The Supreme Court’s Security Upgrade Fits the World It Helped Make

Read the original at Mother Jones ↗
Cite

Levy, P. (2026, August 27). The Supreme Court’s Security Upgrade Fits the World It Helped Make. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/08/supreme-court-security-police-us-marshals/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Mother Jones · collected 2026-08-27 · by Pema Levy

Quick Summary

The Supreme Court is creating a robust, in-house security force to replace the US Marshals Service, which has provided protection for the justices and federal courthouses. The court's police department will expand from around 200 officers to more than double its size, with starting salaries ranging from $86,530 to $147,928 and up to $60,000 in bonuses. This move is seen as a necessary step given the increased threat of violence and the justices' distrust of the executive branch, which they have allowed to gain significant power under Chief Justice John Roberts' leadership. The new security force will also include a police command center and round-the-clock protection for the court's nine members.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-27, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

The Supreme Court is creating an in-house security force to protect itself from potential threats. This change comes after years of the court relying on the US Marshals Service, which is part of the Department of Justice, for protection. The new security measure appears necessary, given the current climate of violent protests and increased access to firearms. However, some critics argue that this move also reflects a shift in the world created by the Roberts Court, where the executive branch's trustworthiness is called into question. The Supreme Court will now have its own police force, separate from the federal government's protection. This decision was made after the justices showed skepticism towards the administration's handling of security, despite being known for their deference to the executive branch in legal matters. The court's new security force will be responsible for guarding not only the justices but also lower court judges and federal courthouses.

Written for “US Supreme Court Security Upgrades” on 2026-10-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Supreme Court Security Upgrades
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
82
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
6 of 82 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
95/100
Mother Jones's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-27 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Mother Jones · 306 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Pema Levy
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 On May 8, hundreds of civil rights protesters, carrying signs that said, “No Jim Crow Maps” and “Hands Off Our Vote,” descended on Baton Rouge to oppose a plan by Louisiana’s Republican-controlled legislature to dismantle one or both of the state’s majority-Black congressional districts.
2026-09-23 · assertive framing · Whites Only
🔮 His plan to disrupt mail-in voting, which he perceives would harm Democrats more than Republicans, was the latest.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s Mail Ballot Scheme
🔮 The Supreme Court may be deferential to President Donald Trump and the legal arguments put forward by his Justice Department.
Also by Pema Levy
Whites Only
2026-09-23 · Mother Jones
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Justice Department Republican The Supreme Court US Marshals Service the Department of Justice

Subjects

The Supreme Court ORG · 4× DOJ ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× the Department of Justice ORG · 2× Justice Department ORG · 1× US Marshals Service ORG · 1× the Roberts Court ORG · 1× the Supreme Court of the United States Police Department ORG · 1×

Narrative

While the new security seems necessary, the change is also the product of the world the Roberts Court has built: one where the executive branch cannot be trusted, a violence-prone political movement has returned to power, dangerous people have readier access to firearms, and the justices decide the biggest political questions of the day.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-27
🔮 The Supreme Court may be deferential to President Donald Trump and the legal arguments put forward by his Justice Department.
2026-08-27 · Mother Jones
The Supreme Court’s Security Upgrade Fits the World It Helped Make · assertive framing

Claims (82 extracted, 6 hedged)

The Supreme Court may be deferential to President Donald Trump and the legal arguments put forward by his Justice Department. uncertain
Court → put → Department
But when it comes to their own physical safety, the justices seem to view the administration with appropriate skepticism. asserted
justices → come → skepticism
The court is now ditching the longtime protection of the executive branch’s US Marshals Service, and instead creating a robust, in-house security force to guard themselves at all times. asserted
court → ditch → times
Though famously without its own army, the Supreme Court is building up its own police. asserted
Court → build → police
While the new security seems necessary, the change is also the product of the world the Roberts Court has built: one where the executive branch cannot be trusted, a violence-prone political movement has returned to power, dangerous people have readier access to firearms, and the justices decide the biggest political questions of the day. asserted
justices → seem → day
Historically, the marshals, housed in the Department of Justice, provided security to the justices, lower court judges, and federal courthouses, as well as to selected witnesses and lawyers. asserted
marshals → house → witnesses
In addition, the Supreme Court relied on a small police service, called the Supreme Court of the United States Police Department, to patrol its building. asserted
Court → rely → building
In recent years, its officers have begun to take up work once done by the marshals; this spring, the justices’ residential security details changed hands. asserted
details → begin → hands
Now, the justices are expanding the Supreme Court police into a sweeping force that can replace their longtime protectors. asserted
that → expand → protectors
The justices are seeking to rapidly grow the department, which numbered some 200 officers last year, to more than double its size. asserted
which → seek → size
The justices’ 2027 budgetary ask to Congress includes funds to build their own police command center, assess threats, and provide round-the-clock security to the court’s nine members. asserted
ask → include → members
To compete with other federal agency forces, including the Capitol Police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Supreme Court Police offers starting salaries between $86,530 and $147,928 with up to $60,000 in bonuses with a three-year contract, depending on experience. asserted
Police → compete → experience
It’s essential for our political system that the justices live and work free from fear and violence. asserted
justices → ’ → fear
“The security request is important and necessary,” says Gabe Roth, who runs Fix the Court, a nonpartisan group that advocates for reforms to make the Supreme Court more transparent and accountable to the public. asserted
Court → say → public
“They don’t want to be beholden to the whims of another branch, which is more political.” asserted
which → want → branch
It is not mere happenstance that the justices no longer trust the executive branch to protect them. asserted
justices → trust → them
Under Chief Justice John Roberts, the court has embraced the unitary executive theory, cooked up by Republican lawyers in the 1980s, which gives presidents direct authority over everything carried out inside the executive branch. asserted
which → embrace → branch
The Republican appointed justices explicitly gave the president power over the Department of Justice in their 2024 immunity decision. asserted
justices → appoint → decision
While never technically independent, since Watergate, the DOJ had worked to keep its prosecutorial functions walled off from the White House. asserted
DOJ → work → House
But Roberts’ decision in Trump v. United States clarified that the attorney general is the chief law enforcement officer for the president, redirecting the office’s ultimate loyalty from the rule of law to the occupier of the Oval Office. asserted
general → clarify → Office
The result is that the Justice Department under President Donald Trump is increasingly unmoored from Congressional oversight and acting as the personal legal attack dog of the president. asserted
Department → act → president
By removing any taboo around presidential meddling in the department’s affairs, the justices more directly placed their own security in Trump’s hands. asserted
justices → remove → hands
The head of the Marshals’ Service reports to Attorney General Todd Blanche, who not only serves at the pleasure of the president but has described his department as being in a “war” against judges. asserted
who → report → judges
Trump, who has called Supreme Court justices “disloyal to the Constitution” and said some “sicken” him, is ultimately in charge of their personal security. asserted
some → call → security
It’s not hard to imagine Trump ordering the marshals to lighten security to apply pressure over a particular decision, or to withdraw it as a punishment for a ruling asserted
Trump → imagine → ruling
The concern is “probably 10 or 20 percent of the reason that this transition is happening,” Roth says. asserted
Roth → happen → reason
“They just want to have that control.” asserted
They → want → control
While the marshals struggled to meet demand under a stagnant budget since the Biden administration, the squeeze has tightened under the chaos of Trump’s corrupt and personalist second term. asserted
squeeze → struggle → term
As threats to judges ramp up—in part because of rhetoric from Trump, his deputies, and allies—the judiciary’s security needs have increased. asserted
needs → ramp → Trump
But at the same time, the marshals have been pulled onto Trump pet projects, immigration enforcement, and crime, depleting resources for protecting judges and the courts. asserted
marshals → pull → judges
The marshals were also assigned to provide a security detail to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr, an unusual arrangement that took staff away from the service’s core duties. asserted
that → assign → duties
Meanwhile, some of the justices were unnerved that officers showing up to protect their homes were sometimes only a few weeks out of training, according to Politico. uncertain
officers → unnerve → Politico
In response to questions, the Marshals Service confirmed it provides security to Kennedy; its 2027 budget request includes an additional $34 million for judicial security and $228 million for immigration enforcement and local crime operations. asserted
request → confirm → enforcement
The Trump administration has also overseen more direct political weaponization of the marshals. asserted
administration → oversee → marshals
In March 2025, DOGE and an official from the State Department used the marshals to gain access to an international development agency they were attempting to dismantle, wielding the marshals against another federal agency. asserted
they → use → agency
“There’s some question of whether it falls under the marshals’ duties,” one expert told Mother Jones last year. asserted
expert → ’ → Jones
“You have an extragovernmental agency assigning marshals to do something that’s questionable in the first place.” asserted
that → have → place
Indeed, the marshals assisted DOGE, a rogue operation greenlit by the president alone. asserted
marshals → assist → president
(While the Supreme Court justices never weighed in on this particular Musk-induced skirmish, they generally abetted DOGE’s efforts, granting it access to Americans sensitive Social Security data while denying the public access to information about DOGE.) asserted
they → weigh → DOGE
In what may have been a signal of the marshals’ unreliability, this spring the Justice Department informed the Supreme Court that they would stop providing security at the justices’ homes before the Supreme Court police were expected to take over the job, sending the justices scrambling. uncertain
police → inform → justices
…and 42 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support