Getting Rid of Flock Isn't Enough To Solve America's Surveillance Problem

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Billings, A. (2026, August 28). Getting Rid of Flock Isn't Enough To Solve America's Surveillance Problem. Reason. https://reason.com/2026/08/27/getting-rid-of-flock-isnt-enough-to-solve-americas-surveillance-problem/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-08-28 · by Autumn Billings

Quick Summary

Privacy advocates are warning that while public backlash against Flock Safety, a leading provider of automatic license plate reader (ALPR) cameras, is justified, it may be too focused on one company. Flock's 120,000 cameras across 49 states capture over 20 billion license plate scans every month and work with over 5,000 law enforcement agencies. However, the article notes that Flock's competitors, such as Motorola Solutions, are expanding their offerings and have more lenient policies regarding data retention, with no default retention period for Motorola. Jay Stanley of the ACLU argues that strong legal protections are needed to prevent abuse of this surveillance technology, regardless of who provides it.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

Benn Jordan, a YouTube host, wanted to attend the Flock Safety convention in Atlanta to investigate the company's relationship with law enforcement. However, after discovering that Flock had canceled his ticket and was trying to keep him out, he decided to set up radio equipment and a drone outside the convention center to unmask attendees and even listen to microphones inside. Jordan's actions were in response to Flock's claims that police customers don't need a warrant to track drivers with its automated license plate reading cameras because drivers have "no reasonable expectation of privacy" on public roads.

Flock Safety has 120,000 cameras across 49 states and works with over 5,000 law enforcement agencies, capturing more than 20 billion license plate scans every month. The company's CEO, Garrett Langley, appeared on Fox News to plead for a national "compromise" to save the company from efforts to ban its technology outright.

Meanwhile, some law enforcement agencies are asking Axon to redesign their automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) to look different from Flock cameras due to widespread vandalism of Flock's devices. Axon has reported that some towns and cities are switching from Flock to Axon's cameras after discovering abuses of access to stalk ex-spouses, among other concerns.

The controversy surrounding Flock Safety highlights the need for strong legal protections against mass surveillance technology, rather than simply banning a single company or product.

Written for “Flock Camera Controversy” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 4 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Flock Camera Controversy
Crime & Law · 5 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 29% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 43 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles describe the same police convention in Atlanta where Flock Safety was being protested by Benn Jordan and others, although from different perspectives”
Reason
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 16% hedged 32 of 203 📰 publisher trust 94
“Both articles mention Flock Safety, public backlash against their surveillance technology, and a warning from police departments about revealing sensitive information with car stickers.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 23 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article B specifically mentions a 'public backlash' and 'contract cancellations', which are not mentioned in Article A, suggesting they cover related but separate events”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this 🔴 15% hedged 4 of 27 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A discusses a historical precedent from 2020 and warns about state tyranny, while Article B describes current backlash against Flock Safety's technology in 2026”
Brickbat: What the Flock different event · 80%
Reason
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 4 📰 publisher trust 94
“Article A describes a high-risk traffic stop based on outdated information from Flock Safety, while Article B discusses the public backlash and contract cancellations against Flock Safety in general”
404 Media
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 7% hedged 3 of 43 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a specific sting operation where a man was charged with felonies for destroying a 3D-printed decoy camera, while Article B discusses the backlash against Flock Safety and their surveillance technology in general”
404 Media
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 7 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A describes a specific incident involving a police officer making a fake Flock camera, while Article B discusses the public backlash and contract cancellations against Flock Safety, but does not mention the specific incident”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
29%
7 of 24 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
94/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
5
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 43 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Autumn Billings
6 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If Americans had no reasonable expectation of privacy while in public, police officers wouldn't have these restrictions on their authority.
🔮 "But I could not see the damage they were describing," she continued.
2026-09-25 · assertive framing · Banning Flock Won't Be Enough Without Police Reform
🔮 Such "events may have contributed to motor vehicle theft rising and falling at different times in different places," writes West, further complicating whether ALPR cameras did, in fact, cause favorable changes in the data.
🔮 But at the end of the otherwise normal appointment, she was told she couldn't leave.
🔮 Venegas was working early on May 21, 2025, laying the foundation for a new home in Foley, Alabama, southeast of Mobile, when he saw "five armed men in camouflage" jump the property line fence and run toward the construction workers, according to his complaint filed in the Southern District of Alabama.
🔮 But while many privacy advocates may relish seeing Flock on the run, civil liberties experts warn against losing sight of what truly matters: passing strong legal protections that outlive Flock's dominance.
Also by Autumn Billings
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 6 articles by Autumn Billings →

Topics

Flock Flock Safety ICE Motorola Taser

Subjects

Flock ORG · 13× Motorola ORG · 6× Axon ORG · 5× Stanley PERSON · 4× ICE ORG · 3× Flock Safety ORG · 1× Fox News ORG · 1× Garrett Langley PERSON · 1× Jay Stanley PERSON · 1× the American Civil Liberties Union's ORG · 1×

Narrative

Amid mounting contract cancellations and anti-Flock vigilantes targeting automatic license plate reader (ALPR) cameras across the country, CEO Garrett Langley appeared on Fox News earlier this week beseeching a national "compromise" to save the company from efforts to ban the technology outright.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-28
🔮 But while many privacy advocates may relish seeing Flock on the run, civil liberties experts warn against losing sight of what truly matters: passing strong legal protections that outlive Flock's dominance.

Claims (24 extracted, 7 hedged)

Flock Safety is feeling the heat from ongoing public backlash against the company's controversial surveillance technology. asserted
Safety → feel → technology
Amid mounting contract cancellations and anti-Flock vigilantes targeting automatic license plate reader (ALPR) cameras across the country, CEO Garrett Langley appeared on Fox News earlier this week beseeching a national "compromise" to save the company from efforts to ban the technology outright. asserted
Langley → mount → technology
But while many privacy advocates may relish seeing Flock on the run, civil liberties experts warn against losing sight of what truly matters: passing strong legal protections that outlive Flock's dominance. uncertain
that → relish → dominance
The attention on Flock is certainly justified. asserted
attention → justify → Flock
As the largest provider of ALPRs, Flock has 120,000 cameras across 49 states, works with over 5,000 law enforcement agencies, and captures more than 20 billion license plate scans every month. asserted
Flock → have → scans
And while the company bears the brunt of the public's animosity, competitors are watching, learning, and waiting, ready to swoop in on whatever infrastructure Flock leaves behind after the public-relations shitstorm passes. asserted
shitstorm → bear → infrastructure
And whatever comes after could potentially be even worse, unless government actors start taking privacy rights seriously, according to Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst at the American Civil Liberties Union's (ACLU) Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. uncertain
actors → come → Project
Motorola Solutions, currently Flock's "most significant" competitor, "has been expanding its police technology offerings through an aggressive acquisition strategy in recent years," writes Stanley in a new analysis published on Tuesday. asserted
Stanley → expand → Tuesday
And through the company's nationwide Digital Recognition Network, over 500 million monthly plate scans are made available to participating law enforcement agencies. asserted
scans → make → agencies
But unlike Flock, which has responded to criticism by adjusting its controversial 30-day default retention policy down to seven days and introducing limits on police access to data, Motorola has made no such changes. asserted
Motorola → respond → changes
Instead, Motorola has no default retention period and imposes no enforced limits on how long customers, including law enforcement, can retain ALPR data. asserted
customers → have → data
(Flock enforces a maximum one-year retention policy.) asserted
Flock → enforce → policy
For example, the New York Police Department retains data from Motorola's ALPRs for a whopping five years, according to Stanley. uncertain
Department → retain → Stanley
Such long retention periods of law-abiding citizens' location data are concerning given the risk of misuse and mission creep. asserted
periods → abide → misuse
Indeed, Motorola has contracted with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) since at least 2018, and in September 2023 was "awarded a $15.6 million contract…to 'implement and maintain' ICE's tactical communication infrastructure," according to Forbes, giving ICE direct access to Motorola's surveillance database. uncertain
Motorola → contract → database
Another one of Flock's competitors, Axon, is also gunning for a top police surveillance position. asserted
one → gun → position
Formerly known as Taser, the company got its start with the TASER energy weapon and has since grown its police offerings to include body-worn cameras and digital evidence management software. asserted
company → know → cameras
The company's newest products include ALPR services, which it began selling through dashboard and in-car camera products in 2021 and fixed-cameras in 2025, according to Stanley. uncertain
it → include → Stanley
Since "many Flock customers already have contracts with Axon for body cameras and other products," argues Stanley, switching from Flock to Axon may be an easy and attractive option for government officials during this time of anti-Flock fervor. uncertain
switching → have → fervor
Even though Axon, unlike Flock and Motorola, doesn't offer nationwide data sharing, the company's policies on handling ALPR data still fall short of protecting privacy. asserted
policies → offer → privacy
From long data retention periods to the experimental use of AI analytics, whatever Axon and many other surveillance competitors' policies and capabilities may look like now, they simply can't be trusted to protect civil liberties over the long term. uncertain
they → look → term
"Communities should not gain too much comfort from what companies are and are not doing right now, but instead keep their eye on the longer game by putting protections into law," writes Stanley. asserted
Stanley → gain → law
Whether a community chooses to use ALPR surveillance or not, Stanley recommends a handful of legal protections, including a retention period of no more than 48 hours, disallowing nationwide data sharing, storing data locally, and declining AI analytics software. asserted
Stanley → choose → software
Mandating such policies—along with requiring police to obtain a warrant before searching ALPR data—can help ensure Americans' civil liberties remain proactively protected no matter which surveillance technology company dominates. asserted
company → mandate → data
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support