Europe’s dilemma over AI was rendered in stark terms this week.
asserted
dilemma → render → terms
The head of the continent’s central bank, Christine Lagarde, said Europeans have two options: shun the technology and lose out on growth; or embrace it and become dependent on tools developed by the US and China.
asserted
Europeans → say → US
The great debate over AI safety that has erupted in recent days threatens to make the choice moot.
asserted
choice → erupt → days
If the worst scenarios come to bear – and experts have differing views on this – then the technology will impact the continent regardless.
asserted
technology → come → continent
Europe has largely been absent from the highest levels of that debate, a result of the continent’s longstanding inability to produce a Silicon Valley-scale titan like Apple, Google or newcomer OpenAI.
asserted
Europe → produce → Apple
While it is a powerhouse in regulation, much to the White House’s chagrin, its lack of an Anthropic or Nvidia-sized frontrunner in the AI race has diminished its voice in the safety debate.
asserted
lack → size → debate
Ursula von der Leyen, a powerful political figure on the continent as president of the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, addressed the issue this week by saying she will “invite the main frontier labs for a discussion on how we can support ongoing industry efforts to pace the frontier”.
asserted
we → address → frontier
Her remarks gained nowhere as much traction as Donald Trump and China’s dismissal of a slowdown.
asserted
remarks → gain → slowdown
Lagarde’s speech on Monday underlined the continent’s relative weakness.
asserted
speech → underline → weakness
She asserted that Europe must develop its own AI technology and build more datacentres in order to nullify the threat of being cut off by the US or China.
asserted
Europe → assert → US
If Europe invests in its own AI tech, said Lagarde, “the threat of being cut off loses its force.”
asserted
threat → invest → force
Self-sufficiency would also give Europe a chance to develop its own answer to the AI safety crisis.
asserted
sufficiency → give → crisis
Margrethe Vestager, who clashed with the US tech industry as the EU’s former competition commissioner, co-authored a report this week – A Transformative AI Strategy for Europe – that echoed Lagarde’s warning.
asserted
that → clash → warning
AI threatens to accelerate a development already affecting Europe, where citizens “are already bearing the economic and social consequences of decisions taken elsewhere”, she says.
asserted
she → threaten → decisions
Solutions to this, according to the report, include building more datacentres – the central nervous systems of AI – and also to ensure the continent is resilient enough to withstand “AI crises” like a powerful model slipping out of control.
uncertain
continent → accord → control
Vestager said that Europe does have a voice in the safety debate through its EU AI Act, the rare piece of AI legislation that sets out requirements for developers of “high-risk” AI systems to report safety incidents and address risks like a cutting-edge model evading control.
asserted
that → say → control
But she adds: “Europe must … build its own AI to strengthen the ecosystem, retain talent, and inspire innovation.”
asserted
Europe → add → innovation
Vestager acknowledges that if there is an existential threat, it requires a global solution; one that does not hand power to the US and China.
asserted
that → acknowledge → US
And that requires a different kind of supranational body.
asserted
that → require → body
“As for existential threats to humanity, we must first assess the actual level of threat – then act with urgency.
asserted
we → assess → urgency
The UN general assembly is an opportunity to address this.
asserted
assembly → address → this
It is vital to move beyond the US-China rivalry narrative.
asserted
It → move → narrative
Frederike Kaltheuner, an adviser to the AI Now Institute, a research body, says that Europe is dependent on US technology in ways that will be hard to undo, from search engines to chips to datacentres.
asserted
that → say → datacentres
But the narrative that Europe is grievously behind in the race depends on a particular view of artificial intelligence aggressively promoted by American tech bosses.
asserted
Europe → depend → bosses
Because of their doomsday warnings, “we are exclusively talking about AI in a very narrow, specific kind of way – namely, the idea that there is such a thing as the AI frontier, which is getting better and better, and that access to the frontier is the most important thing that Europe needs for its security and economy.”
asserted
Europe → talk → security
The reality of the market points at something else, she says: many companies are not adopting so-called “frontier models” – like ChatGPT and Anthropic – because of high costs and fears over what might happen to their data.
uncertain
what → point → data
If this trend continues, Europe may not be so terribly positioned: the EU AI Act has a number of pragmatic measures which address how consumers might encounter AI on a day-to-day basis, legislating over matters such as labelling AI content, and the use of AI in medicine and hiring.
uncertain
consumers → continue → medicine
“Europe has a competitiveness problem, that’s true,” says Itxaso Dominguez de Olazabal, a policy adviser at EDRI, a European digital rights organisation.
asserted
Olazabal → have → EDRI
But US tech boosters are “blaming it on laws and protections, and have promised that deregulation will make European companies more competitive … in a race to the bottom to see if we can catch big tech”.
asserted
we → blame → tech
Nonetheless, the EU AI act is not viewed as model legislation for other countries or a vehicle for a global slowdown.
asserted
act → view → slowdown
Georgina Kon, a partner at law firm Linklaters, says the act is unlikely to be adopted as a global benchmark for several reasons, including criticisms of the heavy compliance burden, which has led to delays in parts of the act becoming active, and a narrow territorial focus on Europe.
asserted
parts → say → Europe
Those criticisms have also meant that lawmakers elsewhere have looked to differentiate their approach to AI legislation from the EU’s.
asserted
lawmakers → mean → EU
“The EU AI Act is not something that everybody else in the world feels constrained by, although many tech companies will of course want to sell to the EU,” she says.
asserted
she → feel → EU
Big tech still has a vast customer base in Europe.
asserted
tech → have → Europe
Kaltheuner worries that the doomsday narratives will push Europe towards dependency, encouraging it to adopt US AI models across the economy out of ill-defined fears over being left behind.
asserted
narratives → worry → fears
“There’s a vision of the future where Europe’s economy, its public sector, its education system runs on models and on infrastructure that is controlled by a very small number of companies that happen to be also in the US.
asserted
that → ’ → US
The Aporia
