States hold off on discarding 2024 ballots after DOJ notice

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-17 · by Kaelan Deese
Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗

Summary

State election officials are preserving ballots and other records from the 2024 election after receiving litigation-hold notices from the Justice Department. Nevada has instructed counties to retain all materials indefinitely, including those from the 2022 election, while New Hampshire has similarly extended preservation requirements without a set end date. This follows the DOJ's lawsuit against 30 states for access to voter rolls and other records to ensure compliance with federal voting guidelines. The notices were issued on September 4, warning that failure to comply could result in legal penalties.
Written by the local model on 2026-09-17, using this article's own text rather than the other coverage of the same event (that is the story summary below).

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
35
claim-shaped sentences
Uncertain
14%
5 of 35 hedged
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject
Correction & hedging signals
96.2
corrections and hedging in what we collected; not a measure of accuracy
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Narrative spread
1
articles carrying this framing
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

AI analysis (generated at analysis time, not now)

Story summary

State election officials in Nevada and New Hampshire are halting plans to discard ballots and other records from the 2024 election after receiving notices from the Justice Department (DOJ). The DOJ has sued 30 states, including Nevada and New Hampshire, this year seeking access to state voter rolls, unredacted voter registration lists, and other data to ensure compliance with federal voting guidelines. In response, Nevada instructed counties to retain all election materials indefinitely, while New Hampshire told municipalities to preserve 2024 ballots until further notice. Federal law mandates the preservation of covered election records for 22 months; this period ended on September 5, 2024, but the DOJ's litigation hold requires states to continue preserving these records beyond that deadline.

Written for “Election Ballot Controversy” on 2026-09-17, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Score -0.35 Confidence medium
Leaning score -0.35 for article 15476 (medium confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-09-17

Story

📰 Election Ballot Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event. This is the one the site leads with.

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 433 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Kaelan Deese
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Its instructions include suspending destruction policies and protecting electronic records, warning that failure to preserve relevant material could bring civil or criminal sanctions.
🔮 U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, an appointee of former President Joe Biden in Washington, D.C., appeared skeptical that an injunction was warranted, questioning what protection it would provide beyond existing obligations and remedies available in a future criminal case. “What is me issuing an injunction going to do to put you in a different position?” she asked Brennan’s attorneys.
🔮 Vice President JD Vance announced on Monday that 870,000 people will be permanently prevented from applying for federal loans amid allegations that they previously defrauded the government through the COVID-19 pandemic-era Paycheck Protection Program.
🔮 “We will continue standing up for Nevada voters and remain focused on running a safe, secure and transparent election this fall,” he added.
🔮 It uses voter-registration and motor vehicle data to help states identify inaccurate voter rolls, potential duplicate registrations, deceased registrants, and people who may be eligible to vote but are not registered.
Also by Kaelan Deese
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

DOJ Nevada New Hampshire the Justice Department the Washington Examiner

Subjects

DOJ ORG · 9× Nevada GPE · 3× New Hampshire GPE · 3× the Washington Examiner ORG · 3× Arizona GPE · 2× State ORG · 2× Democratic NORP · 1× Minnesota GPE · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× the Justice Department ORG · 1×

Narrative

Both states are among a group of 30 that the DOJ has sued this year seeking access to state voter rolls, unredacted voter registration lists, and other information that the department says it needs to assess whether states maintain accurate rolls and whether any ineligible registrations need to be cross-checked for compliance with federal voting guidelines.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 Its instructions include suspending destruction policies and protecting electronic records, warning that failure to preserve relevant material could bring civil or criminal sanctions.
2026-09-17 · Washington Examiner
States hold off on discarding 2024 ballots after DOJ notice · assertive framing

Claims (35 extracted, 5 hedged)

State election officials are taking steps to preserve ballots and other records from the 2024 election after the Justice Department issued litigation-hold notices, an extension of the Trump administration‘s fight for access to state voter rolls following multiple courtroom defeats. asserted
Department → take → defeats
Nevada has asked counties to retain election materials indefinitely, including any remaining records from 2022, according to a Sept. 4 email obtained by the Washington Examiner on Wednesday. uncertain
Nevada → ask → Wednesday
New Hampshire has likewise instructed municipalities to preserve 2024 ballots until further notice, an official said. asserted
official → instruct → notice
Both states are among a group of 30 that the DOJ has sued this year seeking access to state voter rolls, unredacted voter registration lists, and other information that the department says it needs to assess whether states maintain accurate rolls and whether any ineligible registrations need to be cross-checked for compliance with federal voting guidelines. asserted
registrations → sue → guidelines
Federal law requires preservation of covered election records for 22 months. asserted
law → require → months
That period for the Nov. 5, 2024, election reached its end point on Sept. 5. asserted
period → reach → Sept.
The DOJ argues its litigation hold requires preservation beyond that period. asserted
hold → argue → period
Its instructions include suspending destruction policies and protecting electronic records, warning that failure to preserve relevant material could bring civil or criminal sanctions. uncertain
failure → include → sanctions
States work to preserve ballots Battleground states such as Arizona confirmed to the Washington Examiner it sent information to counties following the DOJ notice, while Minnesota has publicly committed to complying with the preservation request. asserted
Minnesota → work → request
The DOJ sent the notices on Sept. 4, seeking to prevent destruction of records potentially relevant to the future of its voter roll lawsuits that are likely to continue following the November midterm elections. asserted
that → send → elections
Citing “credible threats of litigation,” the secretary of state’s office asked counties to preserve ballots, mail ballot envelopes, proof-of-voting records, and other election materials. asserted
office → cite → voting
“We ask that you retain not only the 2024 general election records, but also any materials that you may still have regarding the 2022 election,” the office wrote. uncertain
office → ask → election
The office anticipated a six-month hold but gave counties no firm date for resuming disposal. asserted
office → anticipate → disposal
“While we anticipate that this request will last no longer than 6 months, we ask that you preserve the documents indefinitely,” the email stated. asserted
email → anticipate → documents
The office said it could not provide details about the litigation and asked counties to acknowledge receipt on short turnaround. uncertain
it → say → turnaround
Meanwhile, Nevada Democratic Secretary of State Cisco Aguilar’s office previously confirmed to the Washington Examiner earlier this month that it had received seven voter-related DOJ subpoenas over the preceding three months, signaling a particular interest by the DOJ in the state. asserted
it → confirm → state
For all of the states implicated in the recent retention requests, the DOJ argues that Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960 authorizes demands for election records to check compliance with the National Voter Registration Act and the Help America Vote Act. asserted
America → implicate → Act
But judges have dismissed voter roll cases involving California, Oregon, Arizona, and New Hampshire, among other states. asserted
judges → dismiss → states
A federal appeals court also upheld the rejection of DOJ’s demand for Michigan’s list. asserted
court → uphold → list
Those courtroom setbacks have established a steep litigation battle ahead over the department’s interpretation of its authority, leaving the final resolve likely for the Supreme Court down the line. asserted
setbacks → establish → line
In New Hampshire, Republican Secretary of State David Scanlan told municipalities on Sept. 10 to preserve 2024 ballots and related records “until further notice,” citing advice from the state attorney general’s office. asserted
Scanlan → tell → office
Despite his compliance, Scanlan disputed the DOJ’s justification for the hold. asserted
Scanlan → dispute → hold
“Nor has USDOJ provided any evidence indicating that any state or local election official may have violated federal law at any point in the past 22 months,” Scanlan wrote. uncertain
Scanlan → provide → months
Asked about the notices, a DOJ official directed the Washington Examiner to a Sept. 10 post by Civil Rights Division chief Harmeet Dhillon. asserted
official → ask → Dhillon
“We sent the letter to ensure these states do not destroy election records related to our ongoing lawsuits,” Dhillon wrote. asserted
Dhillon → send → lawsuits
Dhillon posted the letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger as an example of the notices sent to states. asserted
Dhillon → post → states
The Peach State is particularly notable, given the department was given a court’s sign-off earlier this year to raid the election facility of its most populous municipality, Fulton County, for records related to the 2020 election. asserted
department → give → election
A spokesperson for Raffensperger’s office did not respond to a request for comment. asserted
spokesperson → respond → comment
Some states are still less clear than others on how they are handling the DOJ’s letter from earlier this month. asserted
they → handle → month
For example, Arizona’s secretary of state’s office told the Washington Examiner it sent information to counties, though it was nondescript about specific directives given to local counties. asserted
it → tell → counties
Likewise, Wisconsin’s office acknowledged receipt of the DOJ letter but did not specify its directives to local officials, only noting in a public FAQ page that “Wisconsin follows all record retention and list maintenance laws.” asserted
Wisconsin → acknowledge → laws
Last week, the Associated Press reported the Minnesota secretary of state’s office said the state would comply, while Utah Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson acknowledged the need to preserve records during litigation while criticizing the DOJ’s approach. asserted
Henderson → report → approach
New Hampshire’s Republican secretary of state emphasized that preservation does not mean agreeing to release confidential information. asserted
preservation → emphasize → information
The DOJ’s loss in New Hampshire’s voter roll case is on appeal, he said. asserted
he → say → appeal
“This Office will evaluate any demand to inspect or copy such records on a case-by-case basis when and if USDOJ makes a demand,” he wrote. asserted
he → evaluate → demand
💬 Give feedback
🕘 History 🎫 Support