JONATHAN TURLEY: Sherrod Brown's pledge turns advice and consent into a punchline

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Turley, J. (2026, October 16). JONATHAN TURLEY: Sherrod Brown's pledge turns advice and consent into a punchline. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/jonathan-turley-browns-pledge-turns-advice-consent-punchline

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-16 · by Jonathan Turley analysis

Quick Summary

Jonathan Turley critiques Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown for vowing to vote against any judicial nominee from President Trump, regardless of their qualifications. This pledge disregards the constitutional duty of "advice and consent" outlined in Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution. Turley argues that by adopting a partisan stance similar to Indiana candidate Jaime West's inflammatory rhetoric, Brown undermines the Senate’s role as a deliberative body and contributes to the politicization of judicial appointments.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-10-16, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In his U.S. Senate campaign, Sherrod Brown of Ohio pledged to vote against any Republican judicial nominees regardless of their qualifications or background, mirroring the anti-Republican sentiment of Indiana candidate Jaime West. This pledge effectively disregards the constitutional duty of "advice and consent" under Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, which requires senators to consider nominees based on merit rather than political affiliation. Brown told MS NOW that he would not confirm judges nominated by President Trump, even if they were as qualified as Louis Brandeis. This stance goes beyond typical partisan voting and signals a rejection of bipartisan considerations in judicial appointments.

Written for “Sherrod Brown Pledge Controversy” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.65, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 84697: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-10-16

Story

📰 Sherrod Brown Pledge Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
29
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
3%
1 of 29 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-16 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 4315 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jonathan Turley
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Brown appears to be eager to jump on the same rage train and pledged that he will vote against any Republican judicial nominee regardless of their qualifications or background.
🔮 May you never feel welcome here again."
🔮 As I have previously discussed, the case involving the liability of energy companies for nuisance actions tied to climate change could have sweeping implications for the country.
🔮 Conversely, he saw government controls and subsidies as forms of control and potentially forms of suppression of the human will.
🔮 Some cases will break along a 6-3 ideological divide, but many more will be decided by unanimity or mixed majorities, as in past years.
🔮 Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner has long been to the law what Philly fans are to football: they are simply willing to do things that others will not do.
🔮 The other thing we know is that he will likely get away with spreading fake polling results.
🔮 In his interview this week with Fox News’ Jesse Watters, the Michigan Democratic Senate candidate not only reaffirmed his call for a wealth tax but suggested that wealthy people really do not have much use for money that would be better left to the public.
Also by Jonathan Turley
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Jonathan Turley →

Topics

Ohio Republican Republicans Senate U.S. Senate

Subjects

Brown PERSON · 10× Trump PERSON · 5× Jaime West PERSON · 3× Republican NORP · 3× Senate ORG · 3× Republicans NORP · 2× Ohio GPE · 1× Sherrod Brown PERSON · 1× U.S. Senate ORG · 1× West PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Indeed, in his final farewell to the Senate in 1805, Aaron Burr remarked that "if the Constitution be destined ever to perish by the sacrilegious hand of the demagogue or the usurper, which God avert, its expiring agonies will be witnessed on this floor."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-16
🔮 Brown appears to be eager to jump on the same rage train and pledged that he will vote against any Republican judicial nominee regardless of their qualifications or background.

Claims (29 extracted, 1 hedged)

In Ohio, Sherrod Brown went full Jaime West this week in his U.S. Senate campaign. asserted
Brown → go → campaign
West is the Indiana candidate who became a viral sensation for pledging to "fire all Republicans" because "I just don't like them." asserted
I → become → them
Brown appears to be eager to jump on the same rage train and pledged that he will vote against any Republican judicial nominee regardless of their qualifications or background. asserted
he → appear → qualifications
Brown is literally pledging that he will toss away the constitutional duty of "advice and consent" under Article II, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution and vote blindly against anyone nominated by President Trump because he does not like him. asserted
he → pledge → him
Brown told MS NOW that "we’re not, obviously, confirming judges that are Trump judges." asserted
that → tell → judges
Unfortunately, it is common for senators of the opposing party to vote against a President's nominees. asserted
senators → oppose → nominees
However, they at least preserve the pretense of "advice and consent." asserted
they → preserve → advice
Brown is trying to win the race to the bottom by saying that Trump could nominate Louis Brandeis, and he would still vote against him because he is a Trump judicial nominee. uncertain
he → try → him
Brown seems to be channeling Jaime West, who admitted that she does "not even talk to them" and hates Republicans. asserted
she → seem → Republicans
It is a curious pledge in a state that voted for Trump three times and is Republican. asserted
that → vote → Trump
What is most concerning is that this pledge is made as leading Democrats are lining up in favor of packing the Court. asserted
Democrats → make → Court
The combination would ravage our court system through packing and attrition. asserted
combination → ravage → packing
Brown would simply not confirm any new judges as a way of reducing Republican judges on the bench. asserted
Brown → confirm → bench
Brown and his colleagues are given absolute discretion in casting their votes on judicial nominees, including doing so on a strictly partisan basis. asserted
Brown → give → basis
They also have the right not to vote on a nominee, as was the case of the nomination of Merrick Garland. asserted
case → have → Garland
While I also criticized the failure to vote on Garland, it was within the authority of the Senate to forego such a vote. asserted
it → criticize → vote
There was a time when the Senate was called the "world’s greatest deliberative body." asserted
Senate → be → ?
The phrase attributed to former President James Buchanan in 1867 is often repeated today like a mantra by senators who have dispensed with serious deliberations in favor of endless demonstrations. asserted
who → attribute → demonstrations
Now, Brown is actually running on a "no deliberation" pledge. asserted
Brown → run → pledge
I am old enough to remember when senators routinely voted for judges from the other party and different ideologies as a matter of political integrity. asserted
senators → remember → integrity
For many decades, senators insisted that they were bound to vote for a nominee if they were qualified even if they disagreed with their liberal or conservative jurisprudential views. asserted
they → insist → views
In his famous 1878 "Kin Beyond the Sea," British Prime Minister William Gladstone referred to the U.S. Senate as "that remarkable body, the most remarkable of all the inventions of modern politics, the Senate of the United States." asserted
Gladstone → refer → States
He is pledging not to consider the merits of nominees in fulfilling his oath to give "advice and consent" on nominations. asserted
He → pledge → nominations
Joining Jaime West, he is announcing that he just does not like them, and so he will not speak with them. asserted
he → join → them
The senators now seem to be offering pure undiluted rage to voters. asserted
senators → seem → voters
In Rage and the Republic, I discuss how the Framers designed our Constitution to prevent a democracy from becoming what Benjamin Rush called a mobocracy. asserted
Rush → discuss → what
It is now becoming the captive of the very blind passions that it was designed to resist. asserted
it → become → that
It was designed to be a bulwark against the mob, an institution that would temper passions, not yield to them. asserted
that → design → them
Indeed, in his final farewell to the Senate in 1805, Aaron Burr remarked that "if the Constitution be destined ever to perish by the sacrilegious hand of the demagogue or the usurper, which God avert, its expiring agonies will be witnessed on this floor." asserted
agonies → remark → floor
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support