Supreme Court Clerks Who Become Law Professors (2012-2026)

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Blackman, J. (2026, October 30). Supreme Court Clerks Who Become Law Professors (2012-2026). Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/29/supreme-court-clerks-who-become-law-professors-2012-2026/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Reason · collected 2026-10-30 · by Josh Blackman

Quick Summary

The article discusses the trend of Supreme Court clerks becoming law professors since 2012, using detailed hiring spreadsheets compiled by Professor Sarah Lawsky to track the number of entry-level hires who completed SCOTUS clerkships. The author also notes specific numbers for each Justice's contributions in feeding academics into this pool between 2012 and 2026, with Justices Ginsburg and Breyer leading at twelve and eight clerks respectively becoming law professors during the observed period.
Written by AI on 2026-11-01, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Since 2012, the number of entry-level law professor hires who previously served as Supreme Court clerks has fluctuated significantly, ranging from a low of 60 to a high of 140. Professor Sarah Lawsky tracks these numbers meticulously and notes an increase in recent years, with nine right-of-center hires out of twenty total since 2020 alone. Notable among these are J. Joel Alicea (Catholic), Sherif Girgis (Notre Dame), Haley Proctor (Notre Dame), Garrett West (Alito), Steven Lindsay (Catholic), Lael Weinberger (George Mason), and Brian Lipshutz. Lawsky's detailed hiring spreadsheets provide comprehensive data on the movement of former Supreme Court clerks into academic positions, highlighting shifts in ideological affiliations within legal academia.

Written for “Supreme Court Clerks Becoming Law Professors” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
This article does not take a side on a contested political question, so it has no leaning score. That is an answer rather than a gap: a match report or a rescue can be warmly or critically written without being left or right, and scoring it anyway is how approval of a subject gets recorded as a political position.
No political leaning scored for article 116447 · logged 2026-11-01

Story

📰 Supreme Court Clerks Becoming Law Professors
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
55
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
3 of 55 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-01 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1046 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Blackman
86 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 I thought it might be worthwhile to dig into the numbers a bit more.
🔮 Today the law firm of Weil Gotshal announced that it would wind down.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Farewell to Weil
🔮 And her unwillingness to participate in any disciplinary proceedings suggests something is amiss.
🔮 Longtime readers will recall that I took mileage runs to Singapore, Hong Kong, and Sydney to make status at the end of the year.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · 1,000,000 Miles on United
🔮 Let's hope that people across the media industry will take Josh Blackman's criticism to heart.
2026-10-27 · assertive framing · The Wall Street Journal Praises The Old Gray Lady
🔮 New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change.
2026-10-26 · assertive framing · Today in Supreme Court History: October 26, 1774
🔮 ] There have been many news reports suggesting that the United States Department of Justice may pursue denaturalization proceedings against Representative Ilhan Omar.
🔮 Nevertheless, the next two decades would vastly enlarge the president's powers as Congress' authority over the executive branch would be greatly diminished.
🔮 Justice Sotomayor, Justice Gorsuch, Justice Barrett, and Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
🔮 The regulations for Freedmen schools in Texas provided that classes would begin at 9 A.M. and "[t]he morning Exercises will commence with either the singing of an appropriate hymn, or prayer, or the reading of the Scriptures."
Also by Josh Blackman
Farewell to Weil
2026-10-28 · Reason
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 86 articles by Josh Blackman →

Topics

Court SCOTUS Supreme Court

Subjects

Ginsburg PERSON · 5× Scalia PERSON · 5× Kagan PERSON · 4× Andrew Crespo PERSON · 2× Breyer PERSON · 2× SCOTUS ORG · 2× Sotomayor PERSON · 2× Supreme Court ORG · 2× Lawsky PERSON · 1× Sarah Lawsky PERSON · 1×

Narrative

The rate has increased substantially from 2020 to the present with nine right-of-center hires out of twenty total hires: J. Joel Alicea (Catholic), Sherif Girgis (Notre Dame), Haley Proctor (Notre Dame), Garrett West (Alito), Steven Lindsay (Catholic), Lael Weinberger (George Mason), Brian Lipshutz (Florida), Micah Quigley (Notre Dame), and Brittney Lane Kubisch (Pepperdine).
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-01
🔮 I thought it might be worthwhile to dig into the numbers a bit more.
2026-11-01 · Reason
Supreme Court Clerks Who Become Law Professors (2012-2026) · assertive framing

Claims (55 extracted, 3 hedged)

Yesterday, I wrote about the lateral hiring market. asserted
I → write → market
Here, I want to focus on the entry-level hiring market. asserted
I → want → market
Since 2012, the number of entry-level hires has dipped to the low 60s and spiked to the mid 140s. asserted
number → dip → 140s
Professor Sarah Lawsky has carefully tracked these numbers over the years through a series of detailed hiring spreadsheets: 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026. asserted
Lawsky → track → spreadsheets
Lawsky tracks how many entry-level hires completed Supreme Court clerkships. asserted
hires → track → clerkships
(This category does not record already hired law professors who are subsequently hired for Supreme Court clerkships.) asserted
who → record → clerkships
I thought it might be worthwhile to dig into the numbers a bit more. uncertain
it → think → numbers
Moreover, to continue my prior post on laterals, I wanted to track how often former SCOTUS clerks moved to other institutions. asserted
clerks → continue → institutions
You can see the details in this spreadsheet, which tracks hires of SCOTUS clerks between 2012 and 2026. asserted
which → see → 2012
Please let me know if I am missing any names or made any errors. asserted
I → let → errors
How many academics has each Justice "fed"? asserted
Justice → feed → academics
Counting is actually a bit tricky, so I had to make some judgment calls. asserted
I → have → calls
If a senior associate Justice hired a clerk, who was then assigned to an active member of the Court, I counted the hiring Justice. asserted
I → hire → Justice
(Still, I found at least one law school bio that listed the active justice before the senior justice, a faux pas in my mind.) asserted
that → find → mind
Likewise, for the clerks hired during the final terms of Justice Scalia or Ginsburg's tenure, and who were then reassigned, I counted them as Scalia and Ginsburg clerks. asserted
I → hire → clerks
What about the clerks who were hired by Scalia or Ginsburg for a future term after their passing? asserted
who → hire → passing
In that case, I chose the active Justice that made the decision to re-hire them. asserted
that → choose → them
I have several observations. asserted
I → have → observations
First, during this time period, I suppose it makes sense that Justices Ginsburg and Breyer, both academics, hired so many law clerks who went onto become academics. asserted
who → suppose → clerks
But I was struck that Justice Kagan only hired three future academics. asserted
Kagan → strike → academics
Perhaps her focus is not on the curious type that wants to write articles? asserted
that → want → articles
Then again, as I've noted before, Professor Kagan didn't publish very much. asserted
Kagan → note → much
To paraphrase John Kerry, "I was for originalism before I was against it." asserted
I → paraphrase → it
Who would have predicted that Justice Sotomayor would have twice as many academic clerks as Justice Kagan? asserted
Sotomayor → predict → Kagan
Likewise, Justice Scalia, a former academic, only had three clerks hired into academia--only one of whom is conservative. asserted
one → have → whom
Then again, I suspect ideological bias blocked many potential Scalia clerks from even considering the academy during this period. asserted
bias → suspect → period
Justice Thomas has jumped ahead in the standings, but as I'll explain below, most of those placements are over the past three years. asserted
most → jump → years
Second, there are relatively few law professors who clerked on the Supreme Court. asserted
who → be → Court
The percentage of entry-level hires with Supreme Court clerkships fluctuates. asserted
percentage → fluctuate → clerkships
Still, the persistent myth that you have to clerk on the Supreme Court to teach constitutional law should be retired. asserted
you → clerk → law
Very few ConLaw professors have actually clerked on the Supreme Court. asserted
professors → clerk → Court
Third, the total number of hired clerks fluctuates each year, though it averages to about 5. asserted
it → hire → 5
I would wager that 100% of the clerks who apply for the entry-level market find a job somewhere. asserted
who → wager → job
The Supreme Court pumps out about 36 clerks each year. asserted
Court → pump → clerks
Let's assume that around 13% of those clerks become law professors. asserted
% → let → clerks
Presumably, about 87% of Supreme Court law clerks do not go into academia, and find employment in the public or private sectors. asserted
% → go → sectors
Despite what one may think, the clerks who work to develop the law are not particularly interested in teaching it. uncertain
who → think → it
Fourth, the ideological imbalance of these clerks is stark, although it has corrected somewhat in recent years. asserted
it → correct → years
Between 2012 and 2015, out of 25 entry-level hires, I count only four professors who were right-of-center: Chris Walker (Ohio State), James Stern (William and Mary), Will Baude (Chicago), and Justice Walker (Louisville). asserted
who → count → center
The rate has increased substantially from 2020 to the present with nine right-of-center hires out of twenty total hires: J. Joel Alicea (Catholic), Sherif Girgis (Notre Dame), Haley Proctor (Notre Dame), Garrett West (Alito), Steven Lindsay (Catholic), Lael Weinberger (George Mason), Brian Lipshutz (Florida), Micah Quigley (Notre Dame), and Brittney Lane Kubisch (Pepperdine). asserted
rate → increase → hires
…and 15 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support