American amnesia: What we’ve forgotten in the 25 years since the 9/11 terrorist attacks

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-08-28 · by Hugo Gurdon
Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗

Summary

This article is an opinion piece reflecting on the 25-year anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The author shares their personal experience of hearing about the attacks while driving to work in Toronto and notes how the event marked a profound shift in global politics and emotions, creating a sense of shared trauma and solidarity among nations. The article cites an emotional response from world leaders and citizens alike, with many expressing "genuine sympathy for America" and a desire to stand with the US against terrorism. The author also mentions significant personal losses and responses to the attacks, including the enlistment of young men in the armed forces.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
95
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
6%
6 of 95 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
96.4
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
3
World
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-08-28 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

As September 11th marks its anniversary, it's clear that 25 years have passed since the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center. For those who lived through it, like author Evan Fallor, the day was a turning point that divided their lives into "before" and "after." Fallor recalls being gathered in his homeroom class when the principal's aide delivered news of a plane crashing into one of the Twin Towers. The attacks had a profound impact on American society, leading to increased security measures and changes in daily life. However, it seems that some Americans are forgetting the significance of 9/11. As author Hugo Gurdon notes, it was one of those cataclysmic events that marks one's mind indelibly and creates a permanent refraction from before to after. Despite its importance, there is a sense of amnesia about what happened on 9/11, with some people forgetting the magnitude of the attacks or their aftermath. In fact, author David Harsanyi notes that some politicians are downplaying the significance of the attacks and even blaming the US for creating terrorism.

Written for “Remembering and Forgetting 9/11” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.85 Confidence high
Leaning score +0.85 for article 3082 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-08-28

Story

📰 Remembering and Forgetting 9/11
World · 3 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Latest & Breaking News on Fox News
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 31 📰 publisher trust 93
“Both articles describe the same terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, from a personal perspective of individuals who were alive at that time.”
Latest & Breaking News on Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 12% hedged 5 of 41 📰 publisher trust 93
“Article B is discussing the 9/11 terrorist attacks in general, while Article A focuses on a specific exhibit at an Arab American museum in Michigan”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 8% hedged 4 of 53 📰 publisher trust 95
“Article A refers specifically to the Abbey Gate bombing on August 2021, while Article B mentions the 9/11 terrorist attacks, a separate incident”
The damage 9/11 did to our country different event · 80%
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 5% hedged 4 of 79 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A describes personal memories of 9/11, but from a location in Manhattan, while Article B mentions flying planes into the World Trade Center and being in Toronto at the time.”
Home - CBSNews.com
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 14% hedged 6 of 43 📰 publisher trust 58
“Article A describes the 9/11 terrorist attacks as an incident that occurred in the past, while Article B uses it as a reference point for current politics and scrutiny of a politician's past remarks.”

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 37 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.072 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Hugo Gurdon
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Yes, there was Article 5 of the NATO agreement, which states that an attack on one member will be treated as an attack on all members.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

9/11 America COVID Muslim Toronto

Subjects

America GPE · 3× Americans NORP · 1× British NORP · 1× Canada GPE · 1× Muslim NORP · 1× NATO ORG · 1× Osama bin Laden PERSON · 1× Pentagon ORG · 1× Toronto GPE · 1× al Qaeda ORG · 1×

Narrative

Like Sultan Mehmed II turning Constantinople’s great church, the Hagia Sofia, into a mosque in the 15th century, or the Emperor Charles V building a cathedral in the middle of a Muslim mosque in Cordoba in the 16th century, it was an assertion of a new order, in this case not yet established but intended.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-28
🔮 Yes, there was Article 5 of the NATO agreement, which states that an attack on one member will be treated as an attack on all members.

Claims (95 extracted, 6 hedged)

Anyone who was an adult 25 years ago can remember where they were when they heard news that Muslim terrorists had flown two passenger planes into the World Trade Center. asserted
terrorists → remember → Center
It was one of those cataclysmic events that marks one’s mind indelibly and creates a permanent refraction, from before to after, like B.C. and A.D., or before COVID and after COVID. asserted
that → mark → COVID
I was driving to work in Toronto that morning, listening to a news show hosted by a Vietnam War draft dodger who had fled America when his country needed him and had, in the decades since, achieved a degree of media stardom in Canada. asserted
country → drive → Canada
If I recall correctly, he speculated, reasonably enough in those earliest seconds of the all-consuming news cycle, that a small plane carrying tourists to see the skyscrapers close up had met with disaster. asserted
skyscrapers → recall → disaster
Shortly after I reached the office, the second plane hit. asserted
plane → reach → office
Reporters and editors who had been watching on TV as the first tower belched smoke into the blue sky, gasped in shock and horror when the second plane flashed across the screen and exploded in a ball of flame before a live worldwide audience. asserted
plane → watch → audience
Global revulsion at the attack was instantaneous, and there was an emotional understanding among people everywhere, particularly in the West, that this was an act of war against our civilization. asserted
this → be → civilization
Yes, there was Article 5 of the NATO agreement, which states that an attack on one member will be treated as an attack on all members. asserted
attack → be → members
Foreign leaders and pundits declared, “We are all Americans.” asserted
We → declare → ?
Some dissenting voices took the side of our enemies, and there were one or two utterly cynical responses, such as that of a British civil servant who advised colleagues to release any bad news while the world was distracted by the enormity perpetrated by Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. asserted
world → dissent → Laden
Mostly, however, and overwhelmingly, there was a sense of reeling disbelief combined with genuine sympathy for America, and a nearly universal understanding that a great evil was abroad in the world. asserted
evil → be → world
Like so many others, I lost a friend murdered that day; she was on the plane that the hijackers smashed into the Pentagon. asserted
hijackers → lose → Pentagon
Men and women stopped what they were doing, collected their children early from school, and rearranged their lives long term. asserted
they → stop → lives
Men and women quit their jobs to do whatever they could to help. uncertain
they → quit → whatever
Young men abandoned their careers to join the armed forces, stand with their country, and go to war with the newly declared and terrible enemy. asserted
men → abandon → enemy
President George W. Bush stirred and emboldened the nation when he stood on the apocalyptic rubble of southern Manhattan and told workers doing the grim work of retrieving bodies, “I can hear you. … asserted
I → stir → you
The rest of the world hears you … and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon.” asserted
who → hear → us
It was a rallying cry for just retribution and seemed also to contain a new clear-sightedness. asserted
It → seem → sightedness
In the aftermath of the attack, watching the national and international reaction, I wrote that the passion released on 9/11 might bring epochal change and initiate a new age of revived American patriotism, a restoration of understanding in the West that some cultures are better than others, and ours is worth fighting for. uncertain
ours → watch → others
I expressed hope and some confidence that, galvanized by the atrocity just visited upon it, our society would get up off its knees, end its cultural cringe, and finally see that tolerance of cultural difference should not be allowed to slump into self-abasement and retreat. asserted
tolerance → express → abasement
The resurgence of patriotism did not last. asserted
resurgence → last → patriotism
Bush himself stressed that the murder of 3,000 people should not taint America’s view of Muslims. asserted
murder → stress → Muslims
As we went to war in Afghanistan, the Left found its voice and, furrowing its brow, suggested that the most important thing was to avoid “Islamophobia.” uncertain
thing → go → Islamophobia
Its adherents recovered their composure after the patriotic setback and started wearing badges declaring, “War is not the answer.” asserted
War → recover → badges
(That depends on the question. asserted
That → depend → question
If it is “how can we make sure America defeats its foes?” then war may be very much the answer). uncertain
war → make → foes
As our armed forces went into action on foreign battlefields, skeptics and naysayers lectured us on the home front that we must not act or think ill of Islam. asserted
we → go → Islam
“Islamophobia” was then, and today remains, a lie. asserted
Islamophobia → remain → ?
It is a term intended to denigrate as bigots those who rationally dislike Muslim culture, values, and deadly aggression. asserted
who → intend → culture
It attempts to reframe a reasonable antipathy as gut prejudice that should be shunned by civilized people. asserted
that → attempt → people
Thus began a process, still with us today, by which America’s enemies, foreign and domestic, seek to shut down discussion of the obvious problems that Islam poses to the way of life and security of the West. asserted
Islam → begin → West
Some months after 9/11, my newspaper was approached by the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which was unhappy with what we’d write about Islam’s incompatibility with the preservation of the West as we know it. asserted
we → approach → it
The organization did not like our advocacy of military action against jihadis. asserted
organization → like → jihadis
It objected to our labeling the killers and devotees of their creed as “Islamofascists.” asserted
our → object → Islamofascists
Just this month, prosecutor Lara Burns testified to Congress about evidence from a 1993 wiretap in which members of the Palestine Committee, a body which, naturally, was established by the United Nations, discussed their Islamist conspiracy against the West. asserted
which → testify → West
Burns said it “included supporting Hamas abroad and infiltrating universities, media, and politics here in the U.S. … to begin normalizing Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood extremist ideology in American society. asserted
it → say → society
They stated, ‘War is deception’ when plotting to lie to Americans. asserted
War → state → Americans
They also noted their intent to cleanse the curriculum in K-12 schools because ‘we don’t want our children growing up surrendering to the idea of peace with Jews.’ … asserted
children → note → Jews
They agreed to continue to pursue their agenda by cloaking themselves under the cover of legitimacy. … asserted
They → agree → legitimacy
It was out of this conspiratorial meeting that CAIR was created to protect the other elements of the Hamas support network.” asserted
CAIR → create → network
…and 55 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support