Chinese policymakers are increasingly concerned about the national security risks posed by artificial intelligence, including potential vulnerabilities in widely used apps like WeChat. This shift comes after revelations of how advanced AI models can be exploited for cyberattacks, prompting Beijing to view immediate threats more seriously than speculative long-term dangers. Meanwhile, US researchers and officials remain preoccupied with hypothetical scenarios involving superintelligence. The article highlights efforts by both China and the United States to develop a shared understanding of these risks despite competitive tensions in the field of AI development.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-20,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
While AI researchers in the United States fret over out-of-control superintelligence wiping out humanity, Chinese policymakers have until now been more focused on immediate risks, from deepfakes to child safety.
asserted
policymakers → fret → safety
But the alarming hacking ability of top artificial intelligence models is leading Beijing to see the dangers in a new light, with the spy agency chief warning this week that the technology could jeopardise national security.
uncertain
technology → lead → security
The potential vulnerability of Chinese mega-app WeChat was also revealed recently when a small team of programmers in California said it had used AI to build a cyberattack “worm” that, if unleashed, could easily compromise millions of WeChat accounts.
“There are more similarities than differences when it comes to AI safety issues” in China and the United States, said Kevin Xu, founder of US-based technology hedge fund Interconnected Capital.
uncertain
Xu → reveal → Capital
But unlike in America, these “don’t get litigated or go viral in public in China”, Xu told AFP.
asserted
Xu → litigate → AFP
Nevertheless, the cybersecurity impact of AI agent bots acting without human oversight “would rank very high among the Chinese government’s biggest concerns”.
asserted
impact → act → concerns
As the topic grabs global headlines, the pressure is on for President Xi Jinping and US counterpart Donald Trump to discuss tackling the AI threats to both countries at in-person talks on Thursday — despite their rivalry in the field.
asserted
Jinping → grab → field
Both powers are “developing a more realistic and shared understanding of these risks, thereby heightening the sense of urgency” to work together, Sun Chenghao of Tsinghua University’s Centre for International Security and Strategy told AFP.
asserted
Chenghao → develop → AFP
Cooperation on shared safety evaluations for AI models or alert systems when crises emerge might be undermined by the fierce competition, however.
uncertain
crises → share → competition
“We’re leading China in AI… and frankly I want to keep it that way,” Trump said when asked about calls from top US labs for a coordinated slowdown of their cutting-edge work.
asserted
Trump → lead → work
Meanwhile, Sun said, “China is concerned that ‘security’ may be used as a tool to restrict its technological development”.
uncertain
security → say → development
A stark warning of the existential threat posed by self-improving future AI systems, posted on X by a researcher resigning from US startup Anthropic, has fuelled debate worldwide over how the technology should be governed.
asserted
technology → pose → debate
China is already actively regulating how it is used, such as by prohibiting the creation of an AI-generated avatar in someone’s likeness without their consent.
asserted
it → regulate → consent
“Chinese AI policy focuses more on real, present-day harms to society and people,” said Brian Tse, CEO at Concordia AI, a Beijing-based consultancy focused on AI safety.
asserted
Tse → focus → safety
“Beijing treats AI as a general-purpose technology — not a ‘god-in-a-box’,” he said.
asserted
he → treat → box
It sees it as “something closer to electricity or the automobile: enormously beneficial for society and industry, but ultimately manageable through regulation”, Tse said.
asserted
Tse → see → regulation
He added that “recent AI capability jumps, high-profile incidents acting as ‘warning shots’, and a worrying pace of AI development through automation” had all pushed the technology up the list of priorities.
asserted
jumps → add → priorities
On the streets of Shanghai, AFP found a mix of concern and pragmatism about AI.
asserted
AFP → find → AI
“In my view, no new technology develops completely smoothly,” said 42-year-old Xie Zongbo.
asserted
Zongbo → develop → view
He said news of the cyberattack “worm” that could hack into WeChat may in fact be “a good thing: identifying the issue, solving it, and patching the loophole ultimately benefits the advancement of cybersecurity”.
uncertain
identifying → say → cybersecurity
“I believe that no business… would ever impose restrictions on themselves,” said a 50-year-old pharmaceutical worker, who gave her name as Jenny.
asserted
who → believe → Jenny
“Take traffic as an example: drivers would never say, ‘I want all red lights’.”
asserted
I → take → lights
Jia Zijian, founder of Singapore-based Inspired AI, said his greatest concern was highly capable AI models learning to crack complex passwords.
asserted
concern → base → passwords
“Suppose these critical passwords or national security key codes were to be effortlessly cracked.
asserted
passwords → suppose → ?
In such a scenario… both China and the US would find themselves vulnerable: if our (China’s) capabilities are strong enough, they would feel exposed.
asserted
they → find → scenario
“And if theirs are strong enough and we lack defences, we would be in a similarly vulnerable position.”
asserted
we → lack → position
The Aporia
