The Trump administration is preparing to kick nearly 80,000 people, about half of them children, off federal housing assistance over their family’s immigration status, threatening to drive thousands into homelessness.
asserted
half → prepare → homelessness
On Thursday, the Department of Housing and Urban Development published a final rule that would effectively bar families of mixed immigration status from receiving most federal housing assistance, which allow people to receive housing vouchers to reside in privately owned rental homes or in government-owned or -assisted public housing units.
asserted
people → publish → units
As it stands, undocumented immigrants and temporary non-residents in the United States already are barred from personally receiving most forms of federal housing assistance.
asserted
immigrants → stand → assistance
But if some members of the family are eligible, the eligible members can receive prorated assistance to help cover their housing, and the non-eligible family member can live with them.
asserted
member → receive → them
The new rule, which goes into effect in mid-December, would disqualify an entire family if one member is ineligible after a temporary grace period, forcing them to choose between separation and eviction.
Families are “going to be faced with the impossible choice of deciding whether they want to split up so that some people can stay housed, or to stay together and risk homelessness and eviction,” said Marie Claire Tran-Leung, Evictions Initiative Project director at the National Housing Law Project.
asserted
Leung → go → Project
And, Tran-Leung said, children will bear a disproportionate burden.
asserted
children → say → burden
Of the nearly 80,000 people who could be affected, according to estimates from Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, nearly 37,000 of them are children.
uncertain
37,000 → affect → them
Many families have one parent who doesn’t qualify, one parent who’s a citizen or otherwise eligible immigrant — i.e. a permanent resident — and kids who hold U.S. citizenship.
asserted
who → have → citizenship
According to Tran-Leung, the typical mixed-status family in HUD housing is a family of four that fits that profile.
uncertain
that → accord → profile
This rule is “going to tear families apart and take adults away from their children,” said Deborah Thrope, chief program officer at the National Housing Law Project.
asserted
Thrope → go → Project
Beyond potentially leaving tens of thousands of families and children homeless or separated, the change could cost the already beleaguered federal housing agency hundreds of millions of dollars, housing experts told The Intercept.
uncertain
experts → leave → Intercept
This would likely worsen conditions across the board for the roughly 9 million people in federal housing, who would now be subject to onerous documentation requirements.
asserted
who → worsen → requirements
“The impacts are not just limited to mixed-status families,” said Renee Williams, senior advisor for public policy at the National Low Income Housing Coalition.
asserted
Williams → limit → Coalition
Currently, both U.S. citizens and non-citizens are required to submit a declaration under penalty of perjury attesting that their citizenship or immigration status makes them eligible for housing assistance.
asserted
them → require → assistance
Non-citizens under age 62 must submit a document that proves their immigration status.
asserted
that → submit → status
And additional documentation can be requested by local housing agencies or landlords.
asserted
documentation → request → agencies
The rule change would upend the current system.
asserted
change → upend → system
U.S. citizens would have to go through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements program, also known as SAVE, to verify their eligibility status.
asserted
citizens → have → status
“It’s a system that hasn’t been used to verify citizenship before but now is because of the work that DHS and DOGE did together on a very expedited timeline at the beginning of the Trump administration,” said Tran-Leung.
asserted
Leung → ’ → administration
“This causes a lot of concern for us about the very significant risks of residents who are citizens being caught up in verification issues and potentially losing their housing.”
asserted
who → cause → housing
If SAVE cannot verify someone’s eligibility, the new rule requires them to provide documentation proving their status.
asserted
rule → verify → status
The rule would give families an additional 30 days to obtain evidence of immigration status, in addition to the initial 30 day grace period where families can receive pro-rated assistance before having to go through verification.
asserted
families → give → verification
Tran-Leung and other experts worry that the new documentation requirements could make it harder for low-income tenants — particularly older immigrants over the age of 62, who were previously exempted from verification requirements — to access the program.
uncertain
who → worry → program
Older people, low-income people, and people who’ve experienced homelessness are far more likely to lack access to proof of citizenship such as a passport, valid photo ID, or birth certificate, which means an untold number of the millions of people in federal housing programs could lose assistance for lack of documentation.
uncertain
number → experience → documentation
“For folks who may not have easy documentation accessible, who may not have access to a birth certificate, who may not have access to a passport, we’re really worried,” said Williams.
uncertain
Williams → have → passport
The changes would also burden housing agencies financially by requiring their staff to review documents that were previously not required by federal law.
asserted
that → burden → law
But an analysis from HUD itself found that because mixed-status families receive assistance prorated, it would cost the federal government $300 million in additional funds to serve the same number of families as it does now.
asserted
it → find → families
For example, a family of four with one ineligible member would receive 75% of a full household subsidy, while a family of four that was not mixed status would receive 100% of the subsidy, making it more expensive for the agency to house the non-mixed status family, even though it has the same number of people.
asserted
it → receive → people
“At the same time, HUD is requesting fewer funds from Congress to end homelessness,” said Kayla Blackwell, senior housing policy analyst at National Low Income Housing Coalition.
asserted
Blackwell → request → Coalition
President Donald Trump recently proposed cutting $3.8 billion from the agency’s affordable housing, homelessness, and community development programs.
asserted
Trump → propose → programs
HUD Secretary Scott Turner has justified the rule by claiming that mixed-status families are “pushing aside hardworking U.S. citizens,” for housing.
asserted
families → justify → housing
But experts said the changes will make the system worse for everyone.
asserted
system → say → everyone
“This is scapegoating immigrant families, and HUD is doing less,” said Blackwell.
asserted
Blackwell → scapegoate → less
For the families who either are forced out of the program or leave willingly due to fears around their status, the road ahead is difficult.
asserted
road → force → status
The majority of mixed-status families live in California, Texas, and New York, where the cost of living can be incredibly high.
asserted
cost → mix → living
According to the Terner Center for Housing Innovation, the average mixed-status household has an income of $18,000 a year, making the prospect of finding affordable non-subsidized housing grim.
uncertain
prospect → accord → housing
“It’s going to be really difficult, I think, for families to be able to stay in their communities and not be displaced if they lose their access to HUD assistance,” said Blackwell.
asserted
they → go → assistance
Latest Stories
Targeting Iran
Humanitarian Orgs Demand Answers on Yemen War After Hegseth Impeachment Fails
A dozen groups are urging congressional oversight of civilian harm in Trump’s “forgotten war.”
asserted
groups → target → war
Trump Taps Campaign Lawyer and Pardon Adviser for Top U.S. Intel Agency
asserted
Trump → tap → Agency
Trump loyalist Gary Lawkowski has no national security experience to speak of.
asserted
Lawkowski → have → experience
…and 3 more, not listed.
The Aporia
