Seven Federal Judges From Minnesota Talk To The N.Y. Times About Trump Administration

Read the original at Reason ↗
Reason · collected 2026-09-17 · by Josh Blackman

Quick Summary

Matt Schwartz from The New York Times interviewed Judge Patrick Schiltz and six other federal judges from Minnesota about their views on the Trump administration's policies. While Schiltz is quoted extensively, only a few others provided on-the-record comments. Judge Nancy E. Brasel emphasized the importance of judicial independence but also noted potential ethical concerns with off-the-record interviews. The article highlights that despite Schiltz's clerking for Justice Scalia and ties to conservative legal groups, his rulings do not necessarily align with expected conservative outcomes.
Written locally by qwen2.5:14b on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

AI analysis runs on qwen2.5:14b, locally

Story summary

In an interview with the New York Times, Judge Patrick Schiltz and six other judges from the District of Minnesota discussed their rulings against the Trump Administration. The judges collaborated extensively, often consulting each other on case templates to rule against government actions. While Judge Nancy E. Brasel acknowledged that Article III judges should speak out about judicial independence, she also admitted this is typically done through judicial opinions rather than interviews with reporters. Some of these discussions might violate ethical guidelines for judges, raising concerns over transparency and the integrity of judicial decisions.

Written for “Federal Judges Discuss Trump Era” on 2026-09-18, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The model judged this article politically coded and scored it -0.35, but every quote it verified points right, so the score is not published.
Written under an earlier scoring contract, which gave a paragraph rather than checkable quotes. Re-analysing this article replaces it.
Leaning score withheld for article 16547: score contradicts its own evidence · logged 2026-09-17

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
89
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
16%
14 of 89 hedged
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Correction & hedging signals
92.8
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

Story

📰 Federal Judges Discuss Trump Era
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

Reason · 213 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)
2026-09-05
Lawyers' Responsibility for Hallucinations in Briefs That They Sign

Who wrote this

Josh Blackman
25 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Some of these interviews very well may violate the canons of judicial ethics.
🔮 I would keep the actual telephone on, so I could receive calls and text messages.
2026-09-17 · assertive framing · Not Using A Smartphone Burdens Others
🔮 The majority couldn't be bothered to say anything more than a sentence.
2026-09-15 · assertive framing · Chief Justice Roberts Goes Postal on Trump's USPS Rule
🔮 Indeed, conflicting rulings from the Missouri Supreme Court and the Eighth Circuit would present the same issue.
2026-09-11 · assertive framing · The Contempt Judgment From Missouri
🔮 There was no evidence this standard was necessary or would actually improve race relations.
🔮 Often, an order from a Justice will be entered before the notation for reply briefs, even though the reply briefs were filed before the order.
2026-09-09 · assertive framing · A Strange Sorting Feature On The Supreme Court's Docket
🔮 In 1989, William Barr, the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, put forward that position in a memorandum opinion for the Attorney General.
🔮 The Log Cabin Republicans will no longer advocate on transgender issues.
2026-08-26 · assertive framing · A Wall Of Separation Between LGB and T
🔮 One would think that a former federal courts professor in the majority would get these cases, but apparently not.
🔮 Thus, any text generated by the AI will be in the same sort of style that the professor has--or perhaps had.
2026-08-24 · assertive framing · AI Freezes The Scholarly Voice
More on this subject from Josh Blackman
Today in Supreme Court History: September 3, 2005
2026-09-03 · Reason · 58% similar
Today in Supreme Court History: September 8, 1953
2026-09-08 · Reason · 54% similar
Today in Supreme Court History: September 10, 1949
2026-09-10 · Reason · 53% similar
Today in Supreme Court History: September 12, 1958
2026-09-12 · Reason · 53% similar
All 25 articles by Josh Blackman →

Topics

Article III DOJ Publius the District of Minnesota the New York Times

Subjects

Schiltz PERSON · 11× Scalia PERSON · 6× FedSoc ORG · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× the New York Times ORG · 2× Matt Schwartz PERSON · 1× Nancy E. Brasel PERSON · 1× Patrick Schiltz PERSON · 1× Publius ORG · 1× the District of Minnesota GPE · 1×

Narrative

Third, the district judges worked together and generated templates to rule against the government: District court judges work alone, but as the number of cases ramped up, the judges recalled seeking one another's counsel, meeting regularly and consulting in running email threads.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 Some of these interviews very well may violate the canons of judicial ethics.

Claims (89 extracted, 14 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent Matt Schwartz at the New York Times interviewed Judge Patrick Schiltz and six of his colleagues from the District of Minnesota. asserted
Schwartz → interview → Minnesota
I have a few reflections. asserted
I → have → reflections
First, while Schiltz is named and quoted at length, it appears that only a few of the other six were quoted on the record. asserted
few → name → record
I think it is problematic when federal judges talk to reporters "off the record." asserted
judges → think → record
Article III judges are afforded lifetime tenure precisely because they should be able to voice their opinions. asserted
they → afford → opinions
One of the judges admitted as much: asserted
One → admit → much
"We are allowed to speak out about judicial independence," said Judge Nancy E. Brasel, whom Mr. Trump appointed in 2018. asserted
Trump → allow → 2018
"And so we should, in order to keep it." asserted
we → keep → it
Of course, judges are supposed to voice their opinions in, well, judicial opinions, not the New York Times. asserted
judges → suppose → opinions
Judges should resist the urge to speak to reporters, especially without putting their names to the quotation. asserted
Judges → resist → quotation
Some of these interviews very well may violate the canons of judicial ethics. uncertain
Some → violate → ethics
By hiding behind anonymity, the public--and litigants in particular--may not be aware of whether a motion to recuse is appropriate. uncertain
motion → hide → anonymity
A spokesperson from DOJ said "suggested that they [should] consider recusing themselves if they 'have made public comments on pending or related matters.'" uncertain
they → say → matters
But how will anyone know what was said? asserted
what → know → ?
Second, the article mentions repeatedly that Judge Schiltz clerked for Justice Scalia. asserted
Schiltz → mention → Scalia
It appears that then-Judge Scalia hired Schiltz as a law clerk, and then brought him to the Supreme Court after his confirmation. asserted
Scalia → appear → confirmation
The unstated subtext is that even a conservative judicial appointee rules against Trump. asserted
appointee → rule → Trump
But the fact that Schiltz clerked for Scalia doesn't tell us much of anything. asserted
Schiltz → clerk → anything
Ed Whelan, a friend and fellow Scalia clerk, interviewed Schiltz back in May 2026. uncertain
Whelan → interview → May
The takeaway, from my perspective, is that Schiltz had no public conservative bona fides at Harvard Law School. asserted
Schiltz → have → School
Judges Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Harry Edwards were ready to hire him, but Scalia did so first. asserted
Scalia → hire → him
Moreover, there are several Scalia clerks (not the counter-clerks), as well as Thomas and Alito clerks, who turned out to be not-so-conservative. asserted
who → be → ?
Schiltz might have become a remarkable judge, but his first job out of law school is a non sequitur. uncertain
job → become → school
We need to stop pretending that an employment decision made when a person is about 25 years old defines who they are for the rest of their life. asserted
they → need → life
And "close" private ties count for little. asserted
ties → count → little
Third, the article stresses that Schiltz has close ties to the conservative legal movement. asserted
Schiltz → stress → movement
He clerked for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in the 1980s and has enjoyed close ties to the conservative legal establishment for decades. asserted
He → clerk → decades
I had never heard of Schiltz before the recent incidents in Minnesota. asserted
I → hear → Minnesota
He has only ever spoken at two FedSoc events, neither of which was on a salient topic. asserted
neither → speak → topic
He doesn't even seem to have been active in the Minneapolis FedSoc chapter. asserted
He → seem → chapter
I'm sure a group of the establishment crowd can vouch that "he's solid," just like they did with John Roberts. asserted
they → vouch → Roberts
To paraphrase Bubba Gump, conservative is as conservative does. asserted
conservative → paraphrase → Gump
In candor, I meant to write this discussion about Schiltz several months ago when he was being feted by the press. asserted
he → mean → press
(Whelan and I corresponded at the time about Schiltz.) asserted
Whelan → correspond → Schiltz
I held back because I thought that the judge was thrust into the limelight, and was not doing anything to draw attention to himself. asserted
judge → hold → himself
He has sought out publicity and a glowing profile. asserted
He → seek → publicity
He is no longer just the recipient of randomly drawn cases. asserted
He → draw → cases
By contrast, Judge Reed O'Connor, who was subject to a hit piece by Schwartz two weeks ago, prudently declined comment. asserted
who → decline → comment
Judges should just say no. asserted
Judges → say → ?
Third, the district judges worked together and generated templates to rule against the government: District court judges work alone, but as the number of cases ramped up, the judges recalled seeking one another's counsel, meeting regularly and consulting in running email threads. asserted
judges → work → threads
…and 49 more, not listed.
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support