Civility vs. Collegiality | Interview: Judges Tom Griffith and David Tatel

Read the original at The Dispatch ↗
Cite

Isgur, S., & French, D. (2026, August 25). Civility vs. Collegiality | Interview: Judges Tom Griffith and David Tatel. The Dispatch. https://thedispatch.com/podcast/advisoryopinions/civility-vs-collegiality-interview-judges-tom-griffith-and-david-tatel/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Dispatch · collected 2026-08-25 · by Sarah Isgur, David French

Quick Summary

Former DC Circuit judges Tom Griffith and David Tatel are interviewed by Sarah Isgur and David French about their relationships, judicial independence, and what it means to be a "former" judge. Tom Griffith served on the DC Circuit for 15 years from 2005 to 2020, while Judge Tatel was on the circuit for 30 years, appointed by Bill Clinton in 1994. The conversation covers topics such as bar complaints and administrative stays, with Isgur mentioning that she used Judge Griffith's standing desk at a law firm where he worked.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-08-25, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

*Former D.C. Circuit judges Tom Griffith and David Tatel were guests on a podcast called Advisory Opinions*. *The podcast was hosted by Sarah Isgur and David French from The Dispatch*, a digital media company that covers politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. *Before interviewing the former judges*, Isgur and French discussed some lighter topics, but they also mentioned that they would be discussing more serious issues later on their show.

Written for “Judges Discuss Judicial Conduct” on 2026-10-16, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Judges Discuss Judicial Conduct
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
61/100
The Dispatch's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-08-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Dispatch · 307 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sarah Isgur
12 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 On today's roundtable, we'll discuss a large number of Americans who say they want substantial change or complete and total upheaval in these midterm elections, and whether the prevailing anti-incumbent and anti-Trump sentiment will lead to a blue wave, a rogue wave, or something else entirely.
2026-10-16 · assertive framing · A Blue Wave or an Anti-Incumbent Wave?
🔮 And have we got maybe the most thrilling, sexiest advisory opinions to date on sealing orders.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · The Secrecy in Courts Dilemma
🔮 Sarah Isgur and David French discuss what’s on the Supreme Court’s docket, debate whether anonymous speech is protected by the First Amendment, and undergo a grim historical review of the death penalty after the Pentagon’s announcement that an execution will be livestreamed.
2026-10-13 · assertive framing · Is Spending Money Protected Speech?
🔮 The Agenda: –An appropriate use of AI by Justice Alito? –“I don’t think Justice Alito has DraftKings on his phone.” –Will Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition ever get overturned?
2026-10-08 · assertive framing · SUNCOR Gets Complicated
🔮 So, the judge is, is calling down the names, and he gets to me, and I go up and I say, "Your Honor, you know, look, I could definitely be fair.
2026-10-01 · assertive framing · Not a MAGA Court
🔮 The second time, maybe we did, but it doesn't matter because now the Eighth Circuit has weighed in.
2026-09-24 · assertive framing · Third Time’s the Charm?
🔮 [applause] [chuckles] We will be doing our traditional term preview, where we try to go through the cases that are scheduled thus far, but in a fun way, and not just a death march through the schedule.
2026-09-17 · assertive framing · Looking Ahead to the Supreme Court Term
🔮 We will start with September 11th and some of the things that Justice Kavanaugh said while reflecting on that day in the White House, and some of the reactions to what Justice Kavanaugh said reflecting on that day in the White House, as well as I will pick a fight with David over the redistricting shenanigans in Missouri.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Barely Averting a Constitutional Crisis
🔮 People may not know this, but the American territories can have their own Olympic teams, including their own soccer team.
🔮 We will talk about bar fare.
Also by Sarah Isgur
A Blue Wave or an Anti-Incumbent Wave?
2026-10-16 · The Dispatch
The Secrecy in Courts Dilemma
2026-10-15 · The Dispatch
Is Spending Money Protected Speech?
2026-10-13 · The Dispatch
SUNCOR Gets Complicated
2026-10-08 · The Dispatch
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Sarah Isgur →
David French
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And have we got maybe the most thrilling, sexiest advisory opinions to date on sealing orders.
2026-10-15 · assertive framing · The Secrecy in Courts Dilemma
🔮 Sarah Isgur and David French discuss what’s on the Supreme Court’s docket, debate whether anonymous speech is protected by the First Amendment, and undergo a grim historical review of the death penalty after the Pentagon’s announcement that an execution will be livestreamed.
2026-10-13 · assertive framing · Is Spending Money Protected Speech?
🔮 The Agenda: –An appropriate use of AI by Justice Alito? –“I don’t think Justice Alito has DraftKings on his phone.” –Will Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition ever get overturned?
2026-10-08 · assertive framing · SUNCOR Gets Complicated
🔮 So, the judge is, is calling down the names, and he gets to me, and I go up and I say, "Your Honor, you know, look, I could definitely be fair.
2026-10-01 · assertive framing · Not a MAGA Court
🔮 The two also discuss the Supreme Court’s ruling on the Missouri redistricting case, and Sarah Isgur makes a provocative argument that may trigger any true crime fans.
2026-09-29 · assertive framing · Is Press Access a Constitutional Right?
🔮 The second time, maybe we did, but it doesn't matter because now the Eighth Circuit has weighed in.
2026-09-24 · assertive framing · Third Time’s the Charm?
🔮 NRF’s comments to USTR on the Board of Trade identified key consumer goods categories where tariff reductions would matter immediately: apparel, footwear, furniture, appliances, travel goods, toys and games, household tools, and consumer technology.
🔮 [applause] [chuckles] We will be doing our traditional term preview, where we try to go through the cases that are scheduled thus far, but in a fun way, and not just a death march through the schedule.
2026-09-17 · assertive framing · Looking Ahead to the Supreme Court Term
🔮 We will start with September 11th and some of the things that Justice Kavanaugh said while reflecting on that day in the White House, and some of the reactions to what Justice Kavanaugh said reflecting on that day in the White House, as well as I will pick a fight with David over the redistricting shenanigans in Missouri.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Barely Averting a Constitutional Crisis
🔮 I will remember, I came out of my office, and I saw a couple of secretaries.
2026-09-11 · assertive framing · Did We Win the War on Terror?
Also by David French
The Secrecy in Courts Dilemma
2026-10-15 · The Dispatch
Is Spending Money Protected Speech?
2026-10-13 · The Dispatch
SUNCOR Gets Complicated
2026-10-08 · The Dispatch
Not a MAGA Court
2026-10-01 · The Dispatch
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by David French →

Topics

D.C. Circuit Dispatch The Dispatch White House the DC Circuit

Subjects

Tom Griffith PERSON · 3× David French PERSON · 2× David Tatel PERSON · 2× Dispatch ORG · 2× Sarah Isgur PERSON · 2× the DC Circuit ORG · 2× D.C. Circuit ORG · 1× DC Circuit ORG · 1× The Dispatch ORG · 1× White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

The Agenda: –Someone file a bar complaint! –Disagreeing respectfully –What’s next for judges after they retire? –Breaking news Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-25
🔮 We will talk about bar fare.
2026-08-25 · The Dispatch
Civility vs. Collegiality | Interview: Judges Tom Griffith and David Tatel · assertive framing

Claims (14 extracted, 0 hedged)

Sarah Isgur and David French invite former D.C. Circuit judges Tom Griffith and David Tatel to discuss relationships, judicial independence, and what it means to be a “former” judge. asserted
it → invite → what
The Agenda: –Someone file a bar complaint! –Disagreeing respectfully –What’s next for judges after they retire? –Breaking news Advisory Opinions is a production of The Dispatch, a digital media company covering politics, policy, and culture from a non-partisan, conservative perspective. asserted
Opinions → file → perspective
To access all of The Dispatch’s offerings—including access to all of our articles, members-only newsletters, and bonus podcast episodes—click here. asserted
access → access → articles
If you’d like to remove all ads from your podcast experience, consider becoming a premium Dispatch member by clicking here. asserted
you → like → member
I was born ready. asserted
I → bear → ?
We will talk about bar fare. asserted
We → talk → fare
We will talk about administrative stays and interim dockets all the way down. asserted
We → talk → stays
But then we will have an amazing conversation with former DC Circuit Judges Tom Griffith and David Tatel. asserted
we → have → Griffith
Now, by way of some background, Tom Griffith served on the DC Circuit for 15 years, from 2005 to 2020. asserted
Griffith → serve → 2020
Judge Tatel was on the DC Circuit for 30 years, appointed by Bill Clinton and retiring just a couple years ago. asserted
Tatel → appoint → Clinton
They've been doing a bit of a road show on judicial independence and judicial collegiality, and I thought, "Well, that sounds very AO." asserted
that → do → independence
And also, I summered at Wiley Rein, where Judge Griffith had been a partner, and that summer I got to use his standing desk, and it was amazing, David. asserted
it → summer → desk
He has incredible taste in wood furniture. asserted
He → have → furniture
So, I mean, that alone- Is that what converted you to standing desks? asserted
what → mean → desks
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support