate passed an anti-war resolution in June. asserted
Senate → pass → June
Four Republicans joined Democrats in opposing the war; one Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA), joined Republicans in supporting the war. asserted
Democrat → join → war
Of course, elections are coming up in less than six weeks. asserted
elections → come → weeks
It’s unclear how much of a factor the war will be. uncertain
war → ’ → factor
We know that voters of all stripes cite the cost of living and other economic issues as their most important issue by far. asserted
voters → know → issue
But we also know that Democrats are intensely against the war, and a majority of independents oppose it, too. asserted
majority → know → it
Plus, we know that while many Republicans support the war, they are, like Democrats and independents, very unhappy with the higher prices of gas, diesel, and shipping, as well as related products, like fertilizer, that the war has brought. asserted
war → know → that
Democrats are furiously framing higher prices as the result of Trump’s war. asserted
Democrats → frame → war
“We’re getting hit at the gas pump to go buy our groceries and then we’re getting hit at the grocery store for the groceries that got there — all because of an insane war that we had no business fighting in the first place,” Michigan Democratic Senate candidate Abdul el Sayed said at a gas station news conference in Detroit this week. asserted
Sayed → hit → Detroit
The administration knows full well what a mess it is in. asserted
it → know → mess
On Fox News’s Special Report Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noted that “core inflation,” that is, the inflation rate not counting the volatile factors of food and energy, is down to what the Federal Reserve deems an acceptable level. asserted
Reserve → note → what
“Once we’re on the other side of this energy supply shock,” Bessent said, “I actually believe, along with [President Trump], that oil prices will be much lower, because we’ve seen a tremendous amount of supply come on, just in this year.” asserted
amount → ’re → year
Trump has said several times that higher gas costs are “a very inexpensive price to pay” for achieving the war’s goal of keeping Iran from building a nuclear weapon. asserted
costs → say → weapon
…and 2 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support