RIP to the Russiagate Liberals

The Intercept · collected 2026-08-24 · by Eoin Higgins
Read the original at The Intercept ↗

Summary

The author, Eoin Higgins, argues that the loss of Alexander Vindman in the Florida Democratic senatorial primary marks the end of the liberal mass delusion known as Russiagate. This conspiracy theory, which suggested that Russian interference was responsible for Trump's election, was used by neocons and some Democrats to explain away their losses and maintain influence within the party. According to Higgins, this group relied on fear-mongering about Russia to leverage power, rather than addressing the actual policies and issues that contributed to Trump's victory. Notably, commentators like Rachel Maddow and outlets like MSNBC profited from pushing the Russiagate narrative, despite its lack of plausibility.
Written by the local model on 2026-08-25, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
68
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
3%
2 of 68 hedged
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject
Publisher trust
97.1
red-flag proxy, not a credibility rating
Outlets on this story
20
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-08-25 · source text last changed 2026-08-25 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

Florida Primary Results

+ NBC News projects that Angie Nixon will win the Democratic nomination for U.S. Senate in Florida.

+ Charlie Crist is projected to win the Democratic nomination for Governor of Florida.

+ Rep. Matt Gaetz's ally, Rep. Byron Donalds, is projected to win the Republican nomination for Governor of Florida.

Takeaways from Tuesday Primaries

+ Embattled and scandal-ridden Republican Rep. Cory Mills lost his reelection bid in Florida Tuesday.

+ NBC News projects that Ryan Elijah, a former TV news anchor and NFL sideline reporter, will win the Republican nomination for Congress in Florida's 7th District.

Socialist Movement Gains Ground

+ A socialist, Angie Nixon, is projected to win the Democratic Senate primary in Florida.

+ Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member and Democratic state Rep. Angie Nixon scored a massive upset in the state's Democratic primary for U.S. Senate.

Other Primary Results

+ Senator Dan Sullivan is projected to win the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate in Alaska.

+ Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is projected to win the Democratic nomination for Congress in Florida's 20th District.

Investigations and Controversies

Written for “Florida Primary Election Results” on 2026-08-31, grounded in this article and the 19 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score +0.85 Confidence high
Leaning score +0.85 for article 2013 (high confidence, 4 verified quotes) · logged 2026-08-28

Story

📰 Florida Primary Election Results
Politics · 20 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 3% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
US news | The Guardian
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 3% hedged 1 of 30 📰 publisher trust 95
“Both articles describe Angie Nixon's win over Alexander Vindman in the Florida US Senate primary, on the same day (Tuesday)”
NBC News Top Stories
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 18% hedged 2 of 11 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A mentions a focus group discussing affordability concerns and US debt, while Article B discusses a political primary election in Florida between Angie Nixon and Alexander Vindman”
Exclusive Offer: 50% Off The Lever! different event · 100%
Zeteo
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 10
“Article A discusses Alexander Vindman's loss in the Florida Democratic senatorial primary, while Article B does not mention any election or specific event.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 5
“Article A discusses Alexander Vindman's loss in the Florida Democratic senatorial primary, while Article B mentions the Michigan Senate race and Mike Rogers.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further left than this 🔴 8% hedged 3 of 39 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses Alexander Vindman's loss in the Florida Democratic senatorial primary, while Article B mentions Gov. Mikie Sherrill (D-NJ) announcing a voter fraud case in New Jersey, which are two separate events”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly right 🔴 17% hedged 3 of 18
“The articles mention different events, one about a senatorial primary and another about a Silicon Valley billionaire's past statements”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this 🔴 13% hedged 2 of 15
“The articles cover different topics with no mention of a shared specific happening”
Primary Meddling’s Bipartisan Turn different event · 100%
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 0% hedged 0 of 2 📰 publisher trust 96
“Article A discusses a senatorial primary election in Florida, while Article B discusses a congressional primary election in Texas”
MAGA’s 2028 Civil War Is Already Here different event · 100%
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left further left than this 🔴 20% hedged 2 of 10
“The articles mention different events and topics: one is about Alexander Vindman's loss in the primary and Russiagate, while the other is about JD Vance's presidential nomination chances and potential sabotage”
Mother Jones
⚖️ leaning not scored 🔴 6% hedged 3 of 47 📰 publisher trust 95
“The events described are unrelated; one article discusses a political primary and the end of Russiagate, while the other article describes the reinstatement of an opinion columnist after she was fired”

Publisher

The Intercept · 19 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
SignalValueWeight
Correction rate 0.000 0.4
Uncertainty density 0.057 0.25
Assertive mismatch rate 0.000 0.35
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Eoin Higgins
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Rather than address what it was about Hillary Clinton’s political platform — and the preceding eight years of President Barack Obama — that opened the door to MAGA, many Democrats and their allies in the media fully bought into the idea that only a nefarious, Kremlin-driven plot could have led to America electing Trump.
2026-08-24 · assertive framing · RIP to the Russiagate Liberals
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Democratic Democratic Socialists of America Democrats Florida MSNBC

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 5× Democrats NORP · 4× Democratic NORP · 2× MSNBC ORG · 2× Vindman PERSON · 2× Alexander Vindman PERSON · 1× Angie Nixon PERSON · 1× Eoin Higgins PERSON · 1× Florida GPE · 1× Nixon PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Chilling Dissent Pentagon Spokesperson Admits There’s a Secret Blacklist of Journalists When pressed about the Iran war, a CENTCOM press official threatened to put an Intercept reporter on a “list of people to disregard.” The Dawn of a New Cold War The growing tension between the United States and China boils down to a battle over resources. The Intercept Briefing What American Doctors Saw in Gaza A new documentary follows three physicians facing the odds: limited medical supplies, Israeli bombing, and upon returning home, media bias and indifference.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-08-25
🔮 Rather than address what it was about Hillary Clinton’s political platform — and the preceding eight years of President Barack Obama — that opened the door to MAGA, many Democrats and their allies in the media fully bought into the idea that only a nefarious, Kremlin-driven plot could have led to America electing Trump.
2026-08-25 · The Intercept
RIP to the Russiagate Liberals · assertive framing

Claims (68 extracted, 2 hedged)

Eoin Higgins is the author of “Owned: How Tech Billionaires on the Right Bought the Loudest Voice on the Left.” asserted
Billionaires → own → Left
Alexander Vindman lost to Angie Nixon in the Florida Democratic senatorial primary on Tuesday, marking a long-overdue end to one of the worst liberal mass delusions of the Trump era: Russiagate. asserted
Vindman → lose → era
Vindman’s loss offers a number of opportunities for schadenfreude, from the comeuppance for his wife’s sneering at Nixon’s clothes to the staggering spending advantage he had over his opponent, a Democratic Socialists of America member — but it’s the bell tolling for neocons cynically taking advantage of conspiracy theory-minded liberals that’s the most gratifying reason for the loss. asserted
that → offer → loss
This cohort faltered at the ballot box in 2026. asserted
cohort → falter → 2026
Vindman follows heroes of the Trump 1.0 #Resistance like George Conway and Dan Goldman, both of whom found that resting on the laurels of opposing Trump six years ago wasn’t enough to push back against more dynamic opponents who offered actual policy plans. asserted
who → follow → plans
Over the past decade, these conservative Democrats and “Never Trump” Republicans relied on liberal fears of Russian election interference and shadowy Moscow kompromat over the president to leverage influence in the party. asserted
Democrats → rely → party
From the beginning, Russiagate was used by a shellshocked liberal establishment to explain away Trump’s victory in a way that didn’t implicate the Democrats. asserted
that → use → Democrats
Rather than address what it was about Hillary Clinton’s political platform — and the preceding eight years of President Barack Obama — that opened the door to MAGA, many Democrats and their allies in the media fully bought into the idea that only a nefarious, Kremlin-driven plot could have led to America electing Trump. uncertain
America → address → Trump
This was an attractive proposal, and it found an enthusiastic, if niche, audience. asserted
it → find → audience
Democratic voters responded well, notably to commentators at MSNBC like Rachel Maddow, who went all in on the conspiracy and pushed it far beyond what was plausible. asserted
what → respond → it
As MSNBC and, to a lesser extent, CNN, found ratings success with the largely fabricated scandal, the infection spread across legacy media. asserted
infection → find → media
The New York Times published Louise Mensch, a serial fabulist whose Twitter feed was a laundry list of delusions, in the opinion section. asserted
feed → publish → section
The Washington Post reported an implausible story that Russians were targeting the Vermont energy grid. asserted
Russians → report → grid
Grifters of all stripes quickly adapted their cons to the new game. asserted
Grifters → adapt → game
In one notorious example, a Twitter user named Eric Garland skyrocketed himself to online notoriety by spinning up a “game theory” Russiagate fantasy where a secret, Avengers-esque team of liberal politicians were using the scandal to beat Vladimir Putin at realpolitik (how, exactly, this was going to happen went unaddressed). asserted
going → name → realpolitik
The thread was praised as “great writing” by notable media figures; today, Garland is a gutter-level antisemite aligned with far-right gadfly Chuck Johnson whose conspiracy theories are utterly incomprehensible. asserted
theories → praise → Johnson
In one of the more amusing, and egregious, examples of the hysteria, pundit Jonathan Chait improbably claimed that Trump may have been an agent of the KGB going back to the early 1980s — a preposterous story that nevertheless netted him primetime appearances on cable news. uncertain
that → claim → news
In Washington, Russiagate mania supplanted actual policy priorities for Democrats both before and after they retook the House in the 2018 midterms. asserted
they → supplant → midterms
As I wrote nearly nine years ago at Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting, establishment media allies like Maddow were so narrowly focused on Russiagate in the early Trump years that they often ignored or papered over instances of corruption and corporate power in lieu of fomenting the conspiracy theory. asserted
they → write → theory
Whether this effort was intentional or not is somewhat irrelevant; the net result was the stifling of the Bernie Sanders wing taking over the party and a reassertion of the neoliberal, corporate-friendly establishment’s control of the levers of power. asserted
wing → take → power
Unsurprisingly, many of the same figures are endorsing that approach again as progressives are winning primaries by focusing on affordability and ambitious policy proposals rather than simply “Trump bad.” asserted
progressives → endorse → Trump
In an essay for The Atlantic on Thursday, Chait argued Vindman’s loss didn’t detract from the correctness of resistance liberalism and its singular focus on Trump — and instructed Democrats not to try to offer voters any actionable policy: “Rather than promise to change everything about American politics, focus relentlessly on Trump’s unfitness.” asserted
loss → argue → unfitness
That’s a message that’s soothing to the elite liberal class Chait writes for, but it’s unlikely to find much purchase among voters, Democratic or otherwise. asserted
it → ’ → voters
The public is burnt out on one-trick-pony versions of escaping the Trump era. asserted
public → burn → era
And Trump’s second administration has exposed the rotten house of cards keeping the U.S. state afloat, making systemic change an imperative. asserted
change → expose → state
For Democrats, that has meant turning to candidates like Nixon, as well as Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed and Maine’s Troy Jackson. asserted
that → mean → Nixon
It leaves the neocons who used Russiagate as a way to pivot and rebrand their way out of a party singularly devoted to Trump and into the welcoming arms of the Democratic establishment in a predicament. asserted
who → leave → predicament
They’re realizing, with rising panic, that they’re not going to be able to dictate the party’s future as Democrats shift away from Israel and express their support for Palestine and a robust welfare state. asserted
Democrats → realize → Palestine
Some of the Russiagaters are already pivoting back to the right, like Michael Cohen, the former Trump lawyer who became the toast of liberal media after deciding to oppose the president in a self-serving effort when facing prison time. asserted
who → pivot → time
On Thursday, Cohen had his former client on the radio Thursday for a friendly chat. asserted
Cohen → have → chat
Others, like The Bulwark’s Bill Kristol, are bullish on liberalism (although, as anyone who remembers the Iraq War knows, they still can’t be trusted an inch). asserted
they → remember → War
Count Vindman, for now, in the latter camp; however, despite his disagreements with Nixon on Palestine and domestic politics, he endorsed her and promised to support her in November. asserted
he → count → November
If this is truly the end of Russiagate’s stranglehold on U.S. politics — and we should all hope that’s the case — then its beneficiaries had a good run. asserted
beneficiaries → hope → run
Grifters and partisans were able to use the conspiracy theory to push their agendas and further their careers. asserted
Grifters → use → careers
Neocons secured a foothold in the liberal establishment which will be difficult, though not impossible, to excise. asserted
which → secure → establishment
And the Democratic leadership was able to put off actually offering voters tangible policy that would improve their lives for a decade by focusing on delusional fantasies — a strategy that’s now coming back to bite them at the ballot box. asserted
that → put → box
But for the rest of us, Russiagate was a black hole of political inertia at a time when the country needed strong moral leadership and new ideas. asserted
country → need → leadership
Let’s bury it for good by moving past the conspiracies toward more progressive policy prospects and to political change that does more than focus on Trump. asserted
that → let → Trump
IT’S EVEN WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT. asserted
WE → ’ → ?
What we’re seeing right now from Donald Trump is a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government. asserted
seeing → see → government
…and 28 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support