A study by Fifty Global reveals that eight major news outlets, including The New York Times and Associated Press, heavily relied on casualty figures from the Gaza Ministry of Health, controlled by Hamas, for reporting on the Israel-Hamas war. Out of 1,378 articles published between March and June 2024, all cited data from Hamas but only three percent included Israeli sources. The study highlights that these outlets did not distinguish between civilian and terrorist deaths as per the Gaza Ministry's figures, potentially shaping public discourse on the conflict.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-17,
using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the
same event (that is the story summary below).
Major media outlets, including The New York Times, The Guardian and Associated Press, relied on casualty figures from the Gaza Ministry of Health, run by terrorist organization Hamas, when reporting on the Israel-Hamas war, according to a new study.
uncertain
outlets → include → study
The findings showed a dependence on aggregate numbers from Hamas, limited citation of data on terrorist deaths and “disproportionate doubt directed at different sources,” writes author Tatiana Glezer, from independent research group Fifty Global.
asserted
Glezer → show → Global
“Together, these patterns support a narrative in which total casualty figures are treated as civilian losses.”
asserted
figures → support → losses
Researchers found that journalists cited numbers from the ministry in 100 per cent of the publications reviewed in the study, whereas only three per cent of all articles reviewed cited Israeli data.
asserted
cent → find → data
The Israel-Hamas war was triggered by an attack by Hamas terrorists, who killed 1,200 people in Israel and took 251 hostages on Oct. 7, 2023.
asserted
who → trigger → Oct.
Although the Israeli military began withdrawing troops from Gaza as part of a peace deal in 2025, there is still violence and unrest in the region.
asserted
military → begin → region
The study focuses on 1,378 articles published from March to June 2024 by eight English-language outlets: CNN, BBC, The New York Times, The Guardian, The Washington Post, Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), Reuters and Associated Press.
asserted
study → focus → outlets
The study found that like the Gaza Ministry of Health, the outlets did not distinguish between terrorist and civilian deaths in their reporting.
asserted
outlets → find → reporting
Articles rarely included data from Israeli sources.
asserted
Articles → include → sources
“Estimates indicating a high proportion of civilian deaths may contribute to reframing a conflict from war to genocide,” according to the study.
uncertain
Estimates → indicate → study
“In this sense, quantitative representations of harm are not neutral; they carry interpretive consequences that shape both public discourse and institutional judgment.”
asserted
that → carry → discourse
The study suggests that a more comprehensive understanding of deaths during the war could be reached by including both primary sources: the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), which provides estimates of terrorist casualties, and the Gaza Ministry of Health, which does not.
uncertain
which → suggest → Health
The IDF said in 2024 that they classify terrorists as individuals who were killed while holding weapons, but did not provide further details, the study said.
asserted
study → say → details
Through its analysis, the study concluded that the Gaza health ministry “became the primary source of statistical information about the war casualties.”
asserted
ministry → conclude → casualties
Neither the ministry nor the IDF offer data specific to civilian casualties.
asserted
ministry → offer → casualties
The study also looked at which outlets mentioned that the ministry’s figures do not distinguish between civilians and terrorists.
asserted
figures → look → civilians
Associated Press and The Washington Post noted the limitation in around 40 per cent of articles, whereas, on the lower end of the spectrum, the BBC and Reuters rarely did (about 1 to 2 per cent of articles).
asserted
BBC → note → articles
“Overall, this essential disclaimer about the composition of the casualties appeared in only about 15 per cent of all analyzed publications,” the study said.
asserted
study → appear → publications
The outlet that most frequently mentioned the ministry’s affiliation with Hamas was the BBC, in about 95 per cent of its articles.
asserted
that → mention → articles
Conversely, the connection was made in about 5 per cent of CNN articles, and in 2 per cent of articles by The New York Times and The Washington Post.
asserted
connection → make → Times
Reporting without providing a fuller picture of where the data comes from can lead to one side being viewed as victims and the other side as “criminal or genocidal,” especially in the online discourse.
“These simplified narratives may, in turn, contribute to the spread of hate speech, conspiracy claims, and the amplification of antisemitic or anti-Muslim sentiment,” the study said.
uncertain
study → report → sentiment
The study calls for “clearer professional standards and greater transparency in reporting conflict-related data.”
asserted
study → call → data
Articles for the study were selected by a search using the keyword “Gaza.”
asserted
Articles → select → keyword
Researchers manually extracted statements about casualties and used a coding system to categorize them.
asserted
Researchers → extract → them
No artificial intelligence was used for those tasks.
asserted
intelligence → use → tasks
The Aporia
