JONATHAN TURLEY: Abdul El-Sayed’s wealth-tax fantasy could wreck the Michigan economy

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News · collected 2026-08-26 · by Jonathan Turley analysis
Read the original at Latest & Breaking News on Fox News ↗

Summary

Abdul El-Sayed, a Democratic Senate candidate from Michigan, has reaffirmed his support for a wealth tax in an interview with Fox News' Jesse Watters, proposing that those with over $100 million be taxed to fund public programs. According to El-Sayed, wealthy individuals would not need the excess money they hold, which he suggests could be better left to the public. He cited his own income of $686,069 with his wife in 2025 as an example, noting that they would not be subject to the wealth tax. The article's author argues that a wealth tax would be unconstitutional and disastrous for Michigan's economy.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-26, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
59
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
8%
5 of 59 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
93.4
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-08-26 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Here is a summary of the article in 6-9 sentences:

Written for “Abdul El-Sayed's Wealth Tax Proposal” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.75 Confidence high
Leaning score -0.75 for article 2638 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-08-27

Story

📰 Abdul El-Sayed's Wealth Tax Proposal
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Latest & Breaking News on Fox News
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 5% hedged 1 of 20 📰 publisher trust 93
“Article A mentions an interview with Fox News' Jesse Watters, while Article B discusses a podcast episode from October 2025”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans left further right than this 🔴 11% hedged 2 of 19 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses a senator's decision not to endorse Abdul El-Sayed due to association with Hasan Piker, while Article B discusses El-Sayed's interview about his wealth tax proposal”
Why ‘We Need To Tax Billionaires’ different event · 90%
Zeteo
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 4% hedged 3 of 83
“Article A promotes a new book on taxing billionaires, while Article B criticizes a politician's wealth tax proposal and uses the opportunity to attack him”

Publisher

Latest & Breaking News on Fox News · 134 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.007 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.092 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-08-04
Pennsylvania school bus aide accused of sexually assaulting special needs teen

Who wrote this

Jonathan Turley
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The other thing we know is that he will likely get away with spreading fake polling results.
🔮 In his interview this week with Fox News’ Jesse Watters, the Michigan Democratic Senate candidate not only reaffirmed his call for a wealth tax but suggested that wealthy people really do not have much use for money that would be better left to the public.
Also by Jonathan Turley
JONATHAN TURLEY: Fake pollster's stunt was a reckless game with real races
2026-08-27 · Latest & Breaking News on Fox News
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Democratic Fox News’ Medicare-for-All Michigan Senate

Subjects

El-Sayed PERSON · 9× Michigan GPE · 6× Democratic NORP · 2× Abdul El-Sayed PERSON · 1× Calif. GPE · 1× Fox News’ ORG · 1× Jesse Watters PERSON · 1× Medicare-for-All ORG · 1× Ro Khanna PERSON · 1× Senate ORG · 1×

Narrative

Like Long, who referred to "our wealth" being held by the rich, El-Sayed portrays the property of the wealthy as rightfully belonging to the people, promising that if we "put a tax on wealth it would return a lot of that money back into public use." El-Sayed has perfected the "eat-the-rich" pitch by portraying the wealthy as virtual Scrooge McDucks who accumulate unused wealth as a type of vanity project.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-26
🔮 In his interview this week with Fox News’ Jesse Watters, the Michigan Democratic Senate candidate not only reaffirmed his call for a wealth tax but suggested that wealthy people really do not have much use for money that would be better left to the public.
2026-08-26 · Latest & Breaking News on Fox News
JONATHAN TURLEY: Abdul El-Sayed’s wealth-tax fantasy could wreck the Michigan economy · assertive framing

Claims (59 extracted, 5 hedged)

Dr. Abdul El-Sayed is tackling a new national crisis: the excess of money held by some tragically wealthy citizens. asserted
Sayed → tackle → citizens
In his interview this week with Fox News’ Jesse Watters, the Michigan Democratic Senate candidate not only reaffirmed his call for a wealth tax but suggested that wealthy people really do not have much use for money that would be better left to the public. uncertain
that → reaffirm → public
El-Sayed needs money. asserted
Sayed → need → money
He has called for massive new programs to fund Medicare-for-All, reparations, roads and other programs promised to Michigan voters. asserted
He → call → voters
He is only the latest Democratic leader to support a wealth tax, which would, in my opinion, be unconstitutional at the federal level and disastrous at the state level. asserted
which → support → level
Earlier in the week, El-Sayed expressed full support for a wealth tax, including on non-billionaires. asserted
Sayed → express → billionaires
He declared on a podcast: "I also think we got to start taxing wealth for people who now have over $100 million. asserted
who → declare → million
I mean at that point like what are gonna even do with more money?" asserted
I → mean → money
Figures such as Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., have also called for a wealth tax on millionaires, not just billionaires. asserted
Figures → call → millionaires
As some of us predicted, the use of billionaires was simply a strategic and political framing. asserted
use → predict → billionaires
Once politicians succeed in opening up this untapped wealth to taxation, they will gradually work down the tax rolls as they acquire a windfall in new revenue. asserted
they → succeed → revenue
I discuss the tax in my book, "Rage and the Republic," as an example of the "eat-the-rich" politics used by demagogues from ancient Athens to the French Revolution. asserted
I → discuss → Revolution
Politicians seek to divide a population into "haves" and "have-nots" with the promise that citizens can have it all. asserted
citizens → seek → it
Much of what El-Sayed said is ripped from the pages of figures such as Huey Long and his "Share Our Wealth" campaigns of the 1930s. asserted
Sayed → say → 1930s
In his Fox News interview, El-Sayed reaffirmed his call for a wealth tax, adding: "The question ultimately is, ‘Do you want to drive on good roads, or would you rather have a billionaire make a second billion?’ asserted
billionaire → reaffirm → billion
That’s what Mike Rogers wants. asserted
Rogers → ’ → what
That’s why Donald Trump wants. asserted
Trump → ’ → ?
Apparently, that’s what you want. asserted
you → ’ → what
I think the people in Michigan want something different." asserted
people → think → something
While El-Sayed and his wife reported $686,069 in income in 2025, they would not be subject to the wealth tax. asserted
they → report → tax
It would apply to those with $100 million or more in property and other forms of wealth. asserted
It → apply → wealth
El-Sayed appears to conflate or confuse wealth taxes and income taxes in the interview. asserted
Sayed → appear → interview
He told Watters, "If we tax you at 7%, you’re still going to make what? asserted
you → tell → what
I think that’s OK, they’re going to be OK, Jesse." asserted
they → think → ?
El-Sayed did not explain his assumptions. asserted
Sayed → explain → assumptions
He may have been assuming that a $1 billion fortune generates a 10% annual return: $100 million in gains, less a hypothetical 7% wealth tax of $70 million, leaving $30 million. uncertain
fortune → assume → million
As Michigan struggles to secure new businesses and jobs, El-Sayed is embracing the same policies that would decapitate the top of its tax base. asserted
that → struggle → base
The wealthy have already paid taxes on much of their wealth. asserted
wealthy → pay → wealth
Indeed, they pay income taxes when the money is earned and pay taxes on any profits from that money when it is invested in stock or property. asserted
it → pay → stock
A wealth tax is an additional tax on all that you own, from homes to boats to art. asserted
you → own → art
At a 7% tax on wealth for those worth $100,000,000, the wealthy would pay an additional $7,000,000 every year in Michigan beyond their income taxes. asserted
wealthy → pay → taxes
If a government imposed a 7% annual tax on $100 million in net wealth, the annual liability would be $7 million—though El-Sayed has not released a detailed proposal establishing that rate or threshold. asserted
Sayed → impose → rate
In Michigan, they would also face the state income tax of 4.25% and a 6% corporate tax on their businesses. asserted
they → face → businesses
If the wealth tax is added to an income tax, that would be in addition to the 37% top federal income tax rate. asserted
that → add → rate
Again, the wealth tax would continue to apply each year to what an individual owns in the form of cars, homes and other property, regardless of whether income declines. asserted
income → continue → cars
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., drove this point home when she ran for president in 2020, taunting the wealthy that she was coming for "your Rembrandts, your stock portfolio, your diamonds and your yachts." asserted
she → drive → Rembrandts
While some states are actively considering a wealth tax, many of us view it as unconstitutional under the federal system. asserted
many → consider → system
The federal government secured the right to tax individuals in 1913, but the 16th Amendment only approved income taxes. asserted
Amendment → secure → taxes
This is why many of these same politicians are promising a hostile takeover of the Supreme Court by either eliminating the Court or packing it with an instant liberal majority. asserted
many → promise → majority
Once packed, the Court could greenlight a variety of unconstitutional measures. uncertain
Court → pack → measures
…and 19 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support