California lawmakers push bill to ban shock gloves for federal agents

Read the original at Los Angeles Times ↗
Cite

Buchanan, C. (2026, August 28). California lawmakers push bill to ban shock gloves for federal agents. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-08-27/california-lawmakers-push-bill-to-ban-shock-gloves-for-federal-agents

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Los Angeles Times · collected 2026-08-28 · by Christopher Buchanan

Quick Summary

California lawmakers are introducing a bill, AB 2760, to ban the use of electric shock gloves by all law enforcement in the state, including federal immigration agents. The bill follows reports that the Department of Homeland Security plans to spend up to $20 million to equip ICE agents with these gloves. Civil rights advocates have criticized the plan, saying it will allow for more intimidation and violence against immigrants. Assembly Bill 2760 would prohibit local, state, and federal agencies from possessing or using such technology in California.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-28, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

California lawmakers are introducing a bill (AB 2760) that would ban the use of electric shock gloves by all law enforcement in the state, including federal immigration agents operating in California. This comes after reports that the Department of Homeland Security plans to spend up to $20 million to equip ICE agents with the gloves, which emit an electric shock strong enough to drop a person to their knees. The bill is a response to immigrant and civil rights advocates' outcry over the use of these gloves, which they see as a threat to public safety and human rights. If passed, the law would prohibit any law enforcement agent in California from using shock gloves.

Written for “Police Use of Force Tactics” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Police Use of Force Tactics
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Centre 🔴 23% hedged 3 of 13 📰 publisher trust 68
“Article A reports on a $16.7 million contract for electric shock gloves, while Article B refers to a different reported plan to spend up to $20 million and mentions an outcry from advocates”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
20
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 20 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
95/100
Los Angeles Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Los Angeles Times · 208 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Christopher Buchanan
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Late September in the Oval Office, President Trump declared, “Iran will never have a nuclear weapon.
🔮 Recent polls have shown Democrats creeping up on or surpassing their Republican opponents as President Trump’s approval rating hovers under 40%, which may offer an opening in unexpected places.
🔮 Democrats will need to win at least four of them, while holding on to two contested seats currently held by their party, in order to flip the chamber.
🔮 - Civil rights advocates say the equipment will heighten mistrust of immigration agents who are already viewed unfavorably by a skeptical public.
🔮 “The magnitude of difference between official information from the Department of Defense and firsthand reports from the crew should be troubling, and may have serious implications about what else the Pentagon may be withholding regarding the conflict in Iran,” Roland added.
🔮 The results from Tuesday night also show that President Trump’s influence on his party’s base may be dwindling.
🔮 After an outcry from immigrant and civil rights advocates over plans to equip immigration officers with gloves capable of delivering electric shocks, California lawmakers on Thursday unveiled a bill that would ban the use of shock gloves by any law enforcement agent in the state.
🔮 - When once asked how long the U.S. and Israel could sustain its offensive in Iran, he replied, ‘It won’t be difficult.’
Also by Christopher Buchanan
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Christopher Buchanan →

Topics

AB 2760 California Compliant Technologies ICE the Department of Homeland Security

Subjects

California GPE · 5× ICE ORG · 4× the Department of Homeland Security ORG · 3× Compliant Technologies ORG · 2× Sharp-Collins PERSON · 2× Immigration and Customs Enforcement ORG · 1× Ky. GPE · 1× LaShea Sharp-Collins PERSON · 1× the American Civil Liberties Union ORG · 1× the Associated Press ORG · 1×

Narrative

California lawmakers push bill to ban shock gloves for federal agents - Click here to listen to this article - - California lawmakers are racing to pass AB 2760, a sweeping ban on electric shock gloves for all law enforcement in the state, including federal immigration agents operating in California.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-28
🔮 After an outcry from immigrant and civil rights advocates over plans to equip immigration officers with gloves capable of delivering electric shocks, California lawmakers on Thursday unveiled a bill that would ban the use of shock gloves by any law enforcement agent in the state.
2026-08-28 · Los Angeles Times
California lawmakers push bill to ban shock gloves for federal agents · assertive framing

Claims (20 extracted, 0 hedged)

California lawmakers push bill to ban shock gloves for federal agents - Click here to listen to this article - - California lawmakers are racing to pass AB 2760, a sweeping ban on electric shock gloves for all law enforcement in the state, including federal immigration agents operating in California. asserted
lawmakers → push → California
The push follows reports that the Department of Homeland Security plans to spend up to $20 million to equip ICE agents with the gloves, which emit an electric shock. asserted
which → follow → shock
After an outcry from immigrant and civil rights advocates over plans to equip immigration officers with gloves capable of delivering electric shocks, California lawmakers on Thursday unveiled a bill that would ban the use of shock gloves by any law enforcement agent in the state. asserted
that → equip → state
The gloves deliver can an electrical shock strong enough to drop a strong man to his knees in an instant, and proponents say the gloves provide a fast and non-lethal way to subdue a person. asserted
gloves → deliver → person
Two weeks ago, the Associated Press reported that the Department of Homeland security planned to use $10 million to $20 million to procure the gloves from Compliant Technologies of Lexington, Ky., for Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. asserted
Department → report → agents
The department defended its decision, saying it was “made with careful consideration” and that other law enforcement agencies in the country already use the technology. asserted
agencies → defend → technology
Civil rights organizations including the American Civil Liberties Union accused the department of attempting to intimidate the public by arming agents with another use-of-force option. asserted
organizations → include → option
They noted that ICE already is contending with criticism for multiple deaths in custody and during arrests. asserted
ICE → note → arrests
Assembly Bill 2760, authored by state Assemblymember LaShea Sharp-Collins (D-San Diego), would prohibit local, state and federal agencies from possessing, using or procuring electric taser gloves in the state or with state funds. asserted
Bill → author → funds
The Department of Homeland Security plans to spend up to $20 million on gloves that deliver painful shocks to detainees. asserted
that → plan → detainees
“We cannot spend state money or tax dollars on technology that is not to better our state,” Sharp-Collins said during a news conference with other lawmakers in Sacramento. asserted
Collins → spend → Sacramento
“It cannot be used on our children, it cannot be used on our teachers, our business owners, it cannot be used on anyone.” asserted
it → use → anyone
The CTG-5 G.L.O.V.E — standing for Generated Low Output Voltage Emitter — resembles a thick work glove and can be activated to emit a 380-volt shock upon contact with a body. asserted
G.L.O.V.E → stand → body
Compliant Technologies has maintained that the gloves are weaker than traditional tasers, but critics say they can be life-threatening in the hands of ICE. asserted
they → maintain → ICE
“Many people try to say weapons like this are about de-escalation, but I don’t know how many people have put hands on someone and said that’s de-escalation,” state Assemblymember Alex Lee (D-Alameda) said. asserted
Lee → try → someone
“There’s already a spectrum of non-lethal, less-than-violent weapons out there that exists… asserted
that → ’ → weapons
ICE and law enforcement don’t need another tool.” The gloves have been adopted in detention centers, law enforcement agencies and jails across the country, though apparently none in California. asserted
gloves → need → California
Last week, AP reported that Omaha police agreed to stop using the shock gloves after parents realized they’d been adopted by departments that monitored schools. asserted
that → report → schools
Sharp-Collins said she prepared the legislation in consultation with the state attorney general’s office and legislative council to ensure it would withstand a challenge from the Trump administration if it became law. asserted
it → say → administration
The Senate voted 30-9 on Monday to approve a rule change that would allow for the bill to pass quickly before the end of the legislative session on Aug. 31. asserted
bill → vote → Aug.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support