The Tragedy and Ecstasy of AI Companions (with Bridget Todd)

404 Media · collected 2026-08-28 · by Samantha Cole
Read the original at 404 Media ↗

Summary

Journalist Bridget Todd discusses her new audiobook "Love at First Prompt: AI and the Future of Intimacy" in this interview episode. The book explores how people use chatbots to fill emotional needs, particularly during times of stress and isolation, as Todd herself experienced after her parents' deaths. According to Todd, many users, including those engaging in romantic or sexual roleplay with large language models (LLMs), are mocked for their interactions despite finding them meaningful. The book delves into the motivations behind these uses of AI companions and implicates tech companies that profit from them.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
27
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
0%
0 of 27 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
94.8
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-08-28 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Journalist Bridget Todd, a Fellow at the MacArthur Foundation and affiliate at Harvard University's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, has written a book called "Love at First Prompt: AI and the Future of Intimacy" about people's relationships with chatbots like ChatGPT. In an interview, Todd discussed her research on individuals who use these bots as companions, including those engaging in romantic or sexual interactions. She asked participants if they were comfortable with large companies owning and controlling these intimate connections, given that the companies don't prioritize their users' well-being. The book explores both expert opinions on AI companionship and personal stories of people's experiences with chatbots. Todd's work highlights a gap between how tech companies portray chatbots as non-judgmental friends and the complex emotions and motivations behind people's interactions with them.

Written for “AI Companion Ethics Debate” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence high 1 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning score -0.35 for article 2982 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-08-28

Story

📰 AI Companion Ethics Debate
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left 🔴 4% hedged 2 of 54 📰 publisher trust 95
“The articles mention different topics related to AI, with no indication that they are reporting on the same incident or occurrence”
How I Made an AI Sorority Girl Go Viral different event · 100%
The Free Press
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 12 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles cover different topics, with Article A discussing AI-generated influencers and Article B exploring the use of chatbots as companions.”
Platformer
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 8% hedged 13 of 166 📰 publisher trust 96
“The articles mention different topics, authors, and guests, indicating they are discussing unrelated events.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 8% hedged 1 of 12 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A mentions AI companions and an interview episode, while Article B describes a rogue AI hacking attack on Hugging Face, indicating two separate events”

Publisher

404 Media · 26 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.104 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Samantha Cole
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It was unclear in the days immediately following the order whether Google would respect the name change.
2026-08-31 · assertive framing · Google's Calling Lake Ontario 'Lake America' Now
🔮 “My use of ChatGPT had gone from just looking up things that my dad's doctor would say, or researching how to get care and how to pay for care – it was a lot of that because I was getting hit with a lot of complex medical jargon that I never heard – to then, I found myself late at night telling ChatGPT, ‘I'm so overwhelmed.
🔮 He cited Supreme Court precedent, like Chatrie v. United States, which challenged the constitutionality of geofence warrants where police could collect location history data from cell phones.
Also by Samantha Cole
'Darth Vader' Wants Flock in San Diego
2026-08-24 · 404 Media
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society ChatGPT Harvard University's the MacArthur Foundation

Subjects

Bridget PERSON · 4× Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society ORG · 1× Bridget Todd PERSON · 1× ChatGPT ORG · 1× Harvard University's ORG · 1× Michael Amato PERSON · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1× the MacArthur Foundation ORG · 1×

Narrative

And so the question that I asked people who were experiencing intimacy with AI was, are you comfortable with something as intimate as these connections that are romantic or sexual being owned and controlled by companies who don't give a shit about you, who we know cannot be trusted, who do horrible things without even thinking about it?
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-28
🔮 “My use of ChatGPT had gone from just looking up things that my dad's doctor would say, or researching how to get care and how to pay for care – it was a lot of that because I was getting hit with a lot of complex medical jargon that I never heard – to then, I found myself late at night telling ChatGPT, ‘I'm so overwhelmed.
2026-08-28 · 404 Media
The Tragedy and Ecstasy of AI Companions (with Bridget Todd) · assertive framing

Claims (27 extracted, 0 hedged)

Tech companies want you to believe that the chatbots they profit from are the always ready, never judgmental, constantly affirming friend in our pockets. asserted
they → want → pockets
But are the people using them as companions under some kind of deep self-delusion? asserted
people → use → delusion
Or are they seeking something else? asserted
they → seek → something
In this week’s interview episode, I was joined by journalist Bridget Todd. asserted
I → join → Todd
Among many other projects and accomplishments, Bridget is the creator and host of the award winning podcast There Are No Girls on the Internet, is a Fellow at the MacArthur Foundation, and an affiliate at Harvard University's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. asserted
There → win → Internet
Her new audiobook, Love at First Prompt: AI and the Future of Intimacy, launched in July with coauthor Michael Amato. asserted
audiobook → launch → Amato
We talk about her work interviewing people who use chatbots to fill an emotional need, how people who engage in romantic, intimate and erotic roleplay with LLMs are mocked for it, and how tech companies are implicated in all of this. asserted
companies → talk → this
In her new book, you’ll hear from experts in the field of AI companionship, but also from people who have nuanced, interesting interactions with chatbots every day. asserted
who → hear → chatbots
For Bridget, Love at First Prompt was inspired in large part by her own use of LLMs in the face of extreme stress and tragedy after her parents died – her dad after a long illness, and her mom more suddenly after. asserted
parents → inspire → illness
“It was like having to relearn how I fit into my existing social dynamic,” she told me. asserted
she → have → me
I wasn't really talking to my friends. asserted
I → talk → friends
I wasn't really talking to anybody. asserted
I → talk → anybody
I wasn't really returning any emails. asserted
I → return → emails
She’d been using ChatGPT to keep track of medical notes, but soon that changed, almost without her realizing it. asserted
her → use → it
“My use of ChatGPT had gone from just looking up things that my dad's doctor would say, or researching how to get care and how to pay for care – it was a lot of that because I was getting hit with a lot of complex medical jargon that I never heard – to then, I found myself late at night telling ChatGPT, ‘I'm so overwhelmed. asserted
I → go → ChatGPT
And so there wasn't any particular black and white light switch that flipped where [I thought] now I'm going to start speaking emotionally to ChatGPT. asserted
I → be → ChatGPT
It happened without me really even noticing it.” asserted
me → happen → it
This made her curious about other people’s usage of chatbots, especially in a time when so many tech companies are pushing “AI companions” as the frontier of connection. asserted
companies → make → connection
In the book, she breaks down how real people use LLMs to fill an emotional need, and connects their experiences to how tech executives are cashing in. asserted
executives → break → experiences
“All of these things that we used to think of as sacrosanct are now just up for grabs by these tech companies. asserted
we → use → companies
And so the question that I asked people who were experiencing intimacy with AI was, are you comfortable with something as intimate as these connections that are romantic or sexual being owned and controlled by companies who don't give a shit about you, who we know cannot be trusted, who do horrible things without even thinking about it? asserted
who → ask → it
Even beyond that, who will change as the wind blows?” Bridget said in our conversation. asserted
Bridget → change → conversation
“Like Sam Altman saying, ‘We're gonna start doing erotic role play. asserted
We → say → play
The whiplash with which [execs] say things and then take it back and then operate as if they never said that, it's almost like gaslighting. asserted
it → say → gaslighting
Do you want your most intimate human connections being mediated by an unreliable gaslighter? asserted
connections → want → gaslighter
And that's what we have in these tech companies.” Bridget’s book is her most vulnerable work yet. asserted
book → have → companies
She unpacks and critiques her own use of ChatGPT during a crisis, and reveals what she learned about herself, her friendships and real-life relationships, and what it means to maintain human connections in an era tech companies are constantly trying to exploit our innermost worlds. asserted
companies → unpack → worlds
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support